uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Canon PowerShot SX540 HS



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon PowerShot SX540 HS

Testseek.co.uk have collected 14 expert reviews of the Canon PowerShot SX540 HS and the average rating is 71%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon PowerShot SX540 HS.
 
(71%)
14 Reviews
Users
(86%)
1060 Reviews
71 0 100 14

 

Reviews

page 1 of 2
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2021-09-28, Author: Sophie , review by: rtings.com

  • Excellent overall stabilization performance, Extremely wide focal range, Fast buffer clearing time
  • Mediocre build quality, Poor autofocus performance, Incapable of shooting in RAW

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(62%)
 
  Published: 2016-01-05, Author: William , review by: imaging-resource.com

  • Abstract:  The camera's operability gets minor improvements, though, with an improved Zoom Framing Assist function that utilizes Image Stabilization to automatically help find and frame the subject of your shot -- very handy with these increasingly powerful super-zo...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-01-05, Author: Michael , review by: steves-digicams.com

  • Lots of manual controls, Powerful zoom with wide angle (241200mm), Effective image stabilization, Auto focus is usually quick, Lens can focus at 0cm in macro, High image quality, Fast burst shooting, Full HD video at 60fps, Dial quickens settings changes,
  • No RAW mode, Dial operation could be better, Tracking AF had difficulty in shadows, Low light shots can be a little noisy, No bulb function for long shutter release, No viewfinder, LCD is fixed, does not hinge outward, No external flash shoe
  • Earlier this year, Canon introduced a new super-zoom member to their PowerShot SX lineup. The SX540 HS features a 20.3-megapixel "High Sensitivity" CMOS image sensor mated to the DIGIC 6 image processor, which makes for strong performance in low light con...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-07-23, Author: Carla , review by: gizlogic.com

  • Dise;o y calidad premium, Fácil de usar, Wifi
  • No posee memoria interna

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(75%)
 
  Published: 2017-01-31, Author: Céline , review by: Lesnumeriques.com

  • Menus simples, Ergonomie intuitive, Wi-Fi, NFC, Évolution de l'application, Réactivité globale, Qualité d'image à fond de zoom
  • Pas de viseur intégré, Écran à faible définition ni orientable ni tactile, Mode vidéo non débrayable
  • Le SX540 HS est un bridge grand public d'une simplicité extrême. À vouloir faire trop simple, Canon en oublie l'essentiel et pèche par absence de viseur, ce qui constitue un faux-pas en 2017 et à ce prix. En face, Sony et Panasonic proposent des bridges a...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2021-01-14, review by: Chip.de

  • Abstract:  Was ist die beste 4K Kamera ? CHIP hat alle aktuellen Modelle mit Ultra HD im Test und Vergleich, die in Ultra-HD-Auflösung aufzeichnen. Außerdem verraten wir, warum eine 4K Kamera auch für Fotografen äußerst spannend sein kann und welche Vorteile das im Alltag bringt...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2020-11-19, Author: Margit , review by: Chip.de

  • Tolle Bildqualität, Exzellente Ausstattung, Langer 16-fach Zoom
  • Kein UHS-II-Support, 120-fps-Zeitlupen nur in 720p

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-12-03, review by: computerbild.de

  • Hohe Bildqualität bei Tageslicht, Für eine Bridgekamera klein und leicht, Guter Blitz
  • Kein eingebauter Sucher, Kein Video in 4K, Mäßige Akkuausdauer

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(72%)
 
  Published: 2016-05-02, review by: dkamera.de

  • Durchschnittliche Bildqualität (für eine Bridgekamera), 50x Zoomobjektiv mit sehr großem Brennweitenbereich (24 bis 1.200mm nach KB), Mit 24mm sehr brauchbarer Weitwinkelbereich, Gute Abbildungsleistung des Objektivs bei den meisten Brennweiten, Sehr effe
  • Mit F6,5 lichtschwaches Objektiv am Teleende, Display mit 461.000 Subpixel recht gering aufgelöst, zudem kleine Einblickwinkel, Kein Blitzschuh vorhanden, Keine Aufnahme im RAW-Format möglich
  • Der in der Canon PowerShot SX540 HS (Datenblatt) verbaute, rückwärtig belichtete Bildwandler gehört zur 1/2,3 Zoll Klasse. Seine Auflösung liegt bei 20,2 Millionen Bildpunkten, die Sensorempfindlichkeit kann zwischen ISO 80 und 3.200 eingestellt werden. A...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-07-02, Author: Kristoffer , review by: tek.no

  • God bildekvalitet - skarp optikk og forholdsvis stor bildebrikke, Treffsikker autofokus, Forholdsvis lyssterk optikk med lang rekkevidde, Avansert betjening med svært gode tilpassningsmuligheter, God elektronisk søker, God bildekvalitet - forholdsvis stor
  • Høy pris, Lav skuddtakt i kombinasjon med kontinuerlig autofokus, Betjening og menyer er omfattende og må læres, Bare delvis fleksibel skjerm, Ikke værtett, Ikke berøringsskjerm, Optikken er ikke like skarp som hos Sony RX10 III, Autofokusen er ikke like
  • Men hvis de dyrere superzoomene er uaktuelle, bør du også spørre deg om du virkelig trenger denne store zoomen. Kanskje klarer du deg med den mer lyssterke normalzoomen du får sammen med en mye større bildebrikke, i et såkalt entusiastkompaktkamera.Joda...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 1 of 2 « Previous   1 2   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×