uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Canon EOS 400D Digital Rebel XTi



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon EOS 400D Digital Rebel XTi

Testseek.co.uk have collected 93 expert reviews of the Canon EOS 400D Digital Rebel XTi and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon EOS 400D Digital Rebel XTi.
Award: Most Awarded January 2008
January 2008
 
(84%)
93 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
84 0 100 93

The editors liked

  • Good noise control
  • Very reactive (startup and focus)
  • Good image quality/antidust system
  • Easy handling/interesting style functions
  • Large range of AFS lenses
  • Fast
  • Responsive
  • Diminutive yet solidly built
  • On-board dust reduction
  • Well-saturated images
  • High resolution
  • Great quality images
  • 10 megapixel CMOS sensor
  • ISO100-1600
  • Antidust system
  • 9-point AF system
  • Bundled RAW converter and editor
  • Great features. Bargain price. Excellent lens. Impressive images
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Fast and responsive
  • Intelligently designed with shooting-friendly layout
  • Great image quality Low noise at all ISO settings (apart from the highest ISO setting) Easy to use - AUTO mode
  • Scene modes especially useful for beginners Excellent image quality - difficult to detect any artefacts Sturdy
  • Compact body Good kit lens (...

The editors didn't like

  • Only one adjustment dial
  • Narrow viewfinder (although bright)
  • Capricious white balance indoors
  • No optical stabilization
  • 1855 mm optic a bit tight for a 10 MP sensor
  • Some image noise visible in shadow detail
  • Anti-dust system not 100% effective
  • Anti-shake lenses cost more
  • Viewfinder
  • Battery life
  • Not totally responsive
  • Second status LCD has been eliminated
  • Slow kit lens
  • No spot metering
  • Poor exposure of backlit subjects
  • No automatic image review options eg
  • Auto zoom. No advanced playback review options eg
  • Compare 2 photos side by size zoomed in. Deleting images must be done one at a time. Lack of post processing abilities. Not as many scene modes as other recent di...

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 7 of 10
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2006-01-01, review by: gadgetguy.com.au

  • Rapid and powerful continuous shooting mode. Useful auto depth of field mode.
  • No image stabiliser.
  • Following the successful EOS 350D, this is Canons second entry-level D-SLR. Lets hope we see an even lower-price model soon so we can all enjoy the benefits of Canon quality and Canon build.As with all digital SLRs that shoot biggish files - and memo...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2007-06-23, review by: stuff.co.nz

  • Abstract:  The Canon Eos 400D is a digital SLR camera designed for amateurs and semi-professional photographers with similar image quality to more expensive equipment. It comes with a bright 2.5-inch LCD display to see your photos. This can?t be used as a viewfin...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-11-26, Author: Bruce , review by: pcworld.co.nz

  • Abstract:  Digital SLR cameraThis year digital SLR vendors have been show­casing everything from more resolution, to anti-dust technology and on-camera image stabilisation in their entry-level models. Now it's Canon's turn to refresh its market-leading 350D. And so...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-09-26, review by: asia.cnet.com

  • Compact and lightweight; fast and responsive; intelligently designed with shooting-friendly layout.
  • Second status LCD has been eliminated; slow kit lens; no spot metering; poor exposure of backlit subjects.
  • The Canon EOS 400D remains a very good first dSLR, but ultimately a disappointing followup to the 350D, which cedes its lead to the Nikon D80.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(78%)
 
  Published: 2007-03-06, review by: thestar.com.my

  • Dust reduction system; nine-point autofocus; improved interface.
  • Noise levels a little higher than the 350D; handgrip too small.
  • So is the 400D worth paying extra for? Well certainly not if you compare resolution alone – theres really not a significant enough difference between the 8-megapixel 350D and the 10-megapixels of the 400D to make it worth the money.However, where th...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-01-16, review by: hardwarezone.com.sg

  • Abstract:  10-megapixel cameras seem to be the rage these days and we are not just strictly referring to the professional range. Be it in the realm of digital SLRs or compacts, there are enough signs to tell you that the 10-megapixel camera race is o...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2008-01-01, review by: letsgodigital.org/es/

  • Abstract:  En solo tres años, Canon se las ha arreglado para lanzar la tercera cámara réflex de introducción. Cada cámara parece llegar con pequeñas, aunque importantes mejoras. La significación de los desarrollos actuales resulta claramente aparente cuando colo...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2006-12-08, review by: Lesnumeriques.com

  • Bonne gestion du bruit numérique, Appareil très réactif (mise en route, autofocus), Bonne qualité des images / Système antipoussière, Boîtier simple à prendre en main / Fonction Styles d’image intéressant...
  • Une seule molette de réglage, Viseur étroit, mais lumineux, Balance des blancs capricieuse en intérieur, Pas de stabilisation optique, Optique 1855 mm « limite » pour un capteur à 10 millions de pixels
  • Rapide, simple d’utilisation et délivrant des images de qualité pour le public visé, le 400D séduira à la fois les canonistes et les photographes débutants....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2006-11-01, review by: Cnetfrance.fr

  • Une excellente gestion du bruit ; une vélocité remarquable ; un large écran ; une bonne ergonomie.
  • Un système anti-poussière perfectible ; un processeur d’image d’ancienne génération ; pas de mesure spot ; la molette centrale fait toujours défaut.
  • Une nouvelle mouture sans réelle surprise mais non sans qualités, tant sur le plan technique qu’ergonomique. A moins de 800 €, l’EOS 400D devrait rencontrer un succès au moins équivalent à celui d...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(85%)
 
  Published: 2006-11-01, review by: zdnet.fr

  • Une excellente gestion du bruit ; une vélocité remarquable ; un large écran ; une bonne ergonomie.
  • Un système anti-poussière perfectible ; un processeur d’image d’ancienne génération ; pas de mesure spot ; la molette centrale fait toujours défaut.
  • Une nouvelle mouture sans réelle surprise mais non sans qualités, tant sur le plan technique qu’ergonomique. A moins de 800 €, l’EOS 400D devrait rencontrer un succès au moins équivalent à celui de son prédécesseur. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(85%)
    page 7 of 10 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×