uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Canon EOS 5D Mark 2



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon EOS 5D Mark 2

Testseek.co.uk have collected 148 expert reviews of the Canon EOS 5D Mark 2 and the average rating is 89%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon EOS 5D Mark 2.
Award: Editor’s Choice January 2009
January 2009
 
(89%)
148 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
89 0 100 148

The editors liked

  • Excellent images
  • FullHD video
  • ISO range and performance
  • Live View
  • 21 MP
  • Dual function buttons
  • Full frame sensor. Superb high ISO performance. Shoots 1080p video
  • Too
  • Responsive
  • Crisp results with bundled lens
  • HD quality movies
  • HD video
  • Automatic sensor cleaning on power down
  • Expandable ISO settings (up to 25
  • 600)
  • Pre-set capture modes
  • Automatic lens correction
  • Superb 21MP images. ISO sensitivity of 25
  • 600 means you can shoot even when the sun goes down.
  • The 5D’s new 21million pixel chip reveals more unnecessary detail than the National Enquirer
  • And will probably be just as popular with paparazzi. A handy thumb wheel lets you browse through the 5D’s bewilderingly complex list of options on th...
  • Excellent performance and photo quality
  • Good video-capture capabilities and quality
  • Excellent image quality
  • Good ergonomics and build
  • Menu system
  • Comprehensive feature set and customisability
  • Info panel
  • HD movie capture

The editors didn't like

  • Odd handgrip
  • Lowlight performance not best in class
  • Fiddly white balance controls
  • Lens
  • Need to shoot in RAW to get the most out of it
  • Hella expensive. Menus a tad tricky at first
  • Bulky
  • Expensive
  • Images at ISO25600 appear as if they’ve been faxed in Min specs
  • 21.1Mp full frame CMOS sensor
  • DIGIC 4 processor
  • ISO range expandable to 25600
  • Full HD (1080
  • 30fps) movie recording
  • High-res 3in VGA LCD with Live View
  • 3.9fps JP...
  • No built-in flash
  • No in-camera anti-shake (which means that
  • Ideally
  • A stabilised lens is required)
  • Heart attackinducing price tag. Autofocus in movie mode isn't the best.
  • Huge image sizes mean huge memory cards – and sluggish burst shooting
  • The 5D rattles along at a modest 3.9 frames per second. And while the movie mode delivers stunning images
  • The 5D’s video autofocusing isn’t as rock-solid reliable as...
  • No built-in wireless controller
  • Large spot meter
  • More direct controls would be nice
  • Autofocus system could use an update
  • Joystick and Quick Dial take getting used to
  • Slight underexposure issues
  • Mode dial easy to inadvertently jog
  • Battery and memory card slot covers are flimsy
  • No built-in flash unit

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 13 of 15
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2009-01-27, review by: M3.idg.se

  • Abstract:  Kampen på fullformatsmarknaden har tätnat ordentligt det senaste halvåret. Canon har därför dragit på sig hårdhandskarna och snickrat ihop vad som verkar vara en riktig vinnare. EOS 5D Mark II filmar i full hd-upplösning också. ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2009-07-23, review by: Lydogbilde.no

  • Abstract:  Med Canon EOS 5D mk II, får man den beste bildekvaliteten vi hittil har sett fra noen speilrefleks, og et perfekt redskap for landskap- og studiofotografering...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2008-12-22, review by: Akam.no

  • Nei, hva kan vi si? I høst har vi testet tre fullformatkameraer, alle med fantastisk reslultat. Bakoversveisen har nesten blitt permanent. Men likevel er Canon EOS 5D MkII vinneren. Det er nesten ingenting å trekke for her. Riktignok er ikke kameraet ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2008-12-20, review by: Digit.no

  • Når sant skal sies var jeg bare middels fornøyd med den nå tilårskomne EOS 5D og det var med stor spenning jeg tok fatt på testen av etterfølgeren, EOS 5D Mark II. Selv om det er minimale forskjeller til det ytre, er det likevel et totalt nytt kamera. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-05-28, review by: computerworld.dk

  • Abstract:  Testen er produceret af Digitale Medier Professionel. Et fagmedie rettet mod fotografer, videofotografer og den grafiske branche. Omdrejningspunktet er således still- og videofotografering, herunder også professionelle editerings- og redigeringsværktøj...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-12-04, review by: digitalfoto.dk

  • Abstract:  Efter de første meldinger om den længe imødesete afløser for det tre år gamle EOS 5D var det især de mange nye funktioner, vi var spændt på at opleve. Men allerede i løbet af den første dag med kameraet mellem hænderne var det gode, gamle dyder som aut...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-05-14, Author: Szymon , review by: optyczne.pl

  • rewelacyjna jakość zdjęć JPEG i RAW do czułości ISO 1600–3200, bardzo dobra rozdzielczość matrycy, bardzo dobry pomiar światła, świetny zakres tonalny dla wysokich czułości, skuteczność AF na zadowalającym poziomie, system AF o dużej funkcjonalności,
  • dynamika tonalna dla niższych czułości mogłaby być na wyższym poziomie, brak stabilizacji matrycy, brak wbudowanej lampy błyskowej, brak trybu APSC, wyraźny banding na najwyższych czułościach, problemy z automatycznym balansem bieli w świetle żółtym
  • Budowa, jakość wykonania i funkcjonalnośćPod względem budowy i jakości wykonania trudno mieć jakieś zastrzeżenia do EOS-a 5D Mark III. Obudowa aparatu została wykonana w znacznej części ze stopów magnezu, a jej poszczególne elementy są dobrze do siebie do...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-05-09, Author: Antoni , review by: swiatobrazu.pl

  • Abstract:  Film Dave'a dogłębnie odpowiada na pytania związane z aparatami Canon EOS 5D Mark III i Nikon D800 . W komentarzach pojawiają się praktycznie same pozytywne opinie - i nie ma się co dziwić, bo w teście poruszono praktycznie wszystkie aspekty związane z fi...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-12-29, Author: Kees , review by: fotovideo.nu

  • Abstract:  Weer op de redactie aangekomen blijken we een setje heel mooie nachtopnamen rijker te zijn. De Sony RX-100 heeft echt goed werk geleverd. Heb je geen spiegelreflex bij je, dan kun je dankzij de RX-100 alsnog met kwalitatief zeer hoogwaarde beelden thuisko...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-07-16, Author: Tobias , review by: besteproduct.nl

  • Abstract:  Het was dit voorjaar even schrikken voor professionele fotografen, filmmakers en het uitgenodigde journaille bij het wereldkundig maken van Canon's nieuwste fullframe spiegelreflexcamera. Tegelijk met het bekendmaken van de talloze verbeterpunten op de Ca...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 13 of 15 « Previous   1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×