uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Fujifilm X-Pro1



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Fujifilm X-Pro1

Testseek.co.uk have collected 149 expert reviews of the Fujifilm X-Pro1 and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Fujifilm X-Pro1.
Award: Most Awarded March 2012
March 2012
 
(82%)
149 Reviews
Users
(92%)
88 Reviews
82 0 100 149

The editors liked

  • Full manual photographic control
  • Leica-like construction that feels solid enough to withstand a war
  • Very high resolution LCD and sensor activated EVF/optical viewfinder too
  • Incredibly impressive CMOS sensor
  • Excellent image quality up to 6400 ISO
  • Superb sharpness with good lenses
  • Good build quality
  • Good grip
  • Hybrid viewfinder
  • Nice to use in optical and electronic modes
  • Practical to use in manual exposure mode
  • Stunningly high build quality will tempt those who may have been lusting after an even more expensive Leica rangefinder camera
  • Plus we love the extremely high resolution LCD and EVF/optical viewfinder
  • Film
  • Like images
  • Good contrast
  • Smooth quality defocused areas
  • Great looks
  • Good still images
  • Sharp lenses
  • Decent value body
  • Loads of manual controls
  • Plus we love the extremely high-resolution LCD and EVF/optical viewfinder
  • Rock-solid build quality
  • Full manual controls
  • Stunningly high build quality will tempt those who may have been lusting after an even more expensive Leica rangefinder camer
  • Plus we love the extremely high resolution LCD and EVF/optical viewfinde
  • Outstanding image quality
  • Classleading high ISO performance
  • Oldschool manual controls
  • Supersharp LCD screen

The editors didn't like

  • The high-end price tag
  • Rear LCD not angle adjustable
  • AF slow to snap back into focus if adjusting framing when shooting video
  • Finish could be better in places (buttons made from lowgrade plastic)
  • Controls and handling can sometimes be strange (clickable thumbwheel with practically no uses
  • No lock on exposure correction dial)
  • Autofocus is inconsistent
  • Especially in low light
  • Low battery life
  • No battery guide (to help you get it in the right way round)
  • The priciest Compact System Camera (CSC) out there
  • Auto focus a little sluggish especially during video recording
  • EVF provides more accurate view than optical finder
  • Centre
  • Locked continuous autofocus
  • Manual focus tricky with EVF
  • Small lens selection
  • Lenses are rather pricey
  • Fixed rear LCD (not angle adjustable)
  • Expensive
  • LCD not angle adjustable
  • Slow auto focus on video
  • The priciest Compact System Camera (CSC) out ther
  • Auto focus a little sluggish especially during video recordin
  • Rear LCD not angle adjustabl
  • Doesn't come cheap

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 9 of 15
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-03-21, review by: clubic.com

  • Capteur X-Trans / hautes sensibilités, Objectifs de qualité (18 mm un peu moins), Ergonomie (touche Q) / design / finition, Bagues en 1/3 de diaph / MAP manu. fluide
  • Gabarit en hausse / obturateur bruyant, Autonomie / AF par faible lumière, OVF à 90% (+parallaxe), Vidéo / Prix frustrant...
  • Avec le X-Pro1, Fujifilm réussit son pari: proposer un appareil aussi authentique que le X100 mais plus polyvalent, grâce à une monture d'objectifs interchangeables. Le tout sans rien perdre sur le plan qualitatif, bien au contraire. Le X-Pro1 se manipul...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2012-03-20, review by: erenumerique.fr

  • Qualité d'image jusqu'à 6400 iso, Qualité de fabrication et finition, Prise en main, Viseur (Système Multi hybride EVF), Qualité des optiques, Touches Quick Menu
  • AF en basse en lumière, Touches inutilisées dans le mode de prise de vue, Pas de mode Snap, Cadre de visée de seulement 90%, Menus alambiqués

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2012-03-12, Author: Renaud , review by: focus-numerique.fr

  • Excellente gestion du bruit électronique jusqu'à 12800 ISO. Facillement exploitable à 25600 ISO, Bonne qualité de fabrication du boîtier. Look vintage réussi, Viseur hybride étonnant et performant: les avantages de la visée optique et de la visée électro
  • Autofocus beaucoup trop lent. Mise au point manuelle difficile à mettre en oeuvre avec finesse, molette arrière cliquable sous exploitée, Pas de stabilisation du capteur et premières optiques dépourvues de stabilisation également, Pas de flash intégré. Fl

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2020-01-05, review by: fotohits.de

  • Abstract:  Experten bewerten in Deutsch

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-03-15, Author: tfh , review by: photographie.de

  • Abstract:  X-E1 und Co. Fujifilm hat ein weiteres Objektiv vorgestellt: Das 2,8/14 mm (ca. 800 Euro) soll ebenfalls im November 2012 in den Handel kommenDie X-E1 zeigt das typische Gesicht der großen X-Pro1 und der kompakten X-100 und hat auch das Bedienkonzept der...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-03-15, Author: fs , review by: photographie.de

  • Unterm Strich hinterlässt Fujis mutiger Vorstoß in die Welt der spiegellosen Systemkameras zwiespältige Gefühle. Verglichen mit dem edlen "Vorbild" aus Solms ist die X-Pro1 ein absolutes Schnäppchen und eine ernst zu nehmende Alternative. Misst man die Ka...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-05-30, review by: Chip.de

  • Abstract:  Die beste DSLR bis 500 Euro ist schnell gefunden. Wir zeigen Ihnen, welche günstige Spiegelreflexkamera im Test und Vergleich am besten abschneidet...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-12-27, review by: Chip.de

  • Abstract:  Die DSLM-Kamera bietet sich als ernsthaften Alternative zur DSLR an. Die DSLM, auch spiegellose Systemkamera genannt, kombiniert die überzeugende Bildqualität der DSLR...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-12-27, review by: Chip.de

  • Abstract:  Wer mit einer DSLR fotografiert, wird die kleinen Kompaktkameras nicht vermissen...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-10-30, review by: Chip.de

  • Abstract:  Eine DSLR mit sehr guter Qualität muss nicht teuer sein. Viele DSLR unter 1.000 Euro liefern wunderschöne Fotos und bieten eine überragende Ausstattung...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 9 of 15 « Previous   1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 15   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×