uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mk 2



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mk 2

Testseek.co.uk have collected 124 expert reviews of the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mk 2 and the average rating is 87%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mk 2.
Award: Most Awarded February 2015
February 2015
 
(87%)
124 Reviews
Users
(89%)
785 Reviews
87 0 100 124

The editors liked

  • Excellent JPEG image quality
  • Robust
  • Weather-resistant body
  • Highly effective in-body image stabilisation
  • Quiet
  • Discreet operation
  • Fully articulated screen
  • Image stabilisation is second to none
  • Physical control scheme is a joy for power-users like me
  • One of the most underrated things about the E-M5 is the bundled flash. It's the first I've seen that tilts and rotates just like a large speedlight flash. Tha
  • Decent build quality and great retro style
  • 2x2 switch control
  • All-round improvements from first-generation E-M5
  • That 5-axis stabilisation system
  • High Res Shot for 40/64MP tripod-based shots
  • Small size
  • Precision feel
  • 40M High Res mode
  • Excellent 5
  • Axis stabilization
  • Great 5-axis OIS
  • Excellent handling and controls
  • Much-improved EVF
  • Fast
  • Responsive operation
  • Almost all controls can be customised to suit the user
  • Small
  • Light and weatherproof
  • Large
  • Bright viewfinder
  • Excellent image quality
  • 5-axis image stabilisation allows slow shutter speeds
  • High-quality stills and videos
  • Five-axis image stabilization
  • Superb high ISO handling
  • 40-megapixel photo mode
  • Highly customizable
  • A bright and crisp EVF shows key inormation and previews your shots clearly
  • The articulated touchscreen allows easy autofocus pointing and shooting with one tap
  • Its allmetal body is dust
  • Shock and weather resistant
  • Manual focus is helped by accurate f

The editors didn't like

  • Default control setup is eccentric
  • Complex menus are difficult to master
  • Raw image quality can't quite match larger sensor cameras
  • Image quality hasn't improved in the three years since the original EM-5 was released
  • Despite still being very good
  • It's expensive when compared to cameras with larger sensors from other companies
  • Hard for me to get over the lack of detail when shootin
  • Too easy to knock front dial and press HDR button by accident
  • Limited battery life as ever
  • Low-light image quality limitations
  • No 4K video
  • Complex controls and customization
  • Smaller sensor than some rival CSCs
  • Lesser detail and high ISO performance than some
  • Connectors interfere with articulated screen
  • No 4K video recording
  • High Res Shot only works in certain situations
  • Menu system and controls slightly clunky to use
  • Flash not built in
  • No 4K support
  • Video quality is limited to Full HD rather than 4K
  • Macro mode doesn't get its own setting on the exposure dial
  • The menu isn't the easiest or quickest to navigate
  • Not the best performer in low light at this price point
  • Instead of standard Micro USB cab

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 3 of 13
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2016-09-19, Author: Darren , review by: gizmodo.com

  • Abstract:  All images: Alex Cranz/Gizmodo In late August I spent to weeks traipsing through Europe—on very important work assignments in London, and taking in the local culture of Amsterdam. Being a gadget blogger, I couldn't pass up the opportu...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-05-16, Author: Carey , review by: dpreview.com

  • Abstract:  These days, many (if not most) consumers are likely to shop based on price and capability, rather than according to whether a certain model contains a mirror, or not. We think this is a good thing; with all the increased competition, cameras are improving...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-04-01, review by: examiner.com

  • Abstract:  After 10 years of carrying heavy DSLR gear around (or in more recent months, NOT carrying DSLR gear around due to the bulk and inconvenience), I started considering reducing the size of my kit. I'd been hearing a lot of good coming out of the mirrorless c...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2016-01-12, Author: Greg , review by: pdnonline.com

  • Abstract:  No other camera category has seen as much innovation and novelty as the mirrorless market over the past several years, and the latest crop of models are a testament to that. They're driving forward not only new features but more compact designs targeted a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-11-17, Author: Carey , review by: dpreview.com

  • Abstract:  In late 2015, many (if not most) consumers are likely to shop based on price and capability, rather than according to whether a certain model contains a mirror, or not. We think this is a good thing; with all the increased competition, cameras are improvi...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-07-07, Author: Dan , review by: shutterbug.com

  • The E-M5 Mark II is another evolutionary improvement in Olympus' OM-D line of mirrorless, compact system cameras. While this attractive, retro-style shooter (which looks like a cross between a miniature SLR and a rangefinder) doesn't break much new ground...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-06-24, Author: Mike , review by: imaging-resource.com

  • Excellent handling in a compact, weather-sealed body; Crisp, roomy electronic viewfinder; Image quality that can take the fight to APS-C DSLRs; Unique high-res mode lets it bat far above its weight for static scenes; Extremely fast 10 fps burst shooting,
  • Control dials are easily bumped; Below-average battery life at default settings; Buffer depths for raw shooters are a bit limited; 16-megapixel sensor resolution feels dated; Weak bundled flash strobe

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2015-04-22, Author: Marcus , review by: digitalcameraworld.com

  • Abstract:  In our latest digital camera comparison, we put high-resolution Micro Four Thirds CSC, a high-res full-frame DSLR and a digital medium format camera head to head.An unfair comparison? Maybe. But all three cameras can record photos bigger than 50 megapixel...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-04-14, Author: Philip , review by: popphoto.com

  • Abstract:  Brian KlutchThe Olympus OM-D 
E-M5 
Mark II has a 16.1MP Four Thirds-format CMOS sensor, 5-axis sensor-
based image stabilization, 5-fps bursts and video up to 1920x1080p60 for $1,100, street, body onlyOlympus' OM-D E-M5 got a lot of love when it was anno...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-04-07, Author: Paul , review by: dxomark.com

  • The improvements to the EVF and LCD screen resolution, alongside more customizable controls, have updated the OM-D E-M5 Mark II to respond to the 2015 hybrid market. What's more, with its retro styling, weather-resistant construction, and large range of i...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 3 of 13 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 13   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×