uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Olympus Pen E-P1



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Olympus Pen E-P1

Testseek.co.uk have collected 113 expert reviews of the Olympus Pen E-P1 and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Olympus Pen E-P1.
Award: Most Awarded July 2009
July 2009
 
(79%)
113 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
79 0 100 113

The editors liked

  • EXCELLENT image quality - low noise
  • Excellent colour
  • Detail
  • Exposure
  • Very sharp results from the kit lens Built in sensor shift image stabilisation Built in dust reduction Good 3" screen works well outdoors Worlds most compact "DSLR" - available w...
  • Beautiful retro look
  • Compact
  • Effective scroll
  • Nice build and design
  • Glorious performance
  • Great features
  • Rock solid build
  • Fun effects filters as found on Olympus E-series DSLRs
  • Image quality on a par with SLR cameras
  • Camera set up allows spur-of-the-moment shooting from the hip
  • Its retro look
  • Compact size
  • HD recording capabilities
  • Stunning looks. Interchangeable lens. Metal body
  • Fun effects filters
  • Dimensions mean it can be used like a glorified snapshot model
  • Looks great
  • Wellmade
  • Interchangeable lenses
  • Solid design
  • Gorgeous looks
  • That the Olympus E-P1 is something different becomes apparent as soon as you take it out the box
  • Its sexy retro styling a throw-back to the 70s. The Micro Four Thirds sensor on the inside means that the E-P1 essentially has the same basic features as a f...
  • Striking design
  • Excellent build quality
  • Impressive photo quality
  • Support for interchangeable lenses
  • Image quality
  • Handling
  • Super control panel
  • Comprehensive
  • Creative feature set
  • Good dust reduction system
  • Retro styling
  • Build
  • Lenses

The editors didn't like

  • No flash - dedicated flash is expensive (£159 in the UK
  • $99 in the US) Lens noise on videos when AF or Manual Focus is used. Menu system(s) can get confusing without reference to the manual The lowest you can set Auto ISO to is ISO200 - does this ne...
  • Screen resolution
  • No viewfinder / optional viewfinder imprecise
  • Illogical menus
  • Ineffective stabilization
  • Insufficient battery life
  • Awkward controls
  • More lenses needed
  • Lens build is a bit plasticky and cheap
  • Pricey for anyone looking to invest in a whole new system as the same outlay would buy a starter DSLR and a couple of lenses
  • No built in optical viewfinder or flash – but both available if paying more
  • Pricy
  • Even if it is worth it
  • Autofocus takes a while to work
  • Some muddled menu options
  • No viewfinder. Expensive. Slow
  • No optical viewfinder or flash provided
  • Plus the same outlay would buy an entry level DSLR and a couple of lenses – albeit one without HD video
  • Expensive
  • Image quality not up there with real DSLRs
  • No flash or optical viewfinder
  • There's no built-in flash and what about an optical viewfinder
  • Eh Olympus? You have to rely on the LED display
  • Which isn't bad by any stretch
  • But it can be tricky in bright conditions. The only other gripe is the price. £700 for an "inbetw...
  • Sluggish autofocus
  • Short battery life
  • Low-resolution LCD
  • Lacks on-camera flash and viewfinder
  • No (built-in) viewfinder
  • No built-in flash
  • Price

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 12
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2009-12-07, review by: macworld.com

  • Very good image quality; nice design and small size; compatible with Micro Four Thirds lenses.
  • Slow auto focus; no built-in flash; ISO ratings are a little fast.
  • As a second camera for an SLR shooter, or as an advanced camera for the photographer who wants more than a point-and-shoot, but really needs the smallest camera possible, the E-P1 is a very good choice. Auto-focus is a little slow for some application...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2009-11-17, review by: photozone.de

  • Finally Olympus released their first micro-four-thirds digital camera styled in the retro design of the classic Olympus PEN - a highly successful rangefinder camera back in the 60s. Obviously they feel that the time is about right for such dwarfish, ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(64%)
 
  Published: 2009-11-16, review by: Geek.com

  • Abstract:  The Olympus PEN E-P1 Micro Four-Thirds camera is a beautiful piece of hardware and something photo geeks can’t help but want. After all, it has lots of history behind it, it’s one of the best looking digital cameras on on the market, and it packs much ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-11-09, review by: wired.com

  • Solidly built, nostalgically styled 12.3megapixel cam that rewards a considered approach to picturetaking. Tidy images up to ISO 1600. Manual controls. Mated with the lowprofile 17mm f2.8 lens ($300), this is a street shooter's dream. Excellent image...
  • Lores LCD a real disappointment. Complicated menus. External flash only ($200). Subpar lowlight, ultrahighISO shots.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2009-11-01, review by: cameralabs.com

  • Compact body with DSLR-sized sensor, Built-in stabilisation works with any lens, HD movie mode and HDMI port, Broad customisation and Level Gauge.
  • Leisurely autofocus system, No built-in flash or viewfinder, Average resolution screen, Collapsing kit zoom mechanism can annoy.
  • When Olympus and Panasonic developed Micro Four Thirds, it was cameras like the E-P1 and GF1 which really had enthusiasts excited: the dream of squeezing a DSLR sensor and interchangeable lenses into as small a form factor as possible. And in this res...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(83%)
 
  Published: 2009-10-04, review by: tomsguide.com

  • Abstract:  The E-P1 probably the embodies the nicest concept we have seen recently. Unfortunately there are also plenty of technical drawbacks...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2009-10-01, review by: digital-photography-school.com

  • Abstract:  We knew it was coming but it still surprised many when Olympus threw away the last vestiges of a single lens reflex camera in a digital snapper that otherwise could have been called a DSLR.Into the new PEN went the 4/3rds inch Micro Four Thirds Live M...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-09-30, review by: popphoto.com

  • With only three cameras available so far in the Micro Four Thirds format, it’s hard to compare the Olympus E-P1 with direct competitors—there really aren’t any. But next to Panasonic’s GH1, despite a virtual tie in our lab tests, w...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-09-28, review by: imaging-resource.com

  • Small, inspiring design, Mirrorless design allows smaller optics, smaller body, Very compact lens designs, Good heft, but reasonably light at only one pound, Good LCD performance in bright sunlight, Control wheels work well, Leveling feature, Histogram...
  • Short battery life, No built-in flash, Low-res LCD screen, D-ring straps require metal-to-metal coupling rather than quieter metal-to-cloth, introducing rattle into audio tracks of movies, Leveling screen doesnt offer basic aperture and shutter speed ...
  • Not only did it introduce a new and much needed form factor to the digital camera market, the Olympus E-P1 is a great camera in its own right. (In fact, its detail rendering at moderate to high ISOs really marks a new level of performance for Four Thir...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-09-28, review by: akihabaranews.com

  • Abstract:  We were all impressed by the Panasonic GH1 and its amazing Video Mode and acceptable photo quality… Well at least way better than many other point and shoot or bridge available, but still a tiny little bit under a Nikon D90 (both the GH1 and D90 are so...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 4 of 12 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 12   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×