uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

Testseek.co.uk have collected 116 expert reviews of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3.
Award: Good Buy July 2011
July 2011
 
(79%)
116 Reviews
Users
(85%)
37 Reviews
79 0 100 116

The editors liked

  • Super-fast AF performance
  • Touch AF and Touch Shutter control
  • Intuitive touch-screen controls
  • Very small body
  • Lots of control
  • Easy to use
  • Built-in flash
  • Solid feel construction
  • Smaller compact-like form factor yet retaining the DSLR-like ability to swap lenses
  • User friendly blend of virtual and “real” buttons
  • Metal build
  • Ease of use
  • Responsive touch screen and AF
  • Creative Control modes
  • Good picture quality
  • Compact size
  • Interchangeable lenses
  • 1080i video recording
  • Well designed and easy to use
  • Good quality photos up to 1600 ISO
  • 1080i HD video
  • Optional touchscreen is fun to use
  • Excellent image quality
  • Solid metal build
  • Creative Control modes including the punchy Expressive

The editors didn't like

  • Hot-shoe connection has been removed
  • Pop-up flash a bit delicate
  • It's not cheap
  • No viewfinder No accessory port Unbalanced with longer lenses
  • Flimsy rubber cover to HDMI and AV port
  • No in-body image stabilisation
  • Mono sound
  • Smaller form factor gives rise to occasional image blur resulting from camera shake in lower light more than predecessors
  • Omits hotshoe and means of attaching a suppleme
  • Pricey compared to premium fixed lens camera
  • LCD not angle adjustable
  • Hotshoe and accessory port omitted to achieve size
  • No accessory shoe
  • Mono-only sound recording
  • No mode dial
  • Expensive
  • Electronic noise gets out of hand beyond 1600 ISO
  • Weirdly
  • The main menu doesn't work with the touchscreen
  • No hot shoe for an external flash
  • Mic only just about acceptable (it's mono and has a lot of crackle)
  • Photos aren't automatically rotated unless you use a stabilised lens
  • No electronic viewfinder capability.
  • Pricey compared to a fixed-lens compact like Panasonic’s LX5 (£458.99)
  • No hotshoe and accessory port

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 12
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-06-01, review by: evogadget.com

  • The new Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3W is a pretty decent camera, with good specifications and features. At the end of this test we consider that this camera a good choice if you want to buy a Micro Four Thirds model....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-01-11, review by: computeractive.co.uk

  • Abstract:  a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-07, Author: Gavin , review by: macworld.co.uk

  • Solid metal build; easy to use; responsive touch screen and AF; Creative Control modes including the punchy Expressive
  • Pricey compared to a fixed-lens compact like Panasonic’s LX5 (£458.99); mono sound; no hotshoe and accessory port
  • Otherwise, a full-size JPEG is saved in two to three seconds; shoot a maximum-quality Raw file alongside and wait a further second before the screen snaps back to live view. We particularly enjoyed the Expressive shooting mode, which boosts JPEG colour sa...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-11-18, Author: Ben , review by: alphr.com

  • Extremely rewarding to use, but noise levels in low light aren't up to today's standards...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(83%)
 
  Published: 2011-09-20, Author: Jeremy , review by: reviewed.com

  • Our disappointment with the camera stems from the fact that it showed little to no improvement over its predecessor, the GF2, in terms of video recording features and capability. The camera has no aperture or shutter speed control options in video mode, i...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-08-31, Author: TJ , review by: reviewed.com

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-08-31, Author: TJ , review by: reviewed.com

  • Comparing the GF3 to its predecessors is like looking at one of those "history of man" posters in reverse. The old GF1 featured enthusiast-level manual control, physical dials, and customizable options, and the GF2 and now the GF3 feature intelligent auto...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-08-30, review by: itreviews.com

  • Excellent image quality; interchangeable lenses,
  • No electronic viewfinder capability.
  • If you're ready to make that leap from compact digital cameras to the bigger league, then the compact and lightweight Lumix DMC-GF3 with its extremely impressive images and interchangeable lenses might do the trick, despite a few key omissions. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-08-24, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Well designed and easy to use, Good quality photos up to 1600 ISO, 1080i HD video, Optional touchscreen is fun to use
  • Electronic noise gets out of hand beyond 1600 ISO, Weirdly, the main menu doesn't work with the touchscreen, No hot shoe for an external flash, Mic only just about acceptable (it's mono and has a lot of crackle), Photos aren't automatically rotated unless you use a stabilised lens
  • The Panasonic GF3 is aimed at ordinary consumers and so does without some features beloved of more advanced users, like a hot shoe for attaching an external flash, or direct access to manual modes. It remains an attractive little camera capable of taki...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-08-02, review by: CNET.co.uk

  • Good picture quality; compact size; interchangeable lenses; 1080i video recording
  • No accessory shoe; mono-only sound recording; no mode dial; expensive
  • The lens-swapping Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 Micro Four Thirds camera is well built and takes a great picture, but you'll pay a premium for its small size....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 1 of 12 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 12   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×