uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 4

Testseek.co.uk have collected 169 expert reviews of the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 4 and the average rating is 87%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 4.
Award: Good Buy July 2015
July 2015
 
(87%)
169 Reviews
Users
(88%)
771 Reviews
87 0 100 169

The editors liked

  • The pocketable compact to beat
  • Excellent image quality
  • Built-in electronic viewfinder
  • Fast aperture lens
  • Customisable control ring
  • Small and stylish
  • Even with a three-year-old design
  • Great image quality
  • Autofocus is improved
  • Great overall 4K image quality
  • New sensor tech enables neat tricks like super slow motion
  • 1/32000 shutter speed
  • And 16 fps burst mode
  • Great video features to supplement its 4K capabilities distinguish the Sony Cyber-shot RX100 IV from the rest of the advanced-compact pack. It also retains the nice design perks
  • Like a popup electronic viewfinder
  • Of the earlier RX100 models
  • Compact design
  • 2.35milliondot OLED viewfinder
  • Excellent picture quality
  • 180° swivel screen
  • Programmable lens ring
  • WiFi and NFC
  • Comprehensive range of video modes
  • Including 4K
  • HFR modes with slowmotion video to 1000 fps
  • Impressive resolution for a camera so small
  • Advanced video capabilities including 4K and slow motion recording
  • 16fps continuous shooting
  • Electronic shutter (allowing shutter speeds of up to 1/32000sec to be used)
  • Built-in Wi-Fi & NFC connectivity
  • USB
  • High
  • Resolution viewfinder
  • Tilting screen
  • Large sensor
  • 4K video
  • High-resolution viewfinder
  • 4K videos
  • Brilliantly fun HFR mode
  • Pocket-sized
  • Very high-quality stills and movies
  • 25x telephoto Zeiss lens
  • Eye AF function is outstanding
  • Features designed for amateur filmmaking
  • 1-inch stacked sensor
  • 1-inch
  • 20.1MP “stacked” CMOS sensor
  • Outstanding photos and videos
  • 4K and super-slow-motion modes
  • Improved EVF
  • Pocketable size
  • Excellent shooting speed
  • Versatile video
  • Great image quality at lower ISOs
  • Impressive slowmotion video capture
  • Remarkably compact design
  • Refreshingly easy to use
  • Despite the wealth of features
  • 4K resolution video and still image capture
  • Good lowlight performance
  • Useful articulated LCD screen

The editors didn't like

  • Hugely expensive
  • Autofocus performance could be yet faster
  • Still no touchscreen
  • Limited bump over third-gen predecessor
  • Controls are cramped
  • And they've been that way since 2012
  • The viewfinder is hampered by awkward mechanics and tiny size
  • Image quality on super slow motion footage is extremely bad
  • There's no way to attach an external microphone
  • Whoa is it expens
  • Like its predecessor
  • The autofocus system could be more consistent and the battery life has gotten even worse
  • Lens quality isn't consistent over the frame
  • Menus are too dense and complex
  • Tends to get hot
  • Battery life could be better
  • Slow startup
  • Not enough connection ports for a camera with these video capabilities
  • SDXC card required to film XAVCS
  • Reduced battery life (280 shots)
  • No touchscreen functionality
  • No rubberised handgrip
  • Small buttons
  • High price
  • No touchscreen
  • Limited raw functionality
  • Prohibitive price
  • Limited zoom range
  • Tends to overexpose in auto mode
  • Sony's menus are still hard to navigate
  • Even pricier than before
  • Limited focal range
  • Mediocre battery life
  • Intimidating price
  • No touchscreen control
  • The electronic viewfinder is too small and unreliable

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 17
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2015-08-26, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Although the increase in sensor performance is evolutionary rather than revolutionary, it's still significant. The new stacked design (and accompanying processor) has allowed some remarkable increases in frame rates both with 4K capture and Full HD, notab...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-08-24, Author: Amy , review by: photographyblog.com

  • Sony has made some good improvements to what is already an excellently performing camera, but there are still a few small problems with the RX100 IV which make it just slightly less than perfect. Even if you can put the extremely high price aside (especi...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2015-08-04, Author: Philip , review by: popphoto.com

  • Abstract:  After the cheap end of the compact camera market was gobbled up by smartphones, camera makers had to upgrade their fancier compacts to keep ahead of the curve. This typically means 1-inch or larger sensors, fast lenses, and better low-light performance. W...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-07-31, Author: Jim , review by: pcmag.com

  • Wide-aperture zoom lens. 1-inch image sensor. Strong low light performance. 16.1fps burst shooting. Customizable controls. Large, tilting LCD. Pop-up OLED EVF. Quick autofocus. Raw shooting support. Wi-Fi with NFC. Super slow-motion video. 4K recording.
  • Expensive. Short zoom range. Omits hot shoe. External charger not included
  • The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV offers serious video improvements over the RX100 III, but it is very expensive for a compact camera...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-07-25, Author: Raymond , review by: mashable.com

  • Incredible image and video quality, Super compact design, Ultra-sharp retractable electronic viewfinder, Tiltable display, Faster autofocusing
  • 4K video recording limited to 5 minutes, Weakest battery life of any RX100, Frustrating slow-motion recording, Crazy expensive for a point-and-shoot
  • Sony's RX100 IV is a performance-packed point-and-shoot, but the limited 4K video recording and confusing slow-motion mode isn't worth the $950...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-07-24, review by: cnet.com

  • Great video features to supplement its 4K capabilities distinguish the Sony Cyber-shot RX100 IV from the rest of the advanced-compact pack. It also retains the nice design perks, like a popup electronic viewfinder, of the earlier RX100 models
  • Like its predecessor, the autofocus system could be more consistent and the battery life has gotten even worse
  • A nice choice if your looking for an advanced compact with class-leading video capabilities, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV is a little expensive if you just want a good camera for shooting stills...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-07-15, Author: Michael , review by: gizmodo.com

  • Small and stylish, even with a three old design, Advertisement, Great image quality, Autofocus is improved, Advertisement, Great overall 4K image quality, New sensor tech enables neat tricks like super slow motion, 1/32000 shutter speed, and 16 fps burst
  • Controls are cramped, and they've been that way since 2012, Advertisement, The viewfinder's hampered by awkward mechanics and tiny size, Image quality on super slow motion footage is extremely bad, There's no way to attach an external microphone, Adverti
  • It’s hard to find a great reason to drop $1000 on the RX100 Mark IV. The biggest reason lies in the Panasonic LX100. That camera is cheaper, has better controls, and does 4K video just as good, if not better. Sony’s only technological advantage is the sup...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-07-13, Author: Jeff , review by: dpreview.com

  • Some of the best image quality in any compact camera, ever, Impressively sharp 24-70mm equiv lens remains usefully bright throughout zoom range, Impressive image stabilization for stills, dramatically effective in video, Well implemented Eye AF system tra
  • Extensive feature set overwhelms the user interface, As a twin-dial camera, could be programmed better to make full use of both dials, Expensive compared to rivals, Short battery life, Lock-on AF can be unpredictable and laggy, Lens range will be limiting
  • The RX100 IV gains some headline-grabbing features such as high frame rate and 4K video but it's the smaller features that most impressed us. Continuous eye tracking, fast Raw burst modes with AF, and small user-interface changes have made the Mark IV the...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
 
  Published: 2015-07-11, review by: Kenrockwell.com

  • Abstract:  Sony DSC-RX100 Mark IV (20 MP midsize "one inch" sensor, 8.8-25.7mm f/1.8-2.8 lens (24-70mm eq.), 10.5 oz./298g, about $948). enlarge. I got mine at B&H; I'd also get it at Adorama or at Amazon.This ad-free website's biggest source of support is when you...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-07-01, Author: Lisa , review by: mobiletechreview.com

  • Impressive image and video quality for a camera this small, offers manual controls and RAW. Does high bitrate video recording, 4K and slow motion
  • Very expensive, can only record 4K for 5 minutes at a go, slow motion video quality not high
  • The Sony RX100 IV, like its predecessors, is a marvel of miniaturization. This is quite a powerful camera for its size and it takes photos and videos that look noticeably better than point and shoots. Of course, that comes at a price, and this is a $950 c...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 4 of 17 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 17   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×