uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Olympus E-P2



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Olympus E-P2

Testseek.co.uk have collected 82 expert reviews of the Olympus E-P2 and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Olympus E-P2.
Award: Recommended January 2010
January 2010
 
(79%)
82 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
79 0 100 82

The editors liked

  • Excellent quality viewfider
  • Solidly buily with retro styling
  • Small
  • Especially with the 17 mm lens
  • General handling
  • Electronic viewfinder
  • AF tracking
  • Manual movie mode
  • Good features
  • Good pictures
  • Nice retro styling
  • Impressive images from kit lens Tank-like build
  • Retractable lens mechanism Unusually easy to use
  • Metal build means camera feels built to outlast most competitors in its new-ish class
  • Excellent image quality and evenly exposed results
  • Sturdier than other hybrids
  • Excellent image quality
  • Evenly exposed results
  • Everything that made the E-P1 so easy to recommend remains on its successor. The black metal body will delight fans of retro camera style
  • But it’s about more than looks. The 14-42mm lens which comes as part of the basic bundle is great and gives it a DSLR style feel.Images look stunning
  • With the chance to take pin-hole and diorama shots using the on-board art filters. This is a camera aimed str
  • Striking design
  • Excellent build quality
  • Very good photo quality
  • Design
  • Accessories port
  • Great imaging quality
  • Excellent video controls
  • So much fun to use
  • EVF

The editors didn't like

  • Screen resolution still low
  • Viewfinder takes up the hot shoe
  • Menus are complicated
  • Battery life not good enough
  • Awkward mode dial
  • Slow autofocus
  • Pricey
  • High price
  • No built-in flash
  • Pricey for anyone buying into the new system from scratch
  • Occasional white balance issues
  • Retractable lens has to be unfurled before powering the camera up to prevent error message
  • Kit lens has to be unfurled before powering the camera up
  • At £899 for the basic package
  • You’ll need a lot of spare cash to get involved. That doesn’ tinclude the viewfinder which you’ll need to pay extra for. Also
  • The added features are barely different to the E-P1. That’s not to say this isn’t a stunning
  • Sleek camera that takes truly luscious and detailed shots
  • Just that it costs a tad too much for our liking.
  • Sluggish autofocus
  • Short battery life
  • Low-resolution LCD
  • Lacks on-camera flash
  • No onboard flash
  • Focusing can be a little unreliable
  • Price

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 3 of 9
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2010-08-03, review by: infosyncworld.com

  • We think the Olympus E-P2 is the first PEN camera to leave us with an empty feeling. Not in the still image quality department though—Olympus has really nailed it when it comes to Four Thirds imaging. We're talking about the design of the E-P2. Where'...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-06-24, review by: best4reviews.com

  • Image quality, handling, Super Control Panel, Creative feature set, iAuto mode, Dust reduction system, Styling, Build, Art filters, Lens, EVF.
  • No (built-in) viewfinder, EVF needs hot shoe, No built-in flash, Price, Screen in brighter conditions.
  • While the price of the Olympus Pen E-P2 might make some of your bank managers choke into their morning coffee when asking for the loan you might need to buy one, this otherwise modest upgrade of the E-P1 still sees significant improvements over its p...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(83%)
 
  Published: 2010-04-22, review by: dpreview.com

  • Excellent resolution with lots of detail in the shots, Appealing, bright and punchy out of camera results and well optimized JPEGs, Improved AF performance (though kit lens holds it back), Pretty retro design puts SLR quality into a compact body, Collapsible kit lens is small and offers decent quality, Superb optional viewfinder aids stable holding and shooting in bright light, Good high ISO perf
  • Some highlight clipping (and poor dynamic range at ISO 100), Low resolution screen that's hard to see in bright light, i-Enhance picture mode can't be disengaged when using iAuto, No built-in flash (and the optional flash is expensive and pretty basic), Complicated menu system not that easy to navigate, Preview image brightness doesn't always match the captured image brightness, No quick way to s
  • For this Quick review we ran selected studio tests to confirm the E-P2's image quality is the same as the E-P1's. On the previous pages of this article we have described all specification and performance differences between the two cameras. To get all...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-04-20, review by: imaging-resource.com

  • Small, inspiring design, Mirrorless design allows smaller optics, smaller body, Very compact lens designs, Compatibility with a wide range of existing lens designs using adapters, albeit with limitations, Good heft, but reasonably light at only one pou...
  • Relatively limited Micro Four Thirds lens selection from Olympus (as of April, 2010), Short battery life (especially compared to an SLR), No built-in flash, New accessory port devices hijack flash hot shoe, and don't daisy-chain -- so accessories can't...
  • As an evolution of the E-P1, the Olympus E-P2 retains much of what is great about its predecessor, while building on feedback from the E-P1 to offer some important new features. Key among these features is the accessory port, whose design bears more th...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-03-17, Author: Lori , review by: cnet.com

  • Striking design; excellent build quality; very good photo quality
  • Sluggish autofocus, short battery life, low-resolution LCD, lacks on-camera flash
  • For some, an elegant shooter's design and high-quality low-ISO photos may more than adequately compensate for the Olympus E-P2's sluggish performance. Read full review See all prices

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(74%)
 
  Published: 2010-03-15, review by: whatdigitalcamera.com

  • Retrostyling, incamera image stabilisation, lownoise image quality
  • Autofocus system not as good as competitors, no popup flash

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(88%)
 
  Published: 2010-03-02, review by: wired.com

  • Compact, 12megapixel camera with interchangeable lenses. Giant LCD screen. Great lowlight performance, professional features including full manual control and RAW mode. That design is hot, son. Hot!
  • A good deal more expensive than the nearly identical EP1. Costs about the same as a fullsized DSLR. LCD viewfinder is lowerresolution than the main LCD and is annoyingly laggy. Viewfinder also hogs flash hotshoe

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2010-02-16, review by: digitalcamerareview.com

  • Camera makers have attempted, several times, over the past fifty years to combine the creative potential and flexibility of an interchangeable lens SLR camera with the convenience and usability of a pocket-sized camera. Unfortunately, that's sort of ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-02-12, review by: pcmag.com

  • D-SLR-quality images. Sharp images from ISO 100-800 at all f-stops. Low noise from ISO 100-1600. Attractive design. 720p30 HD video capture. Mini HDMI port.
  • Slow autofocus. No built-in flash. Electronic viewfinder is no match for an optical viewfinder. Camera picks up lens motor noise when shooting video.
  • The E-P2 Micro Four Thirds camera has all the benefits and shortfalls of the less expensive E-P1, but it also includes a detachable electronic viewfinder....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2010-02-04, review by: photographyblog.com

  • With the tweaks and refinements to the Olympus E-P2 being relatively modest, existing E-P1 owners shouldn't feel the need for an upgrade. To sum up, chief 'improvements' are the newly included EVF and port for such, (slightly) enhanced functio...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
    page 3 of 9 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 9   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×