uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Cooling » Cooler Master Hyper 212X CPU cooler



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Cooler Master Hyper 212X CPU cooler

Testseek.co.uk have collected 95 expert reviews of the Cooler Master Hyper 212X CPU cooler and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Cooler Master Hyper 212X CPU cooler.
Award: Most Awarded May 2016
May 2016
 
(79%)
95 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
79 0 100 95

The editors liked

  • Compact and highly compatible design
  • Easy to install
  • Competitive price
  • Respectable performance
  • Improves on original 212
  • Can handle a bit
  • Performs as well as a allinone cooler allowing a good overclock
  • Thought given to presentation and future storage
  • Good value for money based on price per performance

The editors didn't like

  • None
  • Neutral
  • Best suited to systems with milder overclocks or boost clocks
  • “Cooler Master have done it again
  • Delivering the best version yet of one of the best bang for buck coolers on the market that is sure to appeal to a wide range of system builde
  • Installation may be straightforward to understand but it is still challenging to complete

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 2 of 10
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2016-08-01, Author: Simon , review by: tech-review.de

  • Sehr leise, Gute Verarbeitung, Temperaturen immer im guten Bereich, Clevere Montage des Lüfters und zweites Kit, Verpackung des Zubehörs vorbildlich
  • Montage komplizierter als nötig, Temperaturen im Vergleich nicht so ganz gut
  • Im Prinzip kann man mit dem Kühler nicht wirklich etwas falsch machen, auch wenn nicht alles perfekt ist, aber das ist schließlich niemand und vor allem kein Produkt.Der wohl beste Punkt, der für den Cooler Master Hyper 212X spricht, ist seine sehr niedri...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2016-02-19, review by: ocinside.de

  • Der Cooler Master Hyper 212X wurde an einigen Punkten überarbeitet. Wie bereits bei den Leistungsdaten vermutet, erweist sich der neue Lüfter mit seinem nicht so angenehmen Geräuschprofil im höheren Drehzahlbereich jedoch eher als Schwachpunkt. Gefallen h...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-02-17, Author: jamison80 , review by: hardwareinside.de

  • Abstract:  Gerade nach Veröffentlichung einer neuen CPU überlegen sich Viele auch einen neuen Kühler/Lüfter anzuschaffen. Dabei lässt sich grob zwischen zwei gewünschten Arten und dem Mix daraus unterscheiden: Der Wunsch nach gleicher bzw. besserer Leistung und kein...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2016-03-20, Author: Marino , review by: bitsandchips.it

  • CoolerMaster non è come Paganini "che non ripete", e ci insegna ancora una volta che è possibile godere di prodotti dalla caratura elevata senza dover necessariamente accendere un mutuo. I rinnovati Hyper 212x ed Hyper TX3i scendono in campo portando pres...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-02-09, Author: Damiano , review by: coolingtechnique.com

  • ottima qualità dei materiali, sistema di ritenzione di facile utilizzo e modificabile a piacimento, dimensioni contenute, ventola bilanciata, controllo pwm, ottime prestazioni termiche, DCH di seconda generazione, dissipatore di buffer per la gestione de
  • ventola decisamente sottotono, carico elastico delle molle ampiamente conservativo, ventola decisamente sottotono, carico elastico delle molle ampiamente conservativo
  • Attraverso i nuovi Hyper 212X e TX3i Cooler Master cerca di ridare ossigeno a quella che è forse una delle serie più radicate e vecchie all'interno dell'azienda; si tratta di una linea di prodotti che nel corso degli anni è stata capace di racchiudere den...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-27, Author: João , review by: jotareviews.pt

  • Fazendo um breve resumo à comparação entre estes dois modelos, pode-se chegar a uma conclusão… Ambos os coolers são excelentes compras e apresentam uma relação preço/qualidade muito boa, sendo mesmo capazes de arrefecer processadores mais quentes como é o...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(84%)
 
  Published: 2013-03-25, Author: siruf , review by: overclockers.ua

  • Технологию «непрерывного прямого контакта» (CDC), примененную компанией Cooler Master в данных продуктах, можно считать наиболее совершенной реализацией данного подхода в принципе, среди существующих моделей кулеров. Это отлично прослеживается по отпечатк...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-03-18, Author: bauner , review by: hwt.dk

  • Cooler Master Hyper 212X henvender sig til brugeren der ønsker en stille køler og stadig have mulighed for at overclocke sin maskine. Hyper 212X klarede sig glimrende under vores test. Den var meget behagelig at være i stue med p.g.a. det lave støjniveau...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(68%)
 
  Published: 2017-10-07, Author: Krzysztof , review by: ithardware.pl

  • Abstract:  O ile w przypadku procesorów których podkręcać się nie da kupowanie bardzo wydajnych coolerów z reguły mija się z celem - to w przypadku procesorów Intela LGA 115x z odblokowanym mnożnikiem i dopiskiem K w nazwie sytuacja jest zgoła odmienna...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-07-13, Author: Piotr , review by: ithardware.pl

  • Abstract:  O ile w przypadku procesorów których podkręcać się nie da kupowanie bardzo wydajnych coolerów z reguły mija się z celem - to w przypadku procesorów Intela LGA 115x z odblokowanym mnożnikiem i dopiskiem K w nazwie sytuacja jest zgoła odmienna...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 2 of 10 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×