uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 7 2700 3.2GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 7 2700 3.2GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.co.uk have collected 269 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 3.2GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 2700 3.2GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Most Awarded May 2018
May 2018
 
(82%)
269 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
82 0 100 269

The editors liked

  • Faster than previous-gen Ryzen models
  • Bundled cooler adds value
  • Backward compatibility with 300-series motherboards
  • Indium solder improves thermal transfer
  • Great value
  • Huge multi-thread performance
  • Overclockable

The editors didn't like

  • Needs a better cooler for overclocking
  • No value-oriented 400-series motherboards yet
  • Large performance deficit compared to a stock Ryzen 7 2700X
  • Slower single-core performance than Intel
  • Poor overclocking headroom

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 27
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-06-18, Author: Edward , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Great value, Huge multi-thread performance, Overclockable,
  • Slower single-core performance than Intel, Poor overclocking headroom,
  • It's the same old story. AMD's latest chips are great value for certain tasks but less so for others. You get masses of multi-thread performance, but single-thread and gaming performance trails Intel's rival processors a little...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(40%)
 
  Published: 2018-05-25, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  It's the age-old question that has spurred endless debate: AMD or Intel? Today, that rivalry has reached new heights with AMD's Ryzen 2000 Series, often referred to by users (but not AMD) as "Ryzen 2," competing against Intel's 8th Gen "Coffee Lake" for d...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-05-16, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Faster than previous-gen Ryzen models, Bundled cooler adds value, Backward compatibility with 300-series motherboards, Indium solder improves thermal transfer
  • Needs a better cooler for overclocking, No value-oriented 400-series motherboards yet, Large performance deficit compared to a stock Ryzen 7 2700X
  • AMD's first-generation "non-X" Ryzen processors were universally hailed as budget champions. That changes with the company's 2000-series CPUs, though. Its Ryzen 7 2700 is only $30 cheaper than the 2700X. Given a choice between them, we'd rather have the f...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-05-16, Author: Andrew , review by: techteamgb.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Is there any reason to buy an Intel CPU now that the AMD Ryzen 2700 and 2600 are out? Or even reason to get the X variants (2700X & 2600X)? Lets benchmark them and find out! Want one? Amazon 2700: prourls.co/5u0q Amazon 2600: prourls.co/0gwh Products show...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2018-05-06, Author: Peter , review by: eteknix.com

  • For the desktop PC gamer, the higher TDP X models are still the go-to for gaming and general performance though. They're a little faster, and a little more expensive, but you get what you pay for. However, if heat and power are a big concern to you, and t...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-05-06, Author: Peter , review by: eteknix.com

  • I can see the Ryzen 5 2600 and the 2600X fast becoming the most popular chips of the second generation Ryzen launch. They're fast, they're affordable, and they're easy to keep cool and overclock. I mean, if you're just doing a massive amount of rendering...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-05-03, Author: Antony , review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • There are some positives and negatives to take away from this review of the Ryzen 7 2700, and we'll start with the latter. Sadly, it won't overclock to Ryzen 7 2700X speeds (going by our samples), meaning that the small price difference between the two is...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-05-02, Author: Tarinder , review by: HEXUS.net

  • Abstract:  AMD moved the Ryzen Hype Train along a few stations with the release of second-generation models last month. We reviewed the Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 2600X and found them to be solid performers, particularly with respect to multi-threaded performance and...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-12-26, Author: Steve , review by: gamersnexus.net

  • The Intel i7-9700K received ample criticism at unveil for being the first “gaming,” S-class i7 in recent history to drop hyperthreading. The move was accompanied by an increase in physical core count to 8C, but followed the previous move from 4C/8T to 6C/...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-11-26, Author: Steve , review by: gamersnexus.net

  • By name and by marketing, the i5 CPU is most comparable to the R5 CPUs. The R5 2600's current $160 price-point makes it a less direct comparison, and the 2600X, which would perform about where an overclocked 2600 performs, is about $220. This is also che...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 27 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 27   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×