uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 3.7GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 3.7GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.co.uk have collected 503 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 3.7GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 3.7GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice April 2018
April 2018
 
(88%)
503 Reviews
Users
(97%)
243 Reviews
88 0 100 503

The editors liked

  • Even more competitive multi-threaded performance
  • Entire range now arrives with Wraith cooler
  • Improves on every aspect over previous generation
  • Faster and better memory support
  • More aggressive pricing
  • Precision Boost 2 and XFR2 are much improved
  • Ide
  • Solid value
  • Impressive multi-core performance
  • All chips unlocked
  • Lots of motherboard choice
  • Significant performance boost vs. 1800X
  • Bundled coolers
  • Backward-compatible with 300-series motherboards
  • Indium solder
  • Better memory and cache performance
  • Faster and more frugal than before
  • Excellent all round performance
  • Improved overclocking
  • Dramatically improved performance
  • Reasonably priced
  • Useful included CPU cooler and software
  • New 12nm fabrication process
  • Precision Boost 2 works well
  • Taking the 2700X over 4GHz out of the box
  • Memory compatibility does not seem an issue
  • Lower pricing at launch compared to its predecessor

The editors didn't like

  • Still lacks single core performance compared to Intel
  • Struggles in memory intensive applications
  • 105W TDP compared to previous 95W on 1800X
  • Increased power consumption compared to previous Gen
  • Single-thread is better but not great
  • Limited all-core overclocking headroom
  • Limited overclocking headroom
  • No value-oriented 400-series motherboards yet
  • Still slower clock speeds than Intel
  • Slower than Intel for gaming
  • Higher TDP than 1800X
  • Highest-energy draw on load
  • Marginal improvement to be had over 1700X/1800X
  • Power draw could be better
  • Still behind Intel in terms of IPC
  • Limited overclocking potential due to the effectiveness of Precision Boost 2

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 44 of 51
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-10-19, Author: 郎孟华 , review by: zol.com.cn

  • 纠错与问题建议标签:CPU酷睿游戏Intel cpu.zol.com.cn true 中关村在线 report 1363 Intel第九代酷睿系列处理器发布,相关参数也已经完全曝光,今天我们将会检测第九代酷睿处理器首发型号i9-9900K、i7-9700K以及i5-9600K的性能表现,通过首发评测的介绍,想必您可以非常清晰的知道i9-9900K、i7-9700K以及i5-9600K这三款处理器的性能水平,希望可以对您针对...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-10-09, Author: 陈加乐 , review by: itheat.com

  • 新系统无论是从存储方面,还是从网络方面都进行了极大的改变与提升,新系统可操作性与实用性对于玩家来说,可谓是十分友好。在QTS4.3.5的发布会中,威联通负责人也表示,新系统加入更多的功能与设置,满足玩家所有的需要。但是这也是一个矛盾点,功能多了就会复杂化,不过威联通目前已经提供了每个步骤的详细教程,让玩家一打开应用就可以看教程来学习,也算是十分走心啦~-->...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-09-11, Author: 郎孟华 , review by: zol.com.cn

  • AMD Ryzen 7 2700X和AMD Ryzen 5 2600X有什么区别纠错与问题建议标签:CPU酷睿cpu测试cpu性能 cpu.zol.com.cn true 中关村在线 report 859 游戏和显卡一直关系密切,诚然,显卡的性能极大的影响着游戏的运行状况,决定着玩家的游戏体验,而随着游戏不断变大,内容不断丰富,对处理器的需求也是水涨船高,不同于以往的“单核性能决定游戏体验”,游戏新作逐渐开始对多核心并行运算做适配,多核处理器在游戏方面...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-07-30, review by: sina.com.cn

  • 型号的工程样本,但它也可能意味着以前的谣言是错误的,或者软件无法准确地检测到CPU的速度。或者,它可能实际上不是Core i9-9900K。上周外界曝光有关第9代英特尔芯片的更多消息。据传,Core-i9系列将成为新阵容中唯一具备超线程功能的系列。与此同时,德国网站Goldem.de声称,Core i9-9900K和Core i7-9700K都将使用焊接的IHS,其余芯片采用TIM解决方案。声明新浪网独家稿件,未经授权禁止转载。-->...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-07-19, Author: 孙斌 , review by: pcpop.com

  • Abstract:  随着锐龙系列的推出,AMD在处理器市场迎来了属于自己的新时代。不久之前推出的基于Zen+架构的第二代锐龙处理器更是进一步提升了AMD处理器的竞争力。我们之前也已经对这锐龙7 2700X和锐龙5 2600X两款处理器进行过较为全面的测试和解析。不过我们当时主要针对的是处理器的基准理论性能,对游戏方面的关注相对较少。所以我们今天专门写这篇文章就是为了探求一下这两颗处理器在实际游戏中的性能表现究竟能否令人满意。处理器规格一览对位来看,锐龙7 2700X相比酷睿i7-8700K拥有更多的物理核...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-05-30, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • AMD Ryzen 7 2700处理器在规格上,相比7 2700X保持了同样的核心/线程数量、缓存容量,只是频率低了几百MHz,性能损失并不大。而且它们俩依然完全不锁倍频,对于动手能力强的玩家,只需要简单超频设置就能让它拥有比2700X更强的性能,可玩性相当高,性价比非常凸显!另外,锐龙7 2700的热设计功耗都降低到65W,功耗和温度表现更加精细,而且同样附送原装风扇,再加上价格也都各自便宜了200元,对于价格和功耗更敏感的用户来说无疑更加合适。文章最后来看看这两款处理器在CPU天梯图里的排行情况。CP...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-05-26, Author: 晓龙 , review by: lotpc.com

  • Abstract:  时隔RYZEN发布一年,AMD发布RYZEN 锐龙二代,芯片制程上升级从14nm提升至12nm,频率相比之前有了明显的提升,目前最强CPU为Ryzen7 2700X。从价格上看,它的对位是Intel的i7 8700K,那么R7 Ryzen7 2700X和i7 8700K哪个好呢,两者的游戏性能有何区别?一起来看看吧!先来看看两者的参数对比。Ryzen7 2700X比i7 8700K多两个核心四个线程,三级缓存Ryzen7 2700X也稍多。测试平台如下:...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-05-16, Author: Strike , review by: expreview.com

  • Abstract:  AMD的第二代锐龙处理器最主要的改进是把原来的14nm LPP工艺升级为12nm LP工艺,CPU架构也从Zen微调到Zen+,新的架构在缓存与内存延时方面得到了明显的改进,频率也得到了提升,同时Precision Boost与XFR技术也升级到了第二代,两者都较上代有较大的改进,特别是XFR 2现在可以提升全核的频率,所以根据散热器的不同CPU的性能浮动会比较明显,今天我们就要做个测试看看使用不同散热器会对第二代锐龙性能有多大影响。其实我们在首发评测的时候就对XFR 2进行过介绍,不过为了照顾那...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-05-13, Author: 晓龙 , review by: lotpc.com

  • 其实对于R7 2700X和i7 8700K这两款处理器来说,优势各有千秋,i7-8700K更有单线程性能优势,因此能够提升游戏的帧数,而R7 2700X更具有多核多线程优势,在渲染、多任务处理方面更有优势。...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-23, review by: sina.com.cn

  • 关于CPU的性能  如前文所说,2700X和2600X都分别顺利完成了自我超越和对牙膏厂的超越,所以CPU性能这个部分还是很稳的。可见Intel接下来要为Z390搭配八核CPU并不是牙膏厂良心发现,是真的被逼的没办法了。  关于游戏性能  之前Ryzen一直被诟病游戏性能不佳,在这次2700X和2600X都有比较好的提升。虽然不能说全面翻身,但至少已经让Intel很难再随便拉开差距。  关于X470芯片组  可以看得到随着AMD CPU重回高端,主板厂商对AMD主板的态度也明显认真了很多,不过X470...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 44 of 51 « Previous   1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 ... 51   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×