uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4

Testseek.co.uk have collected 137 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4 and the average rating is 90%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4.
Award: Editor’s Choice October 2017
October 2017
 
(90%)
137 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
90 0 100 137

The editors liked

  • 16 cores and 32 threads for $999
  • Extremely fast in multi-threaded tasks
  • Forward-looking X399 platform
  • Quad-channel memory
  • Brings competition back to HEDT
  • Workstation and productivity
  • Price per core
  • Solder
  • Easy to cool
  • Multi-Threaded performance
  • 60 PCIe lanes
  • Superb multi-threaded performance
  • 1950X is the highest-performance consumer CPU available and the 1920X is generally second-fastest
  • Excellent price versus performance even compared to Ryzen 7
  • Quad-channel memory support with high bandwidth results and
  • Amazing multi-core performance
  • Plenty of PCIe lanes
  • Fast memory support
  • Very competitive pricing
  • Strong multi-tasking capabilities

The editors didn't like

  • Single-thread not as good as Intel
  • Game Mode and Creator Mode confusion
  • Modes changes require a reboot
  • Low-resolution gaming performance
  • ” in the review are so depraved you can not even imagine
  • And lacking 1 star out of 10… For what? For not being available for free?
  • Oxymorons
  • Robert Johnson
  • I have to slightly disagree with the gaming analysis. Many times the reason RYZEN doesn't perf
  • Middling single-core performance

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 13 of 14
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: 陳兆宏 , review by: pcdiy.com.tw

  • 從上述的測試結果可以發現,AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X處理器,透過其16核心32執行緒的超多核心設計、搭配8MB L2與32MB L3的快取容量,贏過10核心20執行緒、搭配10MB L2與13.75MB L3快取容量的Intel Core i9-7900X。尤其在系統負荷較重的多工環境之下,Ryzen Threadripper 1950X比Core i9-7900X還能發揮出更好的執行效率,讓整個系統的運作更為順暢。也由於Ryzen Threadripper是擁有超多核心的怪...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-03, Author: Willy.Bill , review by: pcdiy.com.tw

  • Abstract:  一個熱到離開冷氣房上廁所會讓人生不如死,小編實在忍不住了,必須要離開天堂般的冷氣房去解放自我,沒想到打開門時… 包裹?大型垃圾?是誰這麼沒有公德心丟東西在我家門前! 誰知道一回到室內,看到另一位小編Bill竟然把大型垃圾撿回來,還自動自發的就拆開啦!結果Bill一臉驚恐和震驚的看著剛才他自己偷打開的大紙箱… 竟然是AMD(美商超微)的Ryzen標誌,還有著一行小小的…「撒哩哩ㄆㄜ」? 小編看到Bill迅速地把裡頭的東西拿出來,一個華麗的轉身Move—— Bill直接搶過黑色行李箱,拖著...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-21, Author: 米田 , review by: 4gamer.net

  • 前述のとおり7900XではAVX-512が使われてしまうため,1950Xの7900Xに対するスコアはほとんど参考にならない。古典的なx86命令を使うMulti-Media Quad-int Native x1 ALUで,1950Xが約57%高いスコアを示し,またAVX-512を使用しない「Multi-Media Quad-float Native x2 FMA」で18%高いスコアを出しているのが見どころだろうか。対1800Xだと1950Xは総合スコアで約92%高いスコアを叩き出し,個別のテストでも78~1...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: 米田 , review by: 4gamer.net

  • ここでダントツのトップに立ったのはUMAモードの1950Xで,2番手となったNUMAモードと比べて約13%のスコア差を付けている。対7900Xでも約18%高いスコアだ。その7900Xに対して1920XのUMAモードはほぼ互角のスコアを示し,1920XのNUMAモードとの間では約16%のスコア差が生じているのも分かる。いずれにせよ,7-Zipではメモリアクセス遅延よりもメモリバス帯域幅が重要になるという理解でいい。DxO OpticsPro 11 クリエイター系アプリケーションとしては避けて通れず,また,ゲ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: JesuaR , review by: playwares.com

  • Abstract:  지난 2017년 8월 3일 오후 10시, AMD는 RYZEN THREADRIPPER(이하 스레드리퍼)에 대한 언박싱 NDA를 공식 해제하면서, 여러 매체를 통해 일괄적으로 언박싱 기사나 동영상이 노출되었습니다. 플레이웨어즈 역시 시간을 맞추어 기사를 업로드했는데, 리뷰어 샘플치고는 "프리미엄 패키지"라는 말이 잘 어울리는 수준 높은 샘플이라는 평을 받았습니다. 라이젠 시리즈부터 시작된 높은 퀄리티의 리뷰어 샘플이 이번 스레드리퍼에 와서 절정을 맞이하는...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-03, review by: coolenjoy.net

  • Abstract:  AMD RYZEN THREADRIPPER 1950X / 1920X 리뷰어 패키지 살펴보기지난 3월 AMD RYZEN 프로세서의 등장은 그동안 경쟁사가 세워놓았던 데스크탑 CPU 시장의 질서에 커다란 지각 변동을 일으켰으며, 강력한 경쟁력과 멀티 코어 성능을 바탕으로 데스크탑 CPU 시장에 새로운 역사를 써나가고 있다.단순히 쿨엔조이 게시판만 살펴보더라도 AMD RYZEN 프로세서를 사용한 조립, 견적 문의부터 앞으로 출시 예정에 있는 제품까지 유저들의...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-03, Author: 안은월 , review by: playwares.com

  • Abstract:  AMD RYZEN 프로세서가 등장한 이후, 지금까지의 과정은 놀라움의 연속이었습니다. 엔트리급에서부터 HEDT에 이르는 전 프로세서 시장은 지난 몇 년간 인텔의 것이었으나, 인텔 Core i3/5/7 시리즈와 직접적으로 대비를 이뤄 출시된 RYZEN 3/5/7의 네이밍 센스는 인텔의 경쟁 제품이라는 확고한 인식을 심어줄 수 있었으며, 일반 사용자용 데스크탑 제품군에서 인텔 VS AMD라는 구도를 다시 한번 되살리는데 성공했습니다. 현 상태에서 내장 그래...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-07-28, review by: brainbox.co.kr

  • Abstract:  인텔의 코어X 프로세서가 출시 되면서 AMD의 스레드리퍼와 함께 4코어 이상의 멀티 코어 프로세서를 사용하는데 정말이지 최적의 가격대비 환경이 만들어졌다. 아직까지 6코어 이상의 프로세서를 사용하기 위해서는 인텔의 경우 50만원 가까운 프로세서와 X299, 혹은 X99 칩셋 메인보드를 구입해야 했다. 하지만 라이젠7 프로세서가 출시가 되면서 프로세서 및 메인보드 가격이 현실적으로 출시 되면서 많은 분들이 4코어 이상의 프로세서 환경에 대해 높은 관심을...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-07-07, Author: kwan , review by: extremepc.in.th

  • Abstract:  Ryzen AMD ThreadRipper 1920X สำหรับนักทำงาน และคอเกมส์กระเป๋าหนัก...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-29, Author: Audigy , review by: ocstation.com

  • ก็เรียบร้อยไปแล้วนะครับสำหรับการรีวิวแนะนำ CPU จากทางค่าย AMD รุ่นใหญ่ RYZEN Threadripper 1920X 12Core-24Thread ในราคาตัวละ 31,900- บาท ซึ่งจัดว่าเป็นราคาที่ไม่ได้สูงมากเมื่อเทียบกับ CPU รุ่นอื่นในท้องตลาดของคู่แข่งที่อาจจะต้องจ่ายตัวละ 4x,xxx- บาทกันเลยท...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
    page 13 of 14 « Previous   1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×