uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4

Testseek.co.uk have collected 220 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4.
Award: Editor’s Choice August 2017
August 2017
 
(88%)
220 Reviews
Users
(60%)
2 Reviews
88 0 100 220

The editors liked

  • Brilliant unboxing/installation experience
  • Performs well in multi-threaded scenarios
  • Decent thermal performance
  • Supplies up to 66 PCI Express Gen3 lanes
  • Blazes through workstation tasks with ease
  • Incredible multi-tasking potential
  • Competitive 4K gaming performance
  • Easy to overclock (albeit hard to keep cool)
  • 64-PCIe lanes
  • Quad-channel memory support
  • 16 cores and 32 threads for $999
  • Extremely fast in multi-threaded tasks
  • Forward-looking X399 platform
  • Quad-channel memory
  • Brings competition back to HEDT
  • Workstation and productivity applications
  • Price per core
  • Solder
  • Multi-Threaded performance
  • PCIe connectivity
  • Ready for the ultimate mega-tasking
  • Easier to Install than Intel
  • Futureproof expandability
  • Superb multi-threaded performance
  • 1950X is the highest-performance consumer CPU available and the 1920X is generally second-fastest
  • Excellent price versus performance even compared to Ryzen 7
  • Quad-channel memory support with high bandwidth results and
  • Amazing multi-core performance
  • Plenty of PCIe lanes
  • Fast memory support
  • Very competitive pricing
  • Strong multi-tasking capabilities
  • Best single-socket CPU power on the market with most applications
  • Best modelling performance with most applications
  • Best GPGPU performance (when configured optimally)

The editors didn't like

  • Expensive
  • No support for NVMe RAID
  • Poor gaming performance at lower resolutions
  • Requires a very powerful CPU cooler
  • Neutral
  • Some games and software still don’t know what to do with all those cores
  • “It’s not without its problems
  • But to see AMD not only competing but winning in workstat
  • Single-thread not as good as Intel
  • Game Mode and Creator Mode confusion
  • Confusing settings
  • Low resolution gaming performance
  • More power hungry than Intel's rival
  • Switching profiles requires a full restart
  • ” in the review are so depraved you can not even imagine
  • And lacking 1 star out of 10… For what? For not being available for free?
  • Oxymorons
  • Robert Johnson
  • I have to slightly disagree with the gaming analysis. Many times the reason RYZEN doesn't perf
  • Middling single-core performance
  • Expensive overall system price – £1
  • 200 more than AMD-AMD option
  • NVIDIA GeForce graphics not validated for professional applications
  • Behind AMD option for video editing with Adobe applications
  • Price
  • £5
  • 754.00 inc VAT (Buy from Armari HERE)
  • Discuss on

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 2 of 22
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-08-11, Author: Kevin , review by: techradar.com

  • Ready for the ultimate mega-tasking, Easier to Install than Intel, Futureproof expandability
  • More power hungry than Intel's rival, Switching profiles requires a full restart
  • The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X isn't the silicon messiah for all the hype its announcement and launch produced, but that's fine. AMD has produced a very competitive product to go up against Intel's long unopposed Extreme Edition processors.Although the...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-08-11, Author: Jim , review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • The Threadripper 1950X is a seriously fast processor for people who need to do serious work on their PC. Yes, you can buy one and use it in your home PC for gaming, but it's not the best choice if that's all you're going to do. Its Intel rival – the Core...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, review by: vortez.net

  • Brilliant unboxing/installation experience, Performs well in multi-threaded scenarios, Decent thermal performance, Supplies up to 66 PCI Express Gen3 lanes
  • Expensive, No support for NVMe RAID
  • The last 6 months has been a clear warning to manufacturers that being complacent can be rather unwise. AMD has really ignited the desktop CPU market with the release of their Ryzen CPUs and it really goes without saying that for all those involved, never...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Workstation and productivity applications, Price per core, Solder, Multi-Threaded performance, PCIe connectivity
  • Confusing settings, Low resolution gaming performance
  • If you need Threadripper, you'll know it. Heavy multitaskers, streamers, those who regularly use heavily threaded applications or have heavy PCIe requirements will all experience competitive performance. The recommendation comes with a caveat, though; if...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Brad , review by: Digitaltrends.com

  • Amazing multi-core performance, Plenty of PCIe lanes, Fast memory support, Very competitive pricing, Strong multi-tasking capabilities
  • Middling single-core performance
  • Yes. For those who need this sort of a horsepower to render videos and 3D scenes, work with raytraced lighting, or handle major encoding tasks without having to hand over their entire system, the choice is clear. The high-end Threadripper chips offer bett...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Tarinder , review by: HEXUS.net

  • 16 cores and 32 threads for $999, Extremely fast in multi-threaded tasks, Forward-looking X399 platform, Quad-channel memory, Brings competition back to HEDT
  • Single-thread not as good as Intel, Game Mode and Creator Mode confusion
  • AMD has used the word disruptive to describe the new Zen CPU architecture that powers Ryzen desktop CPUs, Epyc server processors and now, in August 2017, a trio of Threadripper chips designed to rip up the existing high-end desktop rule book.Threadrip...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Antony , review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • Abstract:  It's easy to assume, given Intel's dominance over the last few years, that its products filled pretty much every niche and price point you would need whether you're a gamer or content creator. However, even before AMD's return to form earlier this year, e...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-08-14, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.com

  • Abstract:  It's one of the greatest questions of our time: AMD or Intel? Today, that rivalry has entered a new stage of Cinebench taunting as AMD's 2000-series Threadripper processors, commonly known as Threadripper 2, come to market to compete against Intel's Skyla...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-08-06, Author: Jeff , review by: Techreport.com

  • Abstract:  AMD is taking the wraps off its second-generation Ryzen Threadripper CPU lineup this morning, and the company is upping the ante in the war for multithreaded superiority on the high-end desktop. Two new chips for workstation and content creation use—the T...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-07-17, review by: techgage.com

  • Whoa… we've finally arrived. Allow me to reiterate a couple of things said at the outset. First, this is not meant to be an in-depth article, despite the number of benchmarks run. All of these results help paint an overall picture of performance on AMD's...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 2 of 22 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 22   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×