uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core i7 8700K 3.7GHz Socket 1151



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i7 8700K 3.7GHz Socket 1151

Testseek.co.uk have collected 418 expert reviews of the Intel Core i7 8700K 3.7GHz Socket 1151 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i7 8700K 3.7GHz Socket 1151.
Award: Editor’s Choice October 2017
October 2017
 
(88%)
418 Reviews
Users
(92%)
3236 Reviews
88 0 100 418

The editors liked

  • Huge six-core power
  • Highly overclockable
  • Stable and easy-to-use platform
  • Mighty single-core speeds
  • Cheaper than Ryzen 7 1800X
  • Big step forward in price/performance
  • Impressive power efficiency
  • Temperatures remain under control
  • Solid overclocking potential
  • One of the fastest consumer CPUs to date
  • 6 Core 12 Thread design
  • Easily overclocks to 5 GHz on air
  • Can break 5.2 GHz on enthusiast cooling
  • Incredible 1080p gaming performance
  • Competitive 4K gaming performance
  • Powerful performance for productivity
  • Strong performance in games and productivity applications
  • Lower price-per-thread than competition
  • Overclocking headroom
  • One of the best for lightly threaded applications
  • Superfast
  • Mighty single-core speeds and gaming performance
  • Hyper-threading overtakes Ryzen
  • Low-impact overclocking
  • Six cores and high clock speed equals high performance
  • Intel IPC is superb
  • Simple overclocking with Z370 Aorus Gaming 7
  • Prices have been held steady from 7th. Gen

The editors didn't like

  • Doesn't compete with Ryzen 1700 or 1700X on price
  • Not compatible with older motherboards
  • Z370 fails to be a major update to the chipset
  • Not backwards compatible
  • Requires a new Z370 motherboard
  • “Many may be on the fence with the whole Z370 motherboard upgrade
  • But if you’re looking to build a new system right now
  • Or upgrade one that’s got a few years on the clock
  • The i7-8700K is a killer piece of hardware for a
  • Z-series motherboard requirement
  • Overclocking tax
  • High price
  • Cheaper 8-core Ryzens offer similar multi-core performance
  • Overclocking only on K models
  • Requires new motherboard
  • CPU cooling is hindered by TIM. Again
  • 8th Gen. CPU requires a Z370 motherboard

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 35 of 42
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-05-26, Author: 晓龙 , review by: lotpc.com

  • Abstract:  时隔RYZEN发布一年,AMD发布RYZEN 锐龙二代,芯片制程上升级从14nm提升至12nm,频率相比之前有了明显的提升,目前最强CPU为Ryzen7 2700X。从价格上看,它的对位是Intel的i7 8700K,那么R7 Ryzen7 2700X和i7 8700K哪个好呢,两者的游戏性能有何区别?一起来看看吧!先来看看两者的参数对比。Ryzen7 2700X比i7 8700K多两个核心四个线程,三级缓存Ryzen7 2700X也稍多。测试平台如下:...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-05-13, Author: 晓龙 , review by: lotpc.com

  • 其实对于R7 2700X和i7 8700K这两款处理器来说,优势各有千秋,i7-8700K更有单线程性能优势,因此能够提升游戏的帧数,而R7 2700X更具有多核多线程优势,在渲染、多任务处理方面更有优势。...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-21, Author: 晓龙 , review by: lotpc.com

  • 通过对Ryzen 7 2700X进行一番针对处理器的测试,我们发现以下几点明显规律:1、 相比上代Ryzen 7 1800X有非常明显的性能提升,提升幅度在9-13%左右;2、 对比对手i7-8700K,多核多线程性能全面碾压,领先幅度甚至达到30%;3、 对比对手i7-8700K,单核性能相对偏弱。由此,我们发现Ryzen 7 2700X如果纯考虑性能趋向的话,那么它更适合用在对多核支持良好的软件和应用软件当中,比如渲染效果图、视频转码、压缩解压缩、三维动画等等这些环境当中。而在游戏的测试当中,Ryze...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: 孙斌 , review by: pcpop.com

  • 总体来看,第二代AMD锐龙处理器相对于第一代产品的进步还是比较明显的,多线程拥有超过10%的性能提升,更高主频也带来了单线程性能的提高,给游戏性能带来了明显的改善。从性能上来讲,作为在第一代产品上的优化完善,12nm的“Zen+”架构足够令人满意。性价比方面,以Ryzen 7 2700X为例,2699元的上市价格相比前代顶级型号Ryzen 7 1800X 3999元的上市价格有了显著的降低,甚至和目前Ryzen 7 1800X的价格持平。如果考虑到随产品赠送的幽灵Prism散热器,Ryzen 7 2700...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-01, Author: 晓龙 , review by: lotpc.com

  • 一般来说,i7-8700要比i7-8700K单处理器要便宜一两百元,但其实远不止提高这一两百元,其原因就是两者搭配的主板有所不同,i7-8700K因为支持超频,因此需要高规格的Z370主板(后期可能会被Z390主板取代),而i7-8700只需要搭配主流级别的B360主板即可,节省了不少装机预算,从性价比角度来说,i7-8700更为适合选购。...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-01-13, Author: 郎孟华 , review by: zol.com.cn

  • 纠错与问题建议标签:主板酷睿Intel cpu.zol.com.cn true 中关村在线 report 649   第八代酷睿系列处理器已经上市三个多月了,经过初期的抢购加价,到现在已经基本稳定在和发行价相差不多的状态,看来供货的问题得到了不错的解决,目前i7-8700K在京东官方旗舰店已经开始原价出售并且还赠送一个傲腾内存,而天猫官方旗舰店则是预售状态,将会在1月16日...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-01-12, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • Abstract:  AMD 锐龙R5-1600X与Intel酷睿i7-8700K选哪个好?以及R5 1600X和i7-8700K哪个值得购买?针对这类问题,本文就为大家带来了R5-1600X与i7-8700K区别对比详细评测教程,有兴趣的朋友们就来了解下吧,希望可以帮助到大家。一、 前言:六核之争 选AMD还是选Intel?2017年,AMD推出了全新的锐龙处理器,凭借高性能低功耗的Zen架构与八核心十六线程的巨大优势打了英特尔一个措手不及。后者为了与AMD抗衡,慌忙推出了八代酷睿处理器。与以往不同的是,英特尔此...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-01-12, Author: 万风 , review by: mydrivers.com

  • 五、总结:性能差10%价格低一半 锐龙性价比凸显游戏性能:经过前面6款3A游戏测试可以看到,R5 1600X、i7-8700K两款处理器在搭配GTX1080显卡运行《GTA5》时差距最大,达到了22帧,除此之外,大部分游戏均在10帧左右,最小差距出现在《巫师3》中,差距仅3帧,综合上述6款游戏后两者性能差距在10%。换成更高端的GTX1080Ti显卡之后,两套平台的性能都有明显提升,而如果考虑同价位平台,R5 1600X+GTX1080Ti组合的成本支出与i7-8700K+GTX1080基本相当,游戏帧数...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-12-21, Author: 吴紫磨 , review by: zol.com.cn

  • 纠错与问题建议标签:笔记本电脑1W元以上独显笔记本笔记本PK擂台 nb.zol.com.cn true 中关村在线 report 2602 AMD的Ryzen系列处理器在今年掀起了PC市场的反击狂潮,时下R5、R3 系列已经全面铺货,对Intel构成了莫大的压力。全线对垒形式下,笔记本端的APU战线也已经补全, 锐龙7 2700U以极大的优势碾压了默认TDP下的英特尔8代酷睿低电压处理器,更强悍的R5 240...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-12-16, Author: 李想 , review by: zol.com.cn

  • 纠错与问题建议标签:显卡Intel vga.zol.com.cn true 中关村在线 report 679 随着Intel在CPU内部使用硅脂导热技术,开盖换液金似乎已经是成为了日常所需,i7-8700K这颗强大的处理器一上市的售价就超过了3000元,让很多玩家措手不及,但仍然不能阻止这款CPU热销到无货,有同样热度的还有CPU的温度,动辄逼近100度可不是谁都能承受得了的。现在看来,...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 35 of 42 « Previous   1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ... 42   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×