uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core i9 9900K 3.6GHz Socket 1151



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i9 9900K 3.6GHz Socket 1151

Testseek.co.uk have collected 468 expert reviews of the Intel Core i9 9900K 3.6GHz Socket 1151 and the average rating is 86%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i9 9900K 3.6GHz Socket 1151.
Award: Editor’s Choice May 2019
May 2019
 
(86%)
468 Reviews
Users
(93%)
4503 Reviews
86 0 100 468

The editors liked

  • Up to 5GHz Turbo Boost
  • Adept multi-core processing
  • Ideal for multiple uses inc. video editing
  • Excellent overall performance
  • Soldered IHS
  • Excellent IPC
  • Strong multi-core performance
  • Blurs the lines between gaming and HEDT
  • Wide choice of Z390 boards
  • 8-cores
  • 16 threads at long last
  • 400MHz faster than last gen
  • Soldered thermal interface medium
  • Dominating hyper-threading performance
  • Runs significantly cooler
  • Tight energy consumption
  • Ultra-speedy for video rendering and editing
  • Best clock speeds of all the consumer CPUs
  • Intel is finally using solder again for better temperatures and better overclocking headroom
  • Fastest desktop processor from Intel to date
  • The best gaming CPU currently on the market
  • 8 cores and 16 threads of pure performance
  • Good performance
  • Reasonab
  • Eight cores running close to 5GHz
  • Soldered heat spreader helps thermals
  • Compatible with Z370 motherboards
  • Excellent DDR4 memory support

The editors didn't like

  • Small amount of overclocking headroom
  • Expensive when compared to AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
  • 16 PCIe lane functionality only
  • £600 price tag
  • Hardware still susceptible to exploits
  • Gets very hot when overclocking
  • Expensive
  • Little to no improvement for gaming
  • Underwhelming performance for video games compared with the competition
  • Requires powerful cooler to prevent overheating
  • Not much room for overclocking
  • Still expensive compared to AMD's Ryzen processors
  • Very high price
  • Minimal headroom for overclocking
  • Very few games make use of more than four cores
  • This refreshed architecture is still not proofed against security problems

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 6 of 47
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2019-09-03, Author: Nathan , review by: legitreviews.com

  • Abstract:  Geekbench 5 was officially released by Primate Labs today and Legit Reviews has been taking a look at this benchmark in the lab. The release of Geekbench 5 brings new machine learning, augmented reality, and computational photography workloads to the CPU...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-08-21, Author: Nathan , review by: legitreviews.com

  • Abstract:  AMD's new 3rd Gen Ryzen processors that are built on the 7nm manufacturing process helped close the performance gap with Intel when they launched last month. Our testing showed that AMD led many of the heavily threaded tests since they had more cores, bu...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-08-19, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Abstract:  Having tested 3rd-gen Ryzen processors with the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti extensively, our idea behind this new feature is to add mainstream and budget GPUs to the mix in a benchmark run that reflects more settings and resolutions gamers will likely use when tu...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-07-25, Author: Ben , review by: hothardware.com

  • Abstract:  AMD renewed competition in the CPU space back in 2017, when its Zen-based Ryzen processors stormed the scene a couple months earlier than originally anticipated. These processors combined good enough single-threaded performance with many core architecture...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-07-17, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Abstract:  A battle that needs no further introduction, we're pitting the new Ryzen 9 3900X head to head against the Core i9-9900K in 36 games. There's loads of results to go over and this article is solely focused on PC gaming performance. For more context on the c...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-05-08, review by: techgage.com

  • We recently updated our Linux testing suite a wee bit, making minor changes, but at the expense of dropping all single-threaded benchmarks – by accident. We hadn't thought much about every single set of results being hugely optimized for core counts, whic...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-12-26, Author: Steve , review by: gamersnexus.net

  • The Intel i7-9700K received ample criticism at unveil for being the first “gaming,” S-class i7 in recent history to drop hyperthreading. The move was accompanied by an increase in physical core count to 8C, but followed the previous move from 4C/8T to 6C/...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-12-25, review by: benchmarkreviews.com

  • Can't be overclocked and lacks HyperThreading, Conclusion
  • We hope that this article has helped you find the right CPU for your gaming PC. As you can see, it doesn't really matter what your budget is because great gaming CPUs are available within any budget. If you consider yourself to be a casual gamer, a budget...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-11-26, Author: Steve , review by: gamersnexus.net

  • By name and by marketing, the i5 CPU is most comparable to the R5 CPUs. The R5 2600's current $160 price-point makes it a less direct comparison, and the 2600X, which would perform about where an overclocked 2600 performs, is about $220. This is also che...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-11-26, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Battlefield V is playable on quad-cores but you can expect frequent frame dips, resulting in less consistent frame rates. For the most part, we've found that the older Core i5-7600K has been hanging in there pretty well with AAA titles released in 2018, b...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 6 of 47 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 47   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×