uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core i3 530 2.93GHz Socket 1156



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i3 530 2.93GHz Socket 1156

Testseek.co.uk have collected 44 expert reviews of the Intel Core i3 530 2.93GHz Socket 1156 and the average rating is 80%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i3 530 2.93GHz Socket 1156.
Award: Most Awarded March 2010
March 2010
 
(80%)
44 Reviews
Users
(91%)
445 Reviews
80 0 100 44

 

Reviews

page 2 of 5
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2010-07-02, review by: hardwaresecrets.com

  • Abstract:  If you have between USD 115 and USD 120 to spend on a CPU, you have two choices, the Athlon II X4 640 (which is a quad-core CPU running at 3 GHz) or the Core i3 530 (which is a dual-core CPU running at 2.93 GHz). Which one should you buy? That is what ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-05-10, review by: fudzilla.com

  • Abstract:  While a comparable AMD system is a tad cheaper, AMD does not cripple it's chipset and CPUs as much as Intel does. By cost per performance the performance as you have seen is on par, even hyperthreading on the i3 does work well. What is surprising, AMD can cope with Intel even in idle power consumption. As you can see, Intel and AMD are pretty close, but wit..

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-04-05, review by: tomshardware.com

  • While we’ve often seen so-called CPU bottlenecks impeding the performance of our multi-GPU systems, today’s highest-quality gaming test has proven that when it comes to single-GPU systems, even a high-performance card like the Radeon HD 5850 can’t outs...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-03-11, review by: it-review.net

  • Abstract:  It's been awhile since Intel introduced any kind of "Extreme" edition CPU's. The new Core i7 980X represents just that - a new CPU that's supposed to be the fastest, the meanest, the conqueror, the benchmark for all others.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-03-04, review by: pcper.com

  • At the conclusion of my first Clarkdale article I stated this:The exception to this?  Extreme low cost requirements.  You can get aCore i3 processor for $113 that will give you similar levels of CPUperformance but without the Turbo Mode features.  You sti...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-02-24, review by: pcmag.com

  • Abstract:  Editor's Note: Product not yet tested. The following description is from the manufacturer.Upgrade your system with the Core i3-530 and own the processor that speeds up when you do. This CPU features the "Intel graphics technology" with "Intel Clear Vid...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-02-15, review by: techpowerup.com

  • "Northbridge" module integration, New 32 nm process node, Low power consumption and heat output, Exceptional performance for a Dual Core processor, Overclocking potential
  • Quad core price tag for dual core processor, Memory and PCIE controller not in processor core, Older generation memory controller, No IGP control on P55 boards, Half of the Clarkdale chip is pure waste for gamers
  • Core i3 540 is logically faster, but the additional 130 MHz come with a $15 price tag, and that brings this processor into the upper market class, ruled by quad core processors. There's little room here for Core i5 600, let alone Core i3 540, which is...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(88%)
 
  Published: 2010-02-15, review by: extremetech.com

  • Abstract:  Intel made significant waves last month when it released its Clarkdale and Arrandale lines of desktop and notebook processors. The chips, the latest mainstream revision of Intel's Nehalem architecture (which was introduced in 2008), were the first to i...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-02-01, review by: insidehw.com

  • Abstract:  Intel continues the tradition of releasing of weaker models of their current CPU generation right after a serie of the most representative models, so now we finally have Core i3, the weakest but the most attractive CPU of the Nehalem architecture. As b...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-02-01, review by: computershopper.com

  • Speedy for the price, Decent on-chip graphics, Inexpensive
  • Not as fast as AMD's similarly priced offering, Requires newest motherboard chipsets to enable on-chip graphics
  • The Core i3-530 can't keep up with AMD's similarly priced, quad-core Athlon II X4 635, but it does offer good performance and an opportunity to upgrade to Intel's faster chips down the road. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(79%)
    page 2 of 5 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×