uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core i5 750 2.67 GHz Socket 1156



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i5 750 2.67 GHz Socket 1156

Testseek.co.uk have collected 138 expert reviews of the Intel Core i5 750 2.67 GHz Socket 1156 and the average rating is 89%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i5 750 2.67 GHz Socket 1156.
Award: Editor’s Choice September 2009
September 2009
 
(89%)
138 Reviews
Users
(96%)
1178 Reviews
89 0 100 138

The editors liked

  • Very well priced
  • Quite cool running
  • Exceptional performance in both desktop and gaming use
  • Great overclocking for both novice and expert users through the P55 chipset
  • 3 Year Warranty
  • The latest quad-core technology at a reasonable price
  • The latest quadcore technology at a reasonable price
  • Awesome gaming grunt
  • Massive overclocking headroom
  • Low energy consumption
  • Especially while idle
  • Very good gaming performance
  • Quadcore
  • Powerful enough for demanding apps
  • Useful Turbo mode

The editors didn't like

  • Nothing that i can see
  • Requires socket 1156 motherboard and DDR3 memory
  • So not an easy upgrade
  • AMD six-core has better multi-threading
  • New Core i5 760 model is better value
  • No hyperthreading

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 3 of 14
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2010-10-11, review by: hardwaresecrets.com

  • Abstract:  The Core i5 was the second CPU from Intel to come with an integrated memory controller (the Core i7 was the first, while the Core i3 was the third), feature present on CPUs from AMD since the Athlon 64. Core i5 CPUs are based on the Core architecture, ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-06-22, Author: David , review by: techworld.com

  • You don't get multithreaded processing power with the i5-750; as a result, this quad-core suffers on multitasking tests. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-03-29, review by: itp.net

  • The Core i5 750 offers superlative performance, is eager to overclock and at US $192, is temptingly priced as well. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2010-01-14, review by: pcwizkidstechtalk.com

  • PCWizKid is definitely impressed how Intel PCWizKid Recommendedfinally has brought something new and refreshing to the processor market to compete for roughly 200 USD against AMD's latest Phenom II 955 and 965 processors. It's priced right and op...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2010-01-10, review by: it-review.net

  • Abstract:  For about three months now, we have been talking about the next step in Intel's tick-tock strategy of introducing products. All of the new i series CPUs were made using Nehalem architecture, so the new 32 nm CPUs represent only a die shrink, in ca...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-10-18, review by: insidehw.com

  • Lack of support for Intel Hyper Threading didn’t have significant impact of performance levels, except in synthetic benchmarks. Compared to Core i7 920, which has HT and one memory channel more, only real difference can be seen in rendering applicat...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-10-06, review by: itp.net

  • Excellent performance, great overclocking potential and an aggressive price make the Core i5 750 the best mainstream processors we’ve ever tested. Don’t even consider anything else....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2009-09-24, review by: tweaknews.net

  • Availability, Excellent Performance for the Dollar, Very Affordable, Lower Thermal Output, Turbo Technology, Cheaper Dual Channel Memory Support, Excellent Overclocking Potential (Stay Tuned)
  • Socket 1156 Motherboard Upgrade Needed, Different CPU cooler Needed (in most cases)
  • Through testing the i5-750, you will easily find out that this processor coupled with an affordable P55 motherboard would be an excellent upgrade for almost everyone other than the small niche percentage needed serious processing power. Even at the t...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-09-24, review by: techgage.com

  • When Nehalem launched, we received processors that were more powerful than anything we used before, and the brand-new architecture was a lot of fun to experiment with. But as I said before, there were a few reasons why people either chose to go with C...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-09-15, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • So, the new platform has been launched. Is it successful? Yes, more than somewhat. If Core i7 for LGA1366 hadnt spoiled the triumph, we could have compared this situation with the transition from NetBurst to Core 2: when new Mid-End processors were f...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 3 of 14 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 14   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×