Testseek.co.uk have collected 500 expert reviews of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB HBM2 PCIe and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB HBM2 PCIe.
August 2017
(79%)
500 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
790100500
The editors liked
Room for overclocking
Strong performance speeds
Competitive performance
FreeSync 2
HDR
Chill
ReLive and More Gaming Friendly Features
Great Build Quality
LED Lit Logo
Big Improvement over Fury series
HBM2 Memory
Genuine competition to GeForce
Hits GTX 1070 hard
Well suited to QHD FreeSync
Faster than GeForce GTX 1070 FE
30% lower power than Vega 64
Great 1440p performance
Strong competitor for GTX 1070
Good 1440P gaming performance
Operating temperatures are decent
Despite the loud cooler
Cost-effective variable refresh rate gaming solution with a FreeSync monitor
Different software-based power profiles give flexibili
The editors didn't like
Too noisy
Not power-efficient
Rivals offer better value
Blower cooler is a bit noisy and limits overclocking
Neutral
Efficiency is better
But still plenty of room for improvement
“The Vega 56 is one of the best AMD graphics cards to date
Packed full of features that are sure to remain relevant to PC gamer
Needs better cooling
Frustratingly loud
Wattage thirsty
Higher power consumption than GTX 1070
Cooling fan is loud under load
Uncertain value given volatile pricing
High power consumption in the performance-biased ‘Turbo' mode
Loud cooler
Dual 8-pin connectors seems unnecessary and may deter some potential customers
Abstract: Middle-earth: Shadow of War is the sequel to the award-winning Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor, which was released in 2014 and brought to us a sleeper success of a game featuring game mechanics such as the combat system that was inspired by the Arkham ser...
Published: 2017-09-18, Author: Dr. , review by: techarp.com
Ever since we saw AMD Vega running DOOM, we had such high hopes for it. The success of the AMD Ryzen family of processors only buoyed that optimism. However, the AMD Vega turned out not to be the Pascal-killer we thought it would be.On paper, the AMD Rade...
Unlike the RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooled edition which fell quite short of its performance target of the GTX 1080 Ti and barely matched the GTX 1080, the RX Vega 56 is faster than the GTX 1070 FE. Using performance as our primary metric, at $399, the RX Vega 5...
Published: 2017-08-31, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Well I have to say that although I haven't had a chance to check out the multiplayer action yet, I was pleasantly surprised with what I found in the beta experience of Destiny 2. The game looks great, plays well and it's already significantly more polishe...
Published: 2017-08-30, Author: Chris , review by: tomshardware.com
Faster than GeForce GTX 1070 FE, ~30% lower power than Vega 64, Great 1440p performance
Higher power consumption than GTX 1070, Cooling fan is loud under load, Uncertain value given volatile pricing
Radeon RX Vega 56 has the potential to be a GeForce GTX 1070 killer if AMD can make enough of them to hit its pricing target. Although the card uses a lot of power, kicks out quite a bit of heat, and makes more noise than the competition under load, p...
Published: 2017-08-25, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Vega 64 is slightly slower than the GTX 1080, while the liquid cooled version wins more than it loses against the GTX 1080
Poor availability and thus pricing. AMD's aircooled RX Vega 64 reference card is ~5% slower than the GTX 1080 FE despite being hotter, louder and using more power (though we have high hopes for custom cards)
After gaming with the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 we are left with a better feeling compared to AMD Radeon RX Vega 64. We are not left wanting. Performance is good at default, providing better performance and gameplay experience compared to Founders Edition GeF...
Was this review helpful?
Award
-
Published: 2017-08-22, Author: Tom , review by: overclock3d.net
Given the slightly underhanded way in which AMD launched the Vega at one price point so that the launch reviews were written under the misapprehension that the card was £449 when it's actually £549, we won't do our usual thing of not really taking the pri...
Published: 2017-08-21, Author: Ryan , review by: anandtech.com
Bringing this review to a close, if it feels like Vega has been a long time coming, it's not just your imagination. AMD first unveiled the Vega name 17 months ago, and it was 7 months ago when we got our first peek into the Vega architecture. So today's l...
