uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Graphic cards » PCI-Express » AMD Radeon R9 295 X2 8GB GDDR5 PCIe



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Radeon R9 295 X2 8GB GDDR5 PCIe

Testseek.co.uk have collected 141 expert reviews of the AMD Radeon R9 295 X2 8GB GDDR5 PCIe and the average rating is 86%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Radeon R9 295 X2 8GB GDDR5 PCIe.
Award: Highest Rated April 2014
April 2014
 
(86%)
141 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
86 0 100 141

The editors liked

  • Obscenely fast
  • Very smooth performance
  • Perfect candidate for 4K gaming
  • Runs relatively cool and reasonably quiet
  • More than two R9 290Xs
  • Incredible cooling performance
  • Better value than GTX Titan Z
  • Offers a huge amount of performance – 4K 60Hz ready
  • Convenient all in one CrossFireX solution
  • Represents a huge improvement over past AMD Dual GPU solutions
  • Fastest graphics card that money can buy
  • Looks set to be at least half the price of the Titan Z from Nvidia
  • Ultra HD 4K leader
  • We love the flight case
  • No maintenance watercooling system

The editors didn't like

  • May require a new PSU
  • Price
  • But that is the nature of the beast
  • Coil whine
  • High power consumption
  • Power delivery outside ATX spec
  • A risky game to play – lowers efficiency and strains PSUs
  • Loud fans even though temperatures are low
  • Eye-wateringly expensive
  • Needs some fine tuning
  • Can get quite loud under load when the water heats up
  • Smallish cooling system has to work hard
  • 240mm radiator and dual fans would have performed better
  • Needs a beefy
  • High quality power supply
  • Kitguru says
  • Look up the word ‘performance' in the Englis

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 3 of 15
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2014-12-30, review by: tomshardware.com

  • It's no surprise that Far Cry 4 will tax your PC hardware, particularly considering its predecessor. However, if you're not gaming on a high-resolution monitor, you can muster an enjoyable experience from Nvidia's sub-$100 GeForce GT 730 GDDR5 at 720p. Ev...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-07-08, Author: Earthdog , review by: overclockers.com

  • Boy oh boy oh boy. What a ride this card has been. AMD really went through a lot of effort to bring this unique card to market, being their first dual GPU solution that is not cut down in some way. Here the two R9 290x cores have full Stream Processors,...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2014-06-08, Author: Sergey , review by: xbitlabs.com

  • Now let's do some math. First of all, the new AMD Radeon R9 295X2 has twice more GPUs than the Radeon R9 290X and clocks them at a 1.8% higher frequency. Second, the marketing department may claim the new card has twice the graphics memory, but that's not...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-05-23, Author: Joel , review by: pcmag.com

  • Incredible cooler keeps GPU temps low. Great 4K performance.
  • Expensive. Requires beefy Power Supply Unit (PSU) capable of providing 500 watts of power
  • The AMD Radeon R9 295X2 is an incredible high-end, multi-core GPU that will really come into its own when 4K gaming becomes more commonplace....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2014-04-29, review by: hardocp.com

  • If you want the absolute best gameplay experience at huge resolutions, AMD has the GPUs that you need, and two Radeon R9 295X2 cards will cost you $3,000. Value of halo products is almost always totally subjective, so we will leave that call up to you.The...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2014-04-29, Author: Ryan , review by: pcper.com

  • We already discussed some of the power concerns on the first page and our need to hook up an auxiliary PSU to our primary 1200 watt unit to keep things running nice and stable. So how did it really look from total, at the wall, power draw?Yikes! At 1,261...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-04-21, Author: Chris , review by: tomshardware.com

  • At no point in time have we ever seen good scaling from four GPUs, and we've never suggested that an enthusiast would be wise slinging a quartet of graphics cards together from any vendor, including Nvidia. With that said, we had a good experience with ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-04-11, Author: Ryan , review by: anandtech.com

  • Bringing this review to a close, when I first heard that AMD was going to build a full performance dual Hawaii GPU solution, I was admittedly unsure about what to expect. The power requirements for a dual Hawaii card would pose an interesting set of chall...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-04-09, review by: vrworld.com

  • The Radeon R9 295X2 is a $1,500 card. There's no getting around that. In fact, it makes a lot of sense if you think about it. The R9 290X should sell for around $550, even though there's still a fair amount of gouging as a result of last year's cryptocurr...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2014-04-08, review by: pcper.com

  • There are a couple of things I don't like about the Radeon R9 295X2 that mainly focus on the power requirements. Forcing users, even those willing to shell out $1500 for a graphics card, to understand power supply rails and combined amperage on power draw...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 3 of 15 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 15   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×