Testseek.co.uk have collected 344 expert reviews of the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe.
June 2015
(85%)
344 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
850100344
The editors liked
AMD back in the big league
Competitively priced
Runs cool under load
Very quiet
Innovative HBM memory
Looks the business
Outstanding performance
Silent operation at low load levels
Almost 100% scaling in several tests
4GB is definitely not a limiting factor
Compact
Attractive
Stock liquid cooling
Competitive performance-per-watt
Flawless 1080p and 1440p performance
Solid 4K framerates
Cheaper than flagship cards
Super quiet fan
Physically small
Ideal for specific system builds
HBM is likely the future of GPU design
AMD's greatest single GPU card yet
Strong 4K performance
The editors didn't like
Not quite as fast as GTX 980 Ti
4GB may prove a hurdle at 4K
No overclocking on memory
No HDMI 2.0
Drivers proved problematic in some games
Early adopter premium
“This crossfire set-up isn’t for those with a small budget or small case or small power supply
But it is a seriously good option is you want to go 4K and take on a brand new technology with
Open-world, Gorgeous Visuals and impressive Graphics on PC, Polished PC Performance with Mod Support, Modern Combat is fun and engaging, All Current and Future DLC supported
Repetitive Side quests may get tedious, Linear gameplay at the end of the game, Story issues with pacing and confusing,
Abstract: Final Fantasy XV is the latest installment in Square Enix's smash-hit RPG series. While the console version was released in 2016, PC gamers now get to play the game with significantly improved visuals. The game is more focused on open world gameplay tha...
Published: 2017-11-04, Author: Mark , review by: overclock3d.net
To put things simply, Call of Duty: WWII is a game of two halves, singleplayer and multiplayer. On Steam, both halves of the game are available as separate downloads and both contain their own separate graphical options menus, highlighting one simple fact...
Published: 2017-10-26, Author: Mark , review by: overclock3d.net
Even before the game's official launch, PC has been heralded as the best platform to play Destiny 2, acting as the only platform that can play the game at 60 FPS (or higher) framerates and with the precision controls that can only be provided with a keybo...
Abstract: Middle-earth: Shadow of War is the sequel to the award-winning Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor, which was released in 2014 and brought to us a sleeper success of a game featuring game mechanics such as the combat system that was inspired by the Arkham ser...
Published: 2017-09-24, Author: Mark , review by: overclock3d.net
When push comes to shove, Project Cars 2 can be an exceptionally demanding game on PC. There is no getting away from this simple fact, though to say that this game is a "unoptimised" or "badly made" would be doing a huge disservice to both your our reader...
Abstract: AAA gaming has changed since the original Final Fantasy game released for the Nintendo Entertainment System. Iconic characters, amazing music, and fantastic stories give the series the esteem it has today, but since then the landscape has changed...
Published: 2017-08-31, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Well I have to say that although I haven't had a chance to check out the multiplayer action yet, I was pleasantly surprised with what I found in the beta experience of Destiny 2. The game looks great, plays well and it's already significantly more polishe...
Published: 2017-08-30, Author: Mark , review by: overclock3d.net
Even before the game's official launch, PC has been heralded as the best platform to play Destiny 2, acting as the only platform that can play the game at high 60 FPS (or higher) framerates and with the high levels of precision control that can only be pr...
Published: 2017-08-25, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Vega 64 is slightly slower than the GTX 1080, while the liquid cooled version wins more than it loses against the GTX 1080
Poor availability and thus pricing. AMD's aircooled RX Vega 64 reference card is ~5% slower than the GTX 1080 FE despite being hotter, louder and using more power (though we have high hopes for custom cards)
