uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Graphic cards » PCI-Express » AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe

Testseek.co.uk have collected 162 expert reviews of the AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe.
Award: Good Buy September 2015
September 2015
 
(82%)
162 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
82 0 100 162

The editors liked

  • Best SFF performance
  • True innovation
  • Lots more perf with OC
  • HBM memory
  • Looks the business
  • Great performance
  • Quiet operation at low loads
  • HBM is innovative
  • Extremely low power consumption for performance
  • Compact size is ideal for small form factor
  • High
  • End gaming performance
  • Efficient for a Fiji GPU
  • Teeny weeny
  • Great performance for its size
  • Arguably preferable to the Fury X
  • Tiny design – small enough for mini-ITX
  • Stonking performance at high resolutions
  • High Bandwidth Memory used
  • Brings new levels of performance to the SFF graphics card market
  • Comfortably outperforms other SFF offerings (GTX 970 and R9 380)
  • Capable of playable 4K performance
  • Cooling solution keeps the GPU temperatures in line
  • Cooling solution is not loud enoug

The editors didn't like

  • Clear coil whine on sample
  • No overclocking on memory
  • No HDMI 2.0
  • Crossfire R9 Nano’s defeats the ideal of small form factor suitability
  • Neutral
  • 4GB HBM is good for now
  • But very little future-proofing
  • “The R9 Nano in Crossfire is an amazing achievement for AMD and a great step in the right direction for the future o
  • Super
  • Expensive
  • Size is less of a mini
  • ITX issue now
  • 4GB HBM limit
  • Coil whine
  • Other cards already accomplish its goal
  • Can't handle 4K in every game
  • Ruinously expensive
  • High-pitched capacitor whine
  • A little slower than current flagships
  • Retail price is significantly above its closest performance competitor (the GTX 980)
  • Cooler design exhausts some air directly into the chassis
  • Rear components can get hot and there is no backplate
  • No native HDMI 2.0

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 17
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-02-14, Author: Farzin , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Both Warhammer and Total War are popular game series, however this isn't the only reason as to why the new game Total War: Warhammer is interesting. The game also has a DirectX 12 mode. In this review we test Warhammar with 20 GPUs in DirectX 12: the numb...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-11-02, Author: Rikki , review by: eteknix.com

  • Great performance, Quiet operation at low loads, HBM is innovative, Extremely low power consumption for performance, Compact size is ideal for small form factor,
  • Crossfire R9 Nano’s defeats the ideal of small form factor suitability, Neutral, 4GB HBM is good for now, but very little future-proofing, “The R9 Nano in Crossfire is an amazing achievement for AMD and a great step in the right direction for the future o
  • PriceSince the initial launch of the R9 Fury X, HBMv1 stock levels and prices have plateaued. This has resulted in the R9 Nano being available for as little as £469.99 from OverclockersUK. In the US, the R9 Nano range has slightly dropped in price and can...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2015-10-05, Author: Andrew , review by: techteamgb.co.uk

  • Well worth the Gamer Approved Award.

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(92%)
 
  Published: 2015-09-26, Author: Dave , review by: techradar.com

  • High, end gaming performance, Efficient for a Fiji GPU, Teeny weeny
  • Super, expensive, Size is less of a mini, ITX issue now, 4GB HBM limit, Coil whine
  • The Radeon R9 Nano matches impressive scale with high-end performance, but the price is prohibitive especially when size is really not so much of an issue anymore...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-09-21, Author: Mike , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Tiny design – small enough for mini-ITX, Stonking performance at high resolutions, High Bandwidth Memory used
  • Ruinously expensive, High-pitched capacitor whine, A little slower than current flagships
  • AMD's latest card is one of its most outlandish and impressive. It's the first time I've seen true high-end power inside a card that's small enough to comfortably fit inside a mini-ITX chassis – and it achieves this without becoming too hot or loud. It...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-09-16, review by: Digitaltrends.com

  • Great performance for its size, Arguably preferable to the Fury X
  • Other cards already accomplish its goal, Expensive, Can't handle 4K in every game
  • The R9 Nano is a novel idea for a card. It's built on the theory that gamers want a card with high performance in a small package. Whether that's true or not remains to be seen, but either way, the R9 Nano is unlikely to satisfy those in the market for...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2015-09-10, Author: Richard , review by: eurogamer.net

  • The R9 Nano packs an unprecedented amount of rendering power into an absolutely tiny product, and possesses superb build quality. The background 'buzz' on our sample is a concern, but in terms of the overall cooling assembly, it works very well - the Nano...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-09-10, Author: Stuart_Davidson , review by: hardwareheaven.com

  • A product which pushes boundaries… sometimes too far. Not cheap but for certain consumers who want to work around its issues this will be a product which brings new performance levels to small form factor systems...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-09-10, Author: Tarinder , review by: HEXUS.net

  • Best SFF performance, True innovation, Lots more perf with OC, HBM memory, Looks the business
  • Clear coil whine on sample, No overclocking on memory, No HDMI 2.0
  • AMD most likely understands that it won't have clear consumer GPU performance leadership in this round of launches, with the GeForce GTX Titan X and partner-clocked GTX 980 Tis holding a reasonable advantage at a 4K resolution.But winning the hearts...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2015-09-10, Author: Igor , review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Enthusiasts fond of space-saving gaming PCs have dreamed of a graphics card that runs as fast as a factory-overclocked Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 at Full HD resolution, and even faster at Ultra HD, while being smaller, lighter and even a bit less power hungry...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
    page 1 of 17 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 17   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×