Testseek.co.uk have collected 99 expert reviews of the Crucial / Micron 2.5 inch RealSSD C300 Series SATA600 and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Crucial / Micron 2.5 inch RealSSD C300 Series SATA600.
October 2010
(84%)
99 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(80%)
214 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
84010099
The editors liked
Superfast in use
Easy to set up
Excellent performance in most areas
Blistering sequential read speeds
TRIM compatible
Sandforce beating IOPS in some tests
Best 4k performance on test
Beats Sandforce drives in our Index
SATA-III support
Outstanding read performance
Better than decent write speed
Value for money
SATA 6Gb/s support
Excellent performances in sequential access (over 300 MBps in read mode!)
SATA3 interface (good for sequential access)
The editors didn't like
Will require a Sata 3 (6GB/s) port or adapter to achieve full performance
Some caution required on installation
Still very expensive
Lowish sequential write speed may be offputting for some
Marvell controller slightly unknown
Inferior access times penalise performance in certain practical tests
Extreme All-Around Performance, Large Capacity, SATA III Support, Strong Small File Transfers, Great Write Performance
Predictably Pricey, Not Yet Available
Over the past few months, a number of excellent solid state drives have landed in the HotHardware labs, each with their own strengths and weaknesses. There was a time when choosing one SSD over another meant making compromises in one area or another, but...
Native TRIM Garbage Collection, Sanitary Erase, and SMART, Good enthusiast-level operational I/O performance, Lightweight compact storage solution, Resistant to extreme shock impact, 128 or 256GB of SSD storage capacity, 5-Year Crucial limited product ...
Expensive enthusiastlevel product, Lacks integrated USB MiniB data connection
Benchmark Reviews begins our conclusion with a short summary for each of the areas that we rate. The first section is performance, which considers how effective the Crucial RealSSD-C300 SATA-III 6.0Gbps SSD performs in operations against direct competi...
Very fast read performance, First SATA 6Gbps drive on the market, Exceeds rated read performance, Supports TRIM, SMART and SE, Fast read and write speeds on 4K random tests
3 year warranty seems a bit low, Slower write speeds that Crucial's earlier M225 SSD
Looking through the benchmarks, at times our setups do become a bit wobbly, especially the older C300 one. For the most part, though, we can see performance is extremely strong on the new m4 setup with some of the best gains being shown under HD Tune...
Published: 2010-05-20, Author: Chris , review by: tweaktown.com
Going into this article, I knew that the Crucial RealSSD C300 in 128GB capacity had a write disadvantage when compared to the 256GB drive that we tested on launch day. The important thing to understand is that Crucial knew that as well and even thou...
Published: 2010-02-23, Author: Chris , review by: tweaktown.com
With enthusiast motherboards now breaking the 400 USD mark not everyone is comfortable with purchasing a new board on an impulse buy like what would happen just a few years ago. Motherboard manufacturers have taken a play from the video card manufa...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2010-02-03, Author: Chris , review by: tweaktown.com
Half way through my testing I shot an email over to Crucial asking why they didn’t tell me that the C300 was so fast. At this point I feel a little silly going on and on to all of my friends about how fast the SandForce drives are. You would think...
Avant de passer aux recommandations à proprement parler, nous tenons une nouvelle fois à porter votre attention sur cette manie qu'ont les constructeurs d'afficher sur les fiches produit des débits en écriture très élevés alors qu'ils ne sont pas valab...
Abstract: A tout seigneur, tout honneur ! Après avoir passé au crible de 58 tests tirés de 6 benchmarks différents, nous vous proposons ce comparatif un peu revisité. D'accès plus simple et plus clair (du moins l'espérons nous) grâce à un nouveau tableau de syn...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2011-05-02, Author: Marc , review by: hardware.fr
Pourtant comme nous avons pu le voir dans nos tests pratiques les versions 64 Go, que ce soit en C300 ou en M4, n'ont pas à rougir face aux versions à plus grosse capacité. Si le C300 pouvait souffrir dans de rares cas de son débit en écriture séquentiel ...
