Testseek.co.uk have collected 230 expert reviews of the Samsung 2.5 inch 850 Evo Series SATA600 and the average rating is 89%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung 2.5 inch 850 Evo Series SATA600.
December 2014
(89%)
230 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(93%)
11674 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
890100230
The editors liked
Consistently fast performance across all workloads
Low launch price
Only ~20% more than the previous generation's current price
Improved performance in high queue depth tests
RAPID Technology
3D VNAND
5 year warranty
6.8mm Height
The largest consumer SSD
The fastest consumer SSD
Massive spare and SLC area
The best SATA SSD
Samsung SATA (high) performance
Low cost
Support for Magician and Rapid Mode
Consistent performance
– 5 year warranty
Mediocre
The technology is “top end” but limited by the SATA3 (6GB/s) interface
Blistering speeds
5 Year Warrany
Slimline
Mammoth 2TB capacity
Almost matches Pro drive for speed
The editors didn't like
Performance delta between 850 Evo and 840 Evo is small
Score
8 / 10
Not much faster than an 840 EVO in some tests
Pricing
Low warrantied endurance rating
Limited availability
Single and low capacity (at the time of writing)
Reduced warranty compared to 850 EVO
Bit too expensive to “compete” with other brands
– Not much of a jump “if any” from the original 840 EVO
„Medis“ iš naujausios kartos „Samsung“ SATA SSD kaupikliųRengdami apžvalgą išsikėlėme tris esminius klausimus. Pirmas – ar 860 Pro yra spartesnis už 850 Pro? Antras -ar 860 EVO yra spartesnis už 850 EVO? Ir trečias – 860 EVO ar MX500 renkantis 500 GB talp...
4、PCMark8硬盘测试PCMark8是全面系统且专业的测试方式，为用户的PC进行性能评定。它对于操作系统的要求至少是Win7，当然作为专为Win8量身定制的软件，对于Win8的支持则是最完美的。诸如Vista及WinXP是完全无法运行该软件的。PCMark8内置了多个测试项目，其中Storage测试项目针对硬盘性能做出评定，包括两款游戏以及各种办公应用测试。分别为《魔兽世界》和《战地3》的游戏载入测试，Photoshop，Adobe InDesign，Adobe After Effects，Adobe...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2015-07-08, Author: James , review by: pconline.com.cn
IOMeter随机性能：文件、Web服务器没什么特别的，不升也不降。数据库、工作站部分，850 Pro 2TB表现正常，850 EVO 2TB则很奇怪，低队列深度下性能很低，超过16之后才提上去。感觉可能和其SLC缓存机制有关，怀疑优化不到位所致。IOMeter平均传输时间(越短越好)：考察的都是低队列深度，850 EVO 2TB彻底不行了，数据库、工作站性能依然都差得多。YAPT随机读写：该测试不考虑4K对齐，很多固态硬盘都会败下阵来。三星的表现一直不错，但是850 EVO 2TB又出事儿了，尤其是小区...
