uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Harddrives » SSD » SanDisk 2.5 inch Ultra Plus Series SATA600



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of SanDisk 2.5 inch Ultra Plus Series SATA600

Testseek.co.uk have collected 103 expert reviews of the SanDisk 2.5 inch Ultra Plus Series SATA600 and the average rating is 81%. Scroll down and see all reviews for SanDisk 2.5 inch Ultra Plus Series SATA600.
Award: Most Awarded May 2013
May 2013
 
(81%)
103 Reviews
Users
(78%)
219 Reviews
81 0 100 103

The editors liked

  • Price point is decent
  • Good performance with compressible and incompressible data
  • IOPS performance is above average
  • Decent midrange performance
  • Uses inhouse NAND and firmware
  • Available to OEMs in mSATA X110 form
  • Good price per GB
  • Solid but not stellar performance
  • Impressive 4K random result

The editors didn't like

  • A lot of competition
  • A marginal price drop would help
  • Outperformed by market leaders
  • Kitguru says
  • A solid all round purchase
  • Especially if you need to deal with incompressible and compressible data on a regular basis
  • Rating
  • 8.0
  • Pages
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6
  • Isn't always as fast as competing SSDs
  • Write speed could be better

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 5 of 11
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-11-19, Author: Nimish , review by: digit.in

  • nCache, Good performance, Cost per GB is reasonable by SSD standards
  • No SSD tray, No external casing
  • Don't like the speed you get with your regular HDD? Thinking of getting an SSD? You can consider this one. Read on to find whether this fits your performance criteria...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2013-05-09, Author: JeeYee , review by: chip.com.my

  • Affordable, Low powered, Good performances
  • Plasticky build
  • Besides the rather questionable build and weight, the SanDisk Ultra Plus SSD is a good SSD pick if you're looking for an affordable, low-powered solution for desktops or media centres. You can't go wrong with this one.(previously published in issue April...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-04-06, Author: Mohannad , review by: tbreak.ae

  • The SanDisk SSD outperforms the Kingston in the Sequential Read and Write tests but the Kingston drive proved to be faster in the rest of the tests. Do keep in mind that the SanDisk 128GB Ultra Plus is considerably cheaper currently selling on Amazon fo...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(78%)
 
  Published: 2013-07-28, Author: colin , review by: cozylittlehaven.net

  • Abstract:  Having already owned the SanDisk Extreme® Solid State Drive and been satisfied with the performance thus far, I decided to go for another SanDisk SSD to upgrade Annabelle's laptop which is still running on the conventional 5400rpm hdd. This time round, it...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-02-03, Author: Lennard , review by: vr-zone.com

  • Abstract:  Before we embark on long-term endurance testing on the drive, we take a quck look at the latest market entrant from Sandisk which uses a Marvell 88SS9175 controller and 19nm MLC NAND.In a bid to increase storage densities and performance, deep pocketed co...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-01-31, Author: geekosa , review by: overclockingmadeinfrance.com

  • prix !!, performances en copie
  • Nous avons testé un SSD cette fois-ci plus entrée de gamme que les autres. Cela permet de voir les différences qu'il peut y avoir entre un SSD moins cher et un autre plus cher.Ici, il n'y a pas de secrets, si ce Sandisk est vendu moins cher que la plupart...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2013-11-15, review by: hardware.fr

  • Avant de passer aux recommandations à proprement parler, nous tenons une nouvelle fois à porter votre attention sur cette manie qu'ont les constructeurs d'afficher sur les fiches produit des débits en écriture très élevés alors qu'ils ne sont pas valab...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-04-22, Author: Lundi , review by: 59hardware.net

  • Performances stables, disque efficace, Aussi bon vide que plein, Positionnement tarifaire hors pair
  • Tolérance à l'usure de la NAND
  • 160 € pour 238 Go disponibles et des performances on ne peut plus honnêtes. 2013 a enfin les couleurs que l'on attendait pour les SSD, qui, il faut l'avouer, stagnent plus qu'ils ne progressent dans beaucoup de segments. La consolidation des performances...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2013-03-27, Author: Mathieu , review by: laruche.com

  • Performances convaincantes, Fonction nCache bien pensée, Prix compétitif
  • Bundle de base sans kit de conversion
  • Très honnêtement, nous n'attendions pas l'Ultra Plus de SanDisk à ce niveau de performances. Pourtant, il ne se prive pas de venir titiller les tous meilleurs SSD du marché (sans toutefois les dépasser), et ce à un prix au Go très intéressant. Un disque f...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2013-03-24, Author: Pierre-Jean , review by: Lesnumeriques.com

  • Bonnes performances globales, Puces mémoire de type MLC (3000 cycles d'écriture/lecture), 37 grammes et 7 mm d'épaisseur, parfait pour un notebook, Rapport Prix / Go intéressant
  • Le Samsung 840 Pro reste plus rapide, Pas de kit pour ordinateurs fixes, 3 ans de garantie contre 5 ans pour certains modèles concurrents
  • Avec cet Ultra Plus, Sandisk prouve qu'il a une bonne place à tenir sur le marché du SSD. En plus d'offrir un rapport capacité / prix intéressant, ce SSD se révèle rapide, léger et compact (7 mm d'épaisseur). Il convient donc parfaitement à tous les noteb...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 5 of 11 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×