Testseek.co.uk have collected 101 expert reviews of the Asus UX501JW Zenbook Pro and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Asus UX501JW Zenbook Pro .
May 2015
(79%)
101 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(76%)
44 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
790100101
The editors liked
Great design and build quality
Fast hardware
Decent trackpad
Large battery
Excellent price
Bright
Vibrant UHD display
Capacious
Highly responsive storage
Stylish design
Quality chassis
Doesn't heat up much
Very slim
Matte display
Powerful CPU/GPU duo
Powerful performance
Up-to-date hardware
Sharp screen
The editors didn't like
Colorinaccurate and extremely glossy display
The keyboard and the speakers are a downgrade over the previous generation
Prachtig scherm, Super snelle SSD (en snelle, overige hardware), Touchscreen, Erg lichtgewicht voor deze prestaties
Glanzend scherm, Prijzig, Backlight toetsen in donkere ruimte redelijk storend
Super snelle en krachtige notebook met een prachtig scherm voor een stevige prijs. De bouwkwaliteit en uitstraling, gecombineerd met de prestaties maken deze notebook zijn prijs redelijk waard. Als je enkel lichte werkzaamheden doet, is deze notebook niet...
Şu ana kadar test ettiğimiz en hızlı SSD, Mükemmel genel sistem performansı, Güçlü 4 çekirdekli işlemci, Güçlü harici grafik kartı, İyi klavye, İlgi çekici kasa tasarımı, Sıcaklık ve ses üretimi iyi yönetilmiş
Oldukça yansıtmalı ekran, Ekrana sarımsı kaplama, Hoparlörlerin düşük ses çıkışı, Batarya kullanım süreleri, Gereksiz zahmetli bakım işlemi
作为华硕顶级产品，ZENBOOK Pro UX501拥有较为精细的机身模具， 相对纤薄的外观设计，4K分辨率超清显示屏，性能强劲的四核八线程酷睿处理器，专为游戏打造的GTX 960M独显，512GB超大容量SSD固态硬盘，和12999元的高售价，虽然对于普通用户而言很难入手，但华硕ZENBOOK Pro UX501的品质确实够得上这个价位，如果想体验一把高级笔记本的感觉，华硕ZENBOOK Pro UX501是个不错的选择。...
最后，我们来看看外媒的评价吧。Gizmodo认为，华硕ZenBook Pro UX501并不能战胜MacBook Pro Retina，4K屏幕看上去不错，但并未发挥真正的意义，包括4K视频都不能获得最好的体验，4K游戏显然无法流畅实现。另外，华硕ZenBook Pro UX501也不够便携，在每个你需要的方面，它的表现都不够理想。Tech Radar表示，华硕ZenBook Pro UX501的配置不错，4K屏幕在查看文件和编辑图片时效果不错。但显然，用户花费1500美元（约合人民币9300元）的高价，...
