uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Games » PC » World of Warcraft: Cataclysm



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of World of Warcraft: Cataclysm

Testseek.co.uk have collected 61 expert reviews of the World of Warcraft: Cataclysm and the average rating is 89%. Scroll down and see all reviews for World of Warcraft: Cataclysm.
Award: Most Awarded December 2010
December 2010
 
(89%)
61 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
89 0 100 61

The editors liked

  • Streamlined
  • Storycentric questing reduces “the grind”
  • Two fantastic new races with starting areas to match
  • Highlevel content that rewards teamwork and skill

The editors didn't like

  • The new PvP zone
  • Tol Barad if you're an attacker
  • Archaeology's rarely fun and frequently timeconsuming
  • The rare quest that don't make use of phasing tech or a clever premise

 

Reviews

page 3 of 7
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2010-12-18, review by: Play.tm

  • Abstract:  Destroying a world loved by 12 million people is quite a risky manoeuvre. One that perhaps only Blizzard would dare risk, knowing that its fans are that trusting of the World of Warcraft brand. A reboot is exactly what's needed from the aging but domin...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2010-12-17, Author: Jaz , review by: techworld.com

  • While I do have some criticisms of World of Warcraft: Cataclysm, there's more than enough to keep me happy, and I'm certainly already hard at it, blasting through levels and exploring the new areas of the game (perhaps a little faster than I expected ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-12-16, Author: Justin , review by: cnet.com

  • Abstract:  Until recently it might have been considered hyperbole to say that World of Warcraft bears little resemblance to the game that it launched as six years ago. But now, following the recent releases of both a major free update and the eagerly anticipated ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
 
  Published: 2010-12-16, review by: gamespot.com

  • New zones with satisfying stories and varied quests are the best to date, Fun and very different starter zones for new races, Guild leveling and rewards systems are great additions, Level and gear restrictions introduced for battlegrounds and dungeons respectively, Masterful use of phasing technology makes your actions feel impactful.
  • New archaeology profession isn't fun, Not enough zones to level a second character without repeating lots of content.
  • Cataclysm doesn't improve World of Warcraft as dramatically as the free update that preceded it did, but it's still a great expansion pack for anyone with high-level characters....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
 
  Published: 2010-12-16, review by: gameplaymonthly.com

  • Abstract:  Blizzard Entertainment has yet to fail me when it comes to World of Warcraft. The vast amount of sweat, blood, and tears that go into their prodigal game has made for six years and two expansion packs worth of addictive content, and after a week into...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(83%)
 
  Published: 2010-12-09, review by: gamepro.com

  • The overall game is much improved in terms of its overall design; Exciting new dungeons and raids to challenge players; PvP fans are taken care of with new battlegrounds and a new rated system; Two new character types and class combinations.
  • Not quite as impressive as previous expansions in terms of new locational content; The overhaul of the fundamental game mechanics have improved some character types, but others feel like they still need work.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-12-07, review by: cheatcc.com

  • Abstract:  I have a confession to make. I'm a total "n00b," as it were, when it comes to World of Warcraft. I just never got around to playing the MMO that's had everyone talking for half a decade. The Cataclysm expansion is going to change all that. I'm going t...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(86%)
 
  Published: 2010-12-06, review by: tomshardware.com

  • If you're a regular Tom's Hardware reader, a performance evaluation like this is par for the course. If you're new here, your head is probably spinning after seeing all of those bar and line charts, along with the talk of scaling, bottlenecks, and code...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-02-14, review by: atomicmpc.com.au

  • As if we needed more proof that Blizzard’s at the top of its game......

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2011-02-14, Author: David , review by: pcauthority.com.au

  • As if we needed more proof that Blizzard's at the top of its game...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(83%)
    page 3 of 7 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×