Testseek.co.uk have collected 41 expert reviews of the Optoma PK-101 Pico Pocket Projector and the average rating is 67%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Optoma PK-101 Pico Pocket Projector.
November 2008
(67%)
41 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
67010041
The editors liked
Amazingly small and pretty with it. Shows dark scenes well. Audio built in and not as horrific as expected. Not a bad price for cutting-edge tech
Amazing design
Unexpectedly cheap
Some surprisingly good picture elements
Decent performance for such a small device
Built-in speakers
Tiny
Speaker
Brighter than the V10 and Mpro110
LED rated at 20 000 hours
Silent
Truly pocket sized
Attractive design
Bright output
Affordable
Good battery life
Compact
Bright display
Portable
Simple to use
Cheap
The editors didn't like
The picture is woefully short of brightness
Especially at larger image sizes. Colours bleed occasionally. Very limited video connectivity
Abstract: This is the smallest projector I have seen; it is smaller than most mobile phones. However from two metres away it can display a bright clear image on any flat wall, in fact I even tried it on a ceiling but that would require you to be lying down on a ...
Abstract: Pocket projectors are the next big thing. At CES, WoWWee unveiled the Cinemin Stick and Swivel model, Samsung the MBP200 and Acer's K10 Pico is the most recent launch, announced earlier this month.However, Optoma gets kudos for being one of the pioneer...
Abstract: The projector I'm reviewing today hasn't got any HDMIs on it. In fact, it only takes composite video. The projector I'm reviewing today isn't HD Ready. In fact, its resolution is a puny 320 x 240. The projector I'm reviewing today can't really deliver pic...
Abstract: Lets put on a show right here! Interesting concept, but nobodys quite nailed it yet. Last month we tested Aipteks Pocket Cinema, a palm sized projector with a built-in media player, but werent impressed with its image quality. We hoped for better...
