uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Home Electronics » Video » TV-boxes » Google Chromecast G1



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Google Chromecast G1

Testseek.co.uk have collected 345 expert reviews of the Google Chromecast G1 and the average rating is 80%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Google Chromecast G1.
Award: Most Awarded August 2013
August 2013
 
(80%)
345 Reviews
Users
(91%)
3732 Reviews
80 0 100 345

The editors liked

  • Strong on price
  • Impressive size
  • Cross platform compatibility
  • Ease and speed of set up
  • Affordable price
  • Easy set up
  • Fast
  • High-quality video streaming
  • I've said it once
  • And I'll say it 100 more
  • But the new wireless antenna is nothing short of astounding. It creates a near seamless streaming environment with less lag and less buffering time than almost anything – even full size set-top boxes – on the m
  • Affordable
  • Very good remote
  • 4K/HDR Support
  • Google's Chromecast is cheap and streams iPlayer
  • Netflix
  • YouTube and Google content to your TV using phones
  • Tablets or computers as remotes. It's easy to setup and use
  • And the video quality is great
  • Great new design
  • Easy to set up
  • Tiny
  • Forget-about-me design
  • Idiot-proof setup and use
  • Strong audio and video quality
  • Compact
  • Simple to set up and use
  • Good picture quality where available
  • Simple
  • All-in-one
  • Likely to get better over time
  • Easy to use
  • Cheap
  • Hidden behind your TV
  • Operate via your phone
  • Innovative
  • Takes up next-to-no space
  • Simple and intuitive
  • Slick operation
  • App support is increasing
  • Works flawlessly
  • It's easy to set up and use
  • Lots of apps
  • It's so cheap!
  • Works with lots of apps
  • Google Home integration
  • Ease of setup
  • Discreet design
  • No need for an extra remote
  • Price
  • Smooth integration with supported apps
  • Useful accessories
  • Supports multiple casts on same network
  • Fairly cheap
  • Fairly easy to use
  • Reliable Netflix streaming

The editors didn't like

  • Compatible apps relatively limited at present
  • Mirroring function limited to relaying Chrome browser content
  • Is yet to maximise its potential
  • Limited to compatible apps
  • On July 24th 2014
  • Google announced Chromecast
  • Its new multimedia-streaming technology. Billed as Google's answer to Apple TV
  • This dongle-sized TV stick in fact aims to offer so much more. Si
  • As a fellow editor pointed out in our early hands on review
  • We're still looking for a native way to stream Amazon Instant Video from a phone or tablet to a Chromecast
  • Or mirror iOS devices to the TV with it. It's not wise to hold your breath for either
  • No wired internet
  • Interface needs work
  • Not enough services are supported yet and screen-mirroring sucks for video. The lack of a dedicated remote also means you always need a smartphone or tablet nearby
  • Plus for £20 less
  • You can get a re-badged Roku box from Now TV that includes iPlayer
  • Search needs improvement
  • More apps needed
  • Few compatible apps
  • Slightly untidy USB power
  • Can't cast local videos on smartphones
  • Tablets
  • Requires companion device
  • Fairly limited in its current form
  • Limited native support currently
  • HDMI limis older TV compatibility
  • Not many supported apps yet
  • Could do with more apps
  • No remote control
  • Still some apps missing
  • No UI or physical remote
  • Poor selection of compatible apps
  • Chrome integration is limited
  • No direct streaming from phones/tablets

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 3 of 35
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2014-07-03, Author: by , review by: geeksquad.co.uk

  • Affordable price, Easy set up, Fast, high-quality video streaming
  • Is yet to maximise its potential, Limited to compatible apps, On July 24th 2014, Google announced Chromecast, its new multimedia-streaming technology. Billed as Google's answer to Apple TV, this dongle-sized TV stick in fact aims to offer so much more. Si

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-06-04, Author: paul_smart , review by: gadgetspeak.com

  • Abstract:  It is 7x3.5x1cm, the middle figure the width is at the fatter back just behind the connection it is only 2cm so should not block any nearby HDMI ports. However if this is a problem on your TV an HDMI extender cable is supplied.It is also supplied with a 1...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(72%)
 
  Published: 2014-05-21, Author: Matt , review by: techmadeeasy.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Keeping it simple, stupidIt took me a while to actually bother buying a Google Chromecast. At £30 it's not exactly expensive, but I honestly struggled thinking what benefit it actually had over my existing setup.After all, I'm in a home where every room h...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(95%)
 
  Published: 2014-05-03, Author: Chris , review by: ergohacks.com

  • The beauty of the Chromecast is in its simplicity and low cost.  It does not attempt to provide you with a front end or complicated abilities but leaves that to your device.  This means that if you can use the controlling device you can use the Chromecast...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-04-29, Author: David , review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Buying a new smart TV is expensive business, and to be quite honest, it's probably not a great idea, as once you have spent hundreds/thousands of pounds on a new TV then you are locked in to its onboard hardware for the TV's lifetime – which may well be o...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-04-11, Author: Jim , review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • A brilliant, low-cost add-on for Android device users in particular, providing a blissfully simple way to beam video from your device to the big screen. People who want to stream their own media collection should look elsewhere. The Chromecast is cheap an...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2014-04-08, Author: Jason , review by: CNET.co.uk

  • Google's Chromecast is cheap and streams iPlayer, Netflix, YouTube and Google content to your TV using phones, tablets or computers as remotes. It's easy to setup and use, and the video quality is great
  • Not enough services are supported yet and screen-mirroring sucks for video. The lack of a dedicated remote also means you always need a smartphone or tablet nearby, plus for £20 less, you can get a re-badged Roku box from Now TV that includes iPlayer
  • Technically, the Chromecast is a wonder to behold. If all you want is a cheap way to get iPlayer and Netflix, it's a good choice, but it needs more content before it becomes a must-buy for most....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2014-04-02, Author: Katie , review by: wired.co.uk

  • Ease of setup, discreet design, no need for an extra remote, price
  • Poor selection of compatible apps
  • The Chromecast is a very promising device, but it doesn't quite tick all our boxes at the moment. If all you need is a cheap way to watch Netflix on your TV, this is undoubtedly the device for you, but those who require anything more will likely be disap...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2014-03-24, Author: David , review by: artiss.co.uk

  • Easy to use, Cheap, Hidden behind your TV, Operate via your phone
  • Not many supported apps yet
  • At just £30 it's worth taking a risk with it, even though it's new to the market. It's easier to add apps to the market than, say, NowTV so in time we should hopefully see a lot more content becoming available. It's a simple idea but powerful and I'm real...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2014-03-21, Author: Bob , review by: theregister.co.uk

  • Overall, the Chromecast is very much a get-what-you-pay-for device. In use, it appears particularly sensitive to signal strength and even moving around a room can affect its performance. YouTube was the most resilient playback channel and for best result...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 3 of 35 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 35   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×