uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Home Electronics » Wearables » Apple Watch 4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Apple Watch 4

Testseek.co.uk have collected 939 expert reviews of the Apple Watch 4 and the average rating is 81%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Apple Watch 4.
Award: Most Awarded May 2019
May 2019
 
(81%)
939 Reviews
Users
(96%)
195 Reviews
81 0 100 939

The editors liked

  • Water- and swim-proof
  • Built-in GPS
  • Brighter
  • More readable screen outdoors
  • Bigger screen
  • Louder speaker
  • Still lets you use old straps
  • Bigger and more immersive screen
  • Same strap size
  • Series 2
  • GPS
  • Waterproof
  • Ceramic design
  • Dualcore processor
  • Sapphire glass and brighter display | Series 1
  • Faster than original (dualcore processor) | Original
  • Cheapest (used)
  • Gorgeous design
  • Smooth performance and navigation
  • Great screen
  • The overall look and feel of the Apple Watch
  • As with most products from Cupertino
  • Was a major plus for me. The last thing you want is a watch that you have to apologize for visually just so you can find out when Ebay is asking you to bid from your wrist
  • It's a lovely thing to wear
  • And it's already proven itself useful in dozens of tiny but welcome ways. I suspect it will grow on me further as it settles and matures – and as I learn where its strengths are versus where I should instead use my iPhone or M
  • Impressive hardware specifications
  • Well priced
  • Great features
  • Simple and elegant menu system
  • Stylish design
  • Clever interface
  • Two sizes
  • Beautifully constructed. Handles messages well. A solid fitness tracker. Hundreds of apps. Can send and receive voice calls via an iPhone. Lots of design choices. Apple Pay-enabled. Stores music for local playback over Bluetooth
  •  Innovative
  •  Heavily customisable
  • Great design
  • Lovely screen
  • Accurate voice recogntion
  • Glances
  • Stylish
  • Battery life
  • Reply to text messages
  • Photo watch faces
  • Apple Pay
  • Multiple variants to appeal to many people
  • Well designed UI
  • Comfortable to wear
  • Attractive
  • Comfortable
  • Classy and easy to remove straps
  • Taptic Engine vibrations and taps
  • Faster than original
  • More affordable than Series 2
  • Same storage space
  • Speed
  • And basic functions of Apple Watch Series 2
  • But for less money. WatchOS 3 is much-improved software over last year
  • The Apple Watch Series 4 offers a larger
  • Crisp display that shows more with less bezel
  • Superfast speed and a louder speaker. It adds high and low heart-rate detection
  • Fall detection with SOS trigger
  • And (eventually) FDA-cleared EKG for more detailed h
  • Big screen and slim body
  • Runs fast and smooth
  • New health & safety features
  • Improved audio and call quality
  • Strong display
  • Lovely back
  • Clever new health features
  • Larger display
  • Lightweight design
  • Better design
  • Lifesaving metrics
  • Top sports features
  • Feels great to wear
  • Screen is gorgeous
  • Huge amount of strap options
  • Fantastic array of fitness and health features
  • It motivates you so well to be active
  • A really lovely
  • Classy device - more so than any rival
  • Already a number of very useful and clever apps and deluge hasn't even begun
  • Enhances your gadget life in subtle but significant ways
  • Larger screen
  • Thinner
  • Excellent performance
  • Big
  • Bright screen
  • Good battery life
  • Impressive health features
  • Better fit in thinner body
  • Best-looking smartwatch so far
  • Force Touch well integrated
  • Digital Crown is a useful addition
  • Design
  • 'haptic' interface
  • Siri performs well
  • Unique communication methods make it special
  • Attractive design in multiple sizes
  • Notification taps are subtle
  • Setup is a breeze
  • Watch OS 2.0 fixes some app problems
  • Notification support means you can glance and carry on with your day
  • Speed improved by watchOS 3
  • Slimmer chassis
  • Lightweight
  • The watch can be used to make calls
  • Send messages
  • Listen to music and use Siri even if you don't have your iPhone to hand it's also available without this functionality for £399
  • It comes in two screen sizes 40mm or 44mm
  • The watch's speaker is louder t
  • Listen to music and use Siri even if you don't have your iPhone to hand - it's also available without this functionality for £399
  • It comes in two screen sizes - 40mm or 44mm
  • The watch's speaker is loud

The editors didn't like

  • The price is high
  • Still no sleep tracking
  • Electrocardiogram feature not available at launch
  • Series 2
  • Expensive | Series 1
  • IonX glass | Original
  • Can only be bought used
  • The price
  • Software will take a while to get used to
  • The Apple Watch feels exactly like you'd expect it to
  • A first attempt. Apple's fused its own design ethos with the limited technology around at the moment to make a compelling smartwatch – but it's still a smartwatch
  • A device that doesn't really have an
  • The battery has easily been good enough in my 42mm (which has a slightly bigger battery than 38mm models) to last a long day without having to step down into the ‘it only functions as a watch' Power Reserve mode
  • But it's still a pain to take it off night
  • No universal search
  • Expensive at any level
  • Battery life is one day
  • Missing many key apps
  • Battery only lasts a little more than a day. Most models and configurations cost more than they should. Requires an iPhone to work. Interface can be confusing. Many apps load slowly. Lacks built-in GPS
  • Expensive
  •  Mediocre battery
  •  Not essential
  • Hard to learn interface
  • Limited useful apps
  • Apps are slow to load when not native
  • No GPS
  • No third-party watch faces
  • Doesn't offer huge amounts over what is on the market
  • Priced a lot higher than some will be prepared to pay
  • Interface feels slightly sluggish
  • Interface can be counterintuitive at first and occasionally feels sluggish
  • Very expensive
  • No support for native apps (yet)
  • Somewhat fussy interface
  • Sluggish apps
  • Lacks GPS and waterproofing
  • No stainless steel option
  • Lacks swim-ready water resistance and onboard GPS found in Series 2 models. Only comes in aluminum models
  • Starting prices are higher than last year. Battery life still won't last past two days. Watch face options are still very limited in choice and function. Only works with iPhones
  • Reduced battery life
  • High price tag
  • No upgrades on fitness really
  • ECG capability limited to US later
  • Still on the pricey side
  • Battery life needs to be more than two days
  • More expensive
  • Battery life still short
  • Siri integration still not great
  • It won't last multiple days without needing a charge
  • Still won't track sleep natively
  • No always-on display is irritating
  • A day of battery isn't ideal and precludes sleep tracking
  • Not as instantly intuitive as other Apple devices
  • No ECG test in UK
  • Running data still behind Garmin
  • New flush side button is harder to press
  • Unintuitive and buggy software
  • Significantly drains iPhone battery
  • Third-party apps need work
  • Some gimmicky features
  • Lacklustre launch apps
  • Time checking is problematic
  • Third-party apps crash
  • Software has a learning curve
  • One-day battery life
  • Interface can be counterintuitive at first
  • Occasionally feels sluggish
  • Thirdparty apps run relatively slowly
  • Lack of GPS
  • Pricey
  • Battery life still only 2 days
  • Won't track sleep natively
  • No always-on display option
  • It's slow to boot up
  • You have to be on EE or Vodafone to use the Apple Watch without an iPhone to hand

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 8 of 94
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2015-04-30, Author: Christopher , review by: gizmodo.co.uk

  • It's a lovely thing to wear, and it's already proven itself useful in dozens of tiny but welcome ways. I suspect it will grow on me further as it settles and matures – and as I learn where its strengths are versus where I should instead use my iPhone or M
  • The battery has easily been good enough in my 42mm (which has a slightly bigger battery than 38mm models) to last a long day without having to step down into the ‘it only functions as a watch' Power Reserve mode, but it's still a pain to take it off night
  • This can be an easy decision. If you fall in the Venn diagram intersection of ‘owner of an iPhone 5 or later', ‘sufficient disposable income that at least three-hundred quid won't mean fundamental sacrifices', and ‘enthusiastic and curious about technolog...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-04-27, Author: Adam , review by: theregister.co.uk

  • To me, this feels like a 0.9 product, but a promising one. Apple has answered the critics who doubted a computer company could make a wearable that people wanted to wear: the hardware is objectively gorgeous and, having stopped using a watch ten years ago...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-04-24, review by: Digitaltrends.com

  • Unique communication methods make it special, Attractive design in multiple sizes, Notification taps are subtle, Setup is a breeze, Watch OS 2.0 fixes some app problems
  • Third-party apps crash, Software has a learning curve, One-day battery life
  • Right now, it's difficult to say whether the Apple Watch is going to break into the mainstream. It's also too early to say whether our initial warmth toward it is because it's new and fun. Only more time spent with it will tell if the sheen will wear off...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-04-24, Author: Matt , review by: macworld.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Here at Macworld we are committed iPhone users, and we are very excited about the launch of the Apple Watch. But as is so often the case with Apple products, Apple is not the first to make a smartwatch. Far from it. Indeed, Android Wear devices no prolife...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-04-10, Author: Karen , review by: macworld.co.uk

  • Gorgeous design, Multiple variants to appeal to many people, Well designed UI
  • Priced a lot higher than some will be prepared to pay, Interface feels slightly sluggish
  • The Apple Watch isn't the first ever smartwatch, and it doesn't really do anything other smartwatches don't do. But what it does do, we hope it will do better than the competition, thanks to Apple's user interface expertise. However, our main criticism of...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-04-10, Author: Jack , review by: gizmodo.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Now that the Apple Watch has gone up for pre-order in the UK, have a read through our recent meta-review to see what everyone is saying about Cupertino's smartwatch...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-04-09, review by: knowyourmobile.com

  • Abstract:  The early reviews are good –– very good –– with virtually every reviewer saying the Apple Watch is the best smartwatch anyone has ever made. Yet, while the device does mostly receive high praise, some question whether it actually fills any kind of need for most consumers. We’ll have a full review of the Apple Watch coming up in the next few weeks, until then here’s what others are saying...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-04-08, Author: Matt , review by: macworld.co.uk

  • Abstract:  For the iPhone user, the Apple Watch is the obvious choice of smartwatch. But it isn't the only choice - or at least it won't be, once Android Wear watches are at least partially compatible with iOS devices. So we decided to compare the LG Watch Urbane wi...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-04-08, review by: CNET.co.uk

  • Beautifully constructed. Handles messages well. A solid fitness tracker. Hundreds of apps. Can send and receive voice calls via an iPhone. Lots of design choices. Apple Pay-enabled. Stores music for local playback over Bluetooth
  • Battery only lasts a little more than a day. Most models and configurations cost more than they should. Requires an iPhone to work. Interface can be confusing. Many apps load slowly. Lacks built-in GPS
  • The Apple Watch is the most ambitious, well-constructed smartwatch ever seen, but first-gen shortfalls make it feel more like a fashionable toy than a necessary tool....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2015-04-08, Author: Matt , review by: gizmodo.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Yes, the verdicts are starting to come in for Apple's first smartwatch. Well, the verdicts from predominantly US journalists who have clearly been given a fair amount of time with their Apple Watches if Mashable's 10-chapter review and the 32-strong cast/...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 8 of 94 « Previous   1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 94   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×