Testseek.co.uk have collected 22 expert reviews of the Philips AirFryer HD9220 and the average rating is 76%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Philips AirFryer HD9220.
(76%)
22 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(90%)
1866 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
76010022
The editors liked
Cooks great chips really quickly
Easy to clean
The Philips Airfryer uses a heating element and a fan
Both of which sit above a tray for your food. It offers temperatures of up to 200 degrees
And can cook chips in around 15 minutes – around 10 minutes quicker than an oven. One of the best bits about the Philips Airfryer is the fact that it doesn't use much oil – around a table spoon in fact. That also makes a difference when it comes to tast
Small
Tasty chips
Built-in timer
The editors didn't like
Expensive
Limited in what you will eventually find yourself cooking
Large for a kitchen worktop
On the downside
The Philips Airfryer doesn't produce chips that are up there with the very best. It may be a slightly healthier option
But for taste you simply can't beat a conventional fryer. The Philips Airfryer also takes up a lot of space.
Abstract: Philips claims its latest chip fryer can serve up delicious sliced spuds using 80 percent less fat. That's all well and good, of course, but do you want to eat the results? We find out for you: click play on the clip above to see what we made of it....
Abstract: Unlike the Tefal Actifry that is almost totally for ‘potato type products’ this can work with a whole range of products including meats and fish, perhaps the only restriction is that they should be large enough not to fall through the grid....
The Philips Airfryer uses a heating element and a fan, both of which sit above a tray for your food. It offers temperatures of up to 200 degrees, and can cook chips in around 15 minutes – around 10 minutes quicker than an oven. One of the best bits about the Philips Airfryer is the fact that it doesn't use much oil – around a table spoon in fact. That also makes a difference when it comes to tast
On the downside, the Philips Airfryer doesn't produce chips that are up there with the very best. It may be a slightly healthier option, but for taste you simply can't beat a conventional fryer. The Philips Airfryer also takes up a lot of space.
A decent enough option if you're looking to cook food in slightly less time than an oven, the Philips Airfryer is also capable of producing food that's slightly healthier than fried rivals. It's not perfect, however, with food proving a bit dryer than ...
Compact, Easy to use and clean, Package includes nice recipe book.
Very expensive, Low cooking capacity
The appliance doesn't feature a Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE) label, and utilizes 1425 Watts of power. Considering that a standard induction cooker requires 2000 W of power and an oven requires 1200 W, this is quite acceptable. Note that you must use...
Abstract: When I took an Instagram picture of my Philips Air Fryer about 2 weeks ago, I got a whole lot of comments and replies. I actually bought and have been using the Air Fryer for a long time already. I bought it the day it arrived in Malaysian shores.If you d...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2013-07-01, Author: Art , review by: technoodling.net
Abstract: First off, I ain't no chef. I do survival cooking — whatever a guy needs to do to have a decent enough meal without having to overdo it. Sometimes I'd want to treat myself to a meal with aesthetically nice “plating,” but more often than not I just want to...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2020-04-03, Author: Sven , review by: Chip.de
Abstract: Im Test der Stiftung Warentest mussten mit Heißluftfritteusen Hähnchen, Muffins, Gemüse und natürlich Pommes zubereitet werden. Leider gab es kein Gerät, dass jedes der Gerichte sehr gut zubereitet. Zumindest sind aber vier Geräte bei der Zubereitung gute...
