uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Samsung GT-I9100 Galaxy S2



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung GT-I9100 Galaxy S2

Testseek.co.uk have collected 637 expert reviews of the Samsung GT-I9100 Galaxy S2 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung GT-I9100 Galaxy S2.
Award: Highest Rated April 2011
April 2011
 
(88%)
637 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
88 0 100 637

The editors liked

  • Faster performance
  • Bigger screen and better colour depth than the original Samsung Galaxy plus more internal storage
  • Upgradable to Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
  • Slim and sleek design
  • Light as a feather
  • Fast internet
  • Great text input
  • Clear screen
  • Reasonable battery life
  • Light
  • Slim
  • Big screen
  • Dynamic
  • Colourful video
  • New Kies wireless software is neat
  • Beautiful 4.3-inch screen
  • Insanely slim and light
  • Very fast
  • Great camera
  • Attractive design
  • Endless features and customisation options
  • Hugely powerful
  • TouchWiz 4 doesn't spoil the Android experience
  • Lightweight
  • Fantastic display
  • Gorgeous slice of Super AMOLED
  • Stunningly fast
  • Super-fast reaction times
  • Slim design
  • Ridiculously clear screen
  • Clear call quality
  • 1080p video recording
  • The phone is super speedy thanks to that dualcore processor
  • Stunning combination of topnotch features
  • Dazzling screen but still very usable/Great camera
  • Generally respsonive with very smooth navigation
  • Fullyfeatured media player/Amazing mobile web experience
  • TouchWiz 4 interface adds a lot to Android 2.3
  • Thin
  • Light and powerful / Kies Air app
  • The Samsung Galaxy S II features one of the best screens available on a smartphone. At 4.2 inches
  • It's large enough to consume media content with ease
  • And it's also pin-sharp. Samsung has used AMOLED technology to produce stunning colour reproduction
  • With vivid hues and deep blacks on offer. The Galaxy S II is also the fastest smartphone we've had the pleasure of using
  • With the Gingerbread ve
  • Fast
  • Slim and lightweight
  • Great screen
  • Good camera
  • MicroSD card support
  • 1.2GHz dualcore processor
  • 4.3in. Super AMOLED Plus screen
  • 8megapixel main camera
  • 2megapixel front camera
  • Good range of apps
  • Fair battery life
  • Incredibly fast
  • Dazzling 4.3in screen
  • Excellent video playback
  • Web browser supports Flash
  • Light for its size
  • Fast and smooth UI
  • Audio quality
  • Brilliant 4.3inch display
  • Still photo quality and 1080p video quality
  • Battery life
  • Sleek and attractive design

The editors didn't like

  • Slightly reduced battery life (improved with firmware updates)
  • Plastic shell (but this does make the phone very light for its size)
  • Design
  • The Samsung Galaxy S II is very thin
  • With a light plastic shell that weighs just 116g. It's lighter than the iPh
  • Expensive
  • Fragile back cover
  • Lacks premium feel
  • Audio can be bettered
  • No longer the latest Android OS
  • Filled with app bloatware
  • Menus are confused in places
  • Not as user-friendly as HTC and iPhone rivals
  • Not much unless you are really picky
  • Succeeds in spite of Samsung's software hubs
  • Not because of
  • Flimsy back cover
  • Poor keyboard layout
  • Samsung Apps portal
  • Keen photographers will miss a dedicated shutter key
  • Plasticky build
  • Flimsy backplate.
  • Screen not very bright and doesn't reproduce colours accurately
  • MHL convertor for HDMI ports not included
  • Still entirely plastic
  • Yet another iPhone clone
  • TouchWiz not for everybody
  • There's very little to dislike about the Samsung Galaxy S II. The huge screen and skinny casing can make it slightly awkward to hold
  • And the Android OS gets some slightly useless additions from Samsung
  • But both of these points are minor niggles.
  • Unnecessary software
  • Plastic chassis
  • Flimsy backplate
  • Screen may be too large for those with small hands
  • Screen resolution could be higher
  • MicroSD card slot is under the battery
  • Too large for some
  • Plastic build doesn't feel premium
  • Poor call quality

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 14 of 64
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-08-28, review by: electronista.com

  • Very fast processor and 3G/4G data, Excellent, huge Super AMOLED Plus display, Very thin but still has ample builtin and microSD storage, TouchWiz generally helps, Good cameras for photos and 1080p videos, Unusually good battery life, Topflight call quality, DLNA media sharing and Kies Air/WiFi sync,
  • Some TouchWiz, Samsung apps flawed, At times a touch too iPhonelike for Android diehards, May be too big for smaller hands, Question of longterm OS update support,
  • The beauty and danger of Android's flexibility is that it's possible to either get the hardware or software very right or very wrong. We've seen more than a few devices this year that were either flawed genius or, in extremes, were ruined by poor custo...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2011-08-04, review by: hothardware.com

  • 1.2 GHz dual-core processor, 1GB RAM, 4.3 inch Super AMOLED Plus display, Thinner and lighter than rivals, TouchWiz 4.0 overlay is genuinely useful
  • Expensive, No qHD resolution, No microSD card included
  • Put simply, the Galaxy S II is possibly the best Android phone we've laid our hands on to date. Of course, the qualifier to that statement is that new Android phones are hitting the market on what seems like a weekly basis, so the champ today may not be t...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-07-27, Author: Elmer , review by: androidauthority.com

  • Abstract:  Probably one of the chief reasons that the major mobile carriers in the United States have been mum about the Samsung Galaxy S II's arrival on American shores is that the blockbuster Samsung smartphone is not arriving at all as the black slab of beauty an...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-07-18, Author: Kellex , review by: droid-life.com

  • Abstract:  With the dual-core chipsets from Texas Instruments (OMAP), NVIDIA (Tegra) and Samsung (Exynos) all making their way into devices and our hands in the last couple of months, we wanted to see how each compared to each other in a series of Android benchmarks...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-07-15, review by: zomgitscj.com

  • It’s hard to find fault with the Samsung Galaxy S II. Really. Sure you can point out the (Notoriously Samsung) plastic build quality, but the screen is gorgeous, the hardware is ridiculously powerful with plenty of horsepower, and it seems to succeed ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2011-07-15, Author: Glenn , review by: androidauthority.com

  • So, that's pretty much my experience with this phone. The Samsung Galaxy S2 is the best phone I've had in a while and 3 million folks out there will likely agree with me. The only thing missing for me is a dock ala Atrix to turn it into a full-fledged c...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-07-11, review by: androidpolice.com

  • Samsung clearly aimed high with the Galaxy S II. In fact, you could say they aimed for the sta- no, I hate puns. The phone's performance was stell- ah, damn it. Whether you like puns or not, the Galaxy S II is a device that has exceedingly high perform...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-07-08, Author: Kellex , review by: droid-life.com

  • It's the best phone I've used to date – I'm talking ever, and I go through a lot of phones. Since opening the pretty black package and firing it up for the first time almost 3 weeks ago now, I haven't been able to put it down. I'm constantly finding rea...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-07-01, review by: Theinquirer.net

  • Thin, light, huge screen, good battery life, lag-free, camera
  • Not as fast a web browsing as the HTC Sensation

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-06-30, Author: Darcy , review by: androidauthority.com

  • The Samsung Galaxy S II raises the bar significantly with its long list of technological treats that will certainly enamor many consumers for a long time to come. Some will expectedly turn away from it because of its battery power limitations, but this...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 14 of 64 « Previous   1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 64   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×