uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Samsung GT-S7275 Galaxy Ace 3



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung GT-S7275 Galaxy Ace 3

Testseek.co.uk have collected 84 expert reviews of the Samsung GT-S7275 Galaxy Ace 3 and the average rating is 71%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung GT-S7275 Galaxy Ace 3.
Award: Good Buy December 2013
December 2013
 
(71%)
84 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
71 0 100 84

The editors liked

  • A 4G phone for under £300
  • Impressive range of features
  • Including NFC
  • Screen is surprisingly good despite seemingly low specs
  • 4G connectivity
  • Expandable storage
  • Samsung stylings
  • Good general build quality
  • Relatively smooth
  • Fluid interface
  • Very good audio player
  • 4G / NFC connectivity
  • Easy to use
  • Bright screen
  • 4G enabled
  • Bright Screen
  • Decent Battery
  • Intuitive UI
  • 4G
  • Useful Easy Mode
  • 4G support
  • NFC on board
  • Supports 4G
  • MicroSD card support
  • Clean user interface
  • Premium design for a budget phone
  • Simple
  • Easy to use UI
  • Decent battery life
  • Expandable memory
  • Decent camera

The editors didn't like

  • Not really a 'budget' handset anymore
  • Customers may still associate the Ace line with lower-spec phones
  • Feels a little cheap
  • Especially when you take the back cover off
  • Screen and specs fall short of much cheaper Moto G
  • Limited on-board storage
  • Bundled Samsung software could be confusing for new users
  • A bit heavy for its size
  • Videos/photos aren't amazing quality
  • Battery life could be better
  • Unremarkable appearance
  • Unremarkable performance
  • A little heavy
  • Awkward keyboard
  • Disappointing Camera
  • Not HD
  • Low resolution screen
  • Disappointing battery life
  • Short on internal memory
  • Slightly sluggish performance
  • Average camera
  • Dated design
  • Trumped by cheaper Moto G
  • Too many apps
  • Bright screen
  • Specs don't compete with cheaper rivals

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 9
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2015-02-10, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 brings good performance and excellent battery life to buyers on a budget. Its screen resolution may not be fantastic and some of its software additions are fairly superfluous, but now the price has come down, it's a much better va...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2014-04-04, Author: Jonathan , review by: alphr.com

  • Samsung's pocket rocket delivers plenty of power and a bucket-load of features, including 4G support and NFC, at a temptingly low price...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(83%)
 
  Published: 2014-03-06, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Good general build quality, Relatively smooth, fluid interface, Very good audio player, 4G / NFC connectivity
  • A bit heavy for its size, Videos/photos aren't amazing quality, Battery life could be better

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2014-02-07, Author: Kevin , review by: 3g.co.uk

  • Easy to use, Bright screen, 4G enabled
  • Unremarkable appearance, Unremarkable performance
  • The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 doesn't really do anything wrong but other than the inclusion of 4G it doesn't do anything that well either. Its performance, screen, battery life and camera all get the job done, but only just. The whole phone can be summed up by...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2014-02-06, Author: Michael , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Supports 4G, MicroSD card support, Clean user interface
  • Slightly sluggish performance, Average camera, Dated design
  • The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 is a cheap 4G phone, but it's that's no match for the new king of the cheap smartphone, the Motorola Moto G.Next, read our round-up of the best cheap mobile phones...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2014-01-17, Author: Jamie , review by: whatmobile.net

  • Premium design for a budget phone, Simple, easy to use UI, Decent battery life
  • Trumped by cheaper Moto G, Too many apps, Bright screen

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(62%)
 
  Published: 2014-01-08, Author: Dave , review by: wired.co.uk

  • 4G connectivity, expandable memory, decent camera
  • Specs don't compete with cheaper rivals
  • The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 is a pretty decent midrange phone, with an okay screen, reasonably fast processor and better than average camera. But the game has changed with the Google-backed Motorola Moto G, and the midrange has shifted up in spec and down ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2013-12-23, review by: itproportal.com

  • Useful Easy Mode, 4G support, NFC on board
  • Low resolution screen, Disappointing battery life, Short on internal memory
  • It is quite difficult to recommend the Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 – but that's not because of any really poor intrinsic failings. Yes, I'd have liked a better screen and better battery life, but when stacked up alongside 4G and NFC these are compromises you ha...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2013-12-18, Author: Thomas , review by: techradar.com

  • Bright Screen, Decent Battery, Intuitive UI, 4G
  • A little heavy, Awkward keyboard, Disappointing Camera, Not HD
  • The Galaxy Ace range has traditionally been a lower-powered and lower-priced, and this has continued with the Galaxy Ace 3. There are obviously going to be some trade-offs for the lower price, such as a smaller processor, smaller and lower-res screen, an...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2013-11-20, Author: Andrew , review by: CNET.co.uk

  • 4G connectivity; Expandable storage; Samsung stylings
  • Screen and specs fall short of much cheaper Moto G; Limited on-board storage; Bundled Samsung software could be confusing for new users
  • The Galaxy Ace 3 has an adequate set of specs for the price, but neither its screen, software or performance match the Motorola Moto G's, which costs half as much. Unlike the Moto G though, the Ace 3 does offer 4G and expandable storage -- the only reason...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
    page 1 of 9 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 9   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×