uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Samsung SM-A500 Galaxy A5



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung SM-A500 Galaxy A5

Testseek.co.uk have collected 418 expert reviews of the Samsung SM-A500 Galaxy A5 and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung SM-A500 Galaxy A5.
Award: Recommended January 2015
January 2015
 
(79%)
418 Reviews
Users
(80%)
157 Reviews
79 0 100 418

The editors liked

  • Neat design
  • More powerful screen
  • Flagship-like quality on a budget
  • Lengthy battery life
  • Versatile camera
  • Classy design
  • Water-resistant
  • Bright
  • Vivid screen
  • Premium build quality
  • Excellent Super AMOLED screen
  • TouchWiz is much improved
  • Overall screen quality / excellent responsiveness
  • Slimline and welldesigned
  • Generally responsive
  • Quality and varied usage of the front camera
  • Under £300
  • Beautiful build quality
  • Expandable storage
  • 4G connectivity
  • Very attractive
  • Excellent build quality
  • Gorgeous screen
  • Delightful design (prefer it to SGS5)
  • Bright and colourful display
  • Fair price makes more sense than original Galaxy Alpha
  • Powerful enough to cater for most
  • Great design and build
  • AMOLED display for rich visuals
  • Always On display
  • Stylish and slim design
  • Quality HD screen
  • Decent quadcore processor
  • 13megapixel camera with 5megapixel camera on front
  • Expandable memory

The editors didn't like

  • Still feels slightly odd
  • Could be more expensive than better specced models
  • Middling performance
  • Old
  • Ugly software
  • Not on Android Nougat (yet)
  • Non-removable battery may put some people off
  • A little pricey
  • Only supports SD cards up to 64GB
  • But at least it supports them
  • Screen resolution
  • Quality of graphics was distinctly average during games
  • Battery life could have been better
  • 13 Megapixel back camera is average
  • Android 4.4 KitKat and not Lollipop (5.0)
  • Runs Android KitKat
  • Small battery
  • Still has old TouchWiz
  • Underpowered Processor
  • Shaky camera output in lowlight conditions
  • Performance lags slightly behind rivals
  • Speaker is easy to accidentally muffle
  • Outspecced by Sony Z3 Compact
  • Not Android Lollipop (which we think will smooth out OS slickness)
  • Would like a more significant battery
  • Low-light camera ability
  • Camera could be better
  • Last year's software
  • Not cheap

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 2 of 42
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2015-02-27, Author: Dave , review by: wired.co.uk

  • Stylish and slim design, quality HD screen, decent quadcore processor, 13megapixel camera with 5megapixel camera on front, expandable memory
  • Not cheap
  • For around a £100 more than the A3, the Galaxy A5 has a bigger, better quality screen a superior camera, and the processor has been beefed up a little to cope with the greater demands placed on it. It's a sleek-looking device and a pretty good performer ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-02-26, Author: Romain , review by: digitalversus.com

  • Overall screen quality / excellent responsiveness, Slimline and welldesigned, Generally responsive, Quality and varied usage of the front camera
  • Screen resolution, Quality of graphics was distinctly average during games, Battery life could have been better, 13 Megapixel back camera is average, Android 4.4 KitKat and not Lollipop (5.0)
  • What's happened, Samsung? The brand's rushed and rather desperate attempt to claw back its monopoly of the mobile market by clumsily producing a series of duplicates has spawned a Galaxy A—a series which has struggled to garner interest, while its competi...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2015-02-15, Author: by , review by: geeksquad.co.uk

  • Premium build quality, Excellent Super AMOLED screen, TouchWiz is much improved
  • Non-removable battery may put some people off, A little pricey, Only supports SD cards up to 64GB, but at least it supports them
  • It's not unfair to say that Samsung's phones have looked a bit uninspiring of late. Whilst the phones always performed well you wouldn't look at a Samsung phone and think “Wow, I really like the look of that!” They'd settled into the role of the dull, saf...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-01-15, Author: Gareth , review by: techradar.com

  • Neat design, More powerful screen
  • Still feels slightly odd, Could be more expensive than better specced models
  • Samsung's a good brand for trying things out. After the mixed reviews to the Galaxy S5 it needed something big, as the Galaxy Alpha and Note 4 both accelerated the design story while keeping up with the high-power internals. But that doesn't mean the Sout...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-01-12, Author: Stuart , review by: pocket-lint.com

  • Abstract:  The Samsung A series, first announced late 2014, has made an appearance at CES in Las Vegas before its UK debut and we were on hand to have a play. Cased in metal, this is a new direction for Samsung and most likely the response to the negativity that su...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-01-08, Author: Luke , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Classy design, Water-resistant, Bright, vivid screen
  • Old, ugly software, Not on Android Nougat (yet)
  • The Samsung Galaxy A5 has left me pleasantly surprised. Whereas Samsung's mid-range and low-end phones might have left us frustrated and feeling let down in the past, the A5 is a capable across-the-board performer. Yes, there are still shortfalls and com...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2014-11-06, review by: mobilephones.com

  • Abstract:  The Samsung Galaxy A5 is touted as having a trendy design but I think it is more fitting to say that the design is offered in a range of colours that will appeal to young users both in and out of a professional setting.The colour options include Pearl Whi...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(88%)
 
  Published: 2017-05-31, Author: Jason , review by: techaeris.com

  • Premium looking design, Great photo quality, Crisp, clear screen, microSD card slot, Secure Folder, Plenty of camera options, A lot of OS customization options
  • Runs Android 6.0.1, Too many uninstallable pre-installed apps
  • If you're looking for a mid-range smartphone with a decent camera and premium looking design, the Samsung Galaxy A5 is definitely worth considering.*We were sent a demo unit of the Samsung Galaxy A5 for the purposes of this review.Samsung Galaxy A5$450 CA...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(91%)
 
  Published: 2015-03-31, Author: Rafael , review by: hardwaresecrets.com

  • Big screen (but not too big), with crisp and vivid images, Great design, Slim, compact, and light, Excellent performance, Good main camera, Great frontal camera for “selfies” Memory card slot, Supports two NanoSIM cards (in the model we analyzed), Suppor
  • Could cost less, You can not use a second SIM card and a memory card at the same time

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-03-31, Author: Rafael , review by: hardwaresecrets.com

  • Big screen (but not too big), with crisp and vivid images, Great design, Slim, compact, and light, Excellent performance, Good main camera, Great frontal camera for “selfies”, Memory card slot, Supports two Nano-SIM cards (in the model we analyzed), Suppo
  • Could cost less, You can not use a second SIM card and a memory card at the same time, Shop Related Products, Ads by Amazon, ✕, Thank you, This will help us improve your ad experience. We will try not to show you such ads again, Report a problem, This it
  • The Samsung Galaxy A5 is a great mid-range smartphone with an excellent slim design and good cameras. Altough its cost/benefit ratio is not as good as the ASUS ZenFone 5's, it delivers a better and more compact design, and better cameras...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
    page 2 of 42 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 42   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×