uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Samsung SM-J330 Galaxy J3 2017



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung SM-J330 Galaxy J3 2017

Testseek.co.uk have collected 69 expert reviews of the Samsung SM-J330 Galaxy J3 2017 and the average rating is 70%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung SM-J330 Galaxy J3 2017.
Award: Recommended August 2017
August 2017
 
(70%)
69 Reviews
Users
(82%)
359 Reviews
70 0 100 69

The editors liked

  • Samsung's Galaxy J3 for 2017 has a low price
  • A removable battery and 256GB external storage
  • Attractive design
  • Removable battery
  • Affordable
  • Metal build
  • Solid specs all-round
  • Low price

The editors didn't like

  • The J3 lags hard with less RAM than last year's model. Cameras are low-resolution compared to budget rivals
  • Low storage
  • Lacklustre processor
  • Better options out there for the same money
  • Small battery
  • LCD screen
  • Not overly powerful

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 7
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2019-11-27, review by: knowyourmobile.com

  • Attractive design, removable battery, affordable
  • Low storage, Lacklustre processor, Better options out there for the same money

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2017-11-16, Author: James , review by: 3g.co.uk

  • Metal build, Solid specs all-round, Low price
  • Small battery, LCD screen, Not overly powerful
  • “The Samsung Galaxy J3 (2017) has solid or better specs in almost every area, but competition is steep and some rivals offer more.”Best Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 dealsSamsung Galaxy J3 2017 12GB for the price of 4GB.12GB data Unlimited minsUnlimited texts Ad...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2017-07-20, Author: Jessica , review by: CNET.co.uk

  • Samsung's Galaxy J3 for 2017 has a low price, a removable battery and 256GB external storage
  • The J3 lags hard with less RAM than last year's model. Cameras are low-resolution compared to budget rivals
  • This year's Galaxy J3 is a lukewarm rehash of last year's great budget phone. Go for the Moto E4 instead...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-07-17, review by: mobilephones.com

  • Abstract:  Build QualityPhone Set UpFeaturesCamera & VideoBattery LifeIn our Samsung Galaxy J3 (2017) review we find that even a budget phone has plenty to offer. The Galaxy J3 (2017) is the smallest and cheapest of the 2017 Galaxy J series but if you want a little...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(78%)
 
  Published: 2017-08-07, Author: Florian , review by: notebookcheck.net

  • solid, stylish casing, NFC, USB OTG, very accurate GPS module, cameras' decent photo quality, extensive control options, bright screen with outdoor mode, low temperatures, very good battery life
  • non-removable battery, no 5-GHz Wi-Fi, slow Wi-Fi, poor microphone quality

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(82%)
 
  Published: 2017-07-20, Author: Jessica , review by: cnet.com

  • Samsung's Galaxy J3 for 2017 has a low price, a removable battery and 256GB external storage
  • The J3 lags hard with less RAM than last year's model. Cameras are low-resolution compared to budget rivals
  • This year's Galaxy J3 is a lukewarm rehash of last year's great budget phone. Go for the Moto E4 instead...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2017-07-20, review by: cnet.com.au

  • Samsung's Galaxy J3 for 2017 has a low price, a removable battery and 256GB external storage
  • The J3 lags hard with less RAM than last year's model. Cameras are low-resolution compared to budget rivals
  • This year's Galaxy J3 is a lukewarm rehash of last year's great budget phone. Go for the Moto E4 instead...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2017-11-25, Author: Pierre , review by: androidpit.es

  • Precio asequible, MicroSD y Dual SIM, Batería
  • Sin lector de huellas dactilares, Rendimiento, Cámara
  • El Samsung Galaxy J3 (2017) es un buen smartphone Android que se adapta a los usuarios que buscan un teléfono polivalente, resistente y asequible. Aunque no destaque en ningún dominio en particular a parte de la autonomía, el J3 (2017) cumple bien con su...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2017-08-08, Author: Florian , review by: notebookcheck.org

  • Carcasa sólida y elegante, NFC, USB OTG, Módulo GPS muy preciso, Calidad de fotos de las cámaras decente, Amplias opciones de control, Pantalla brillante con modo exterior, temperaturas bajas, Muy buena duración de la batería
  • Batería no extraíble, No Wi-Fi de 5 GHz, Wi-Fi lento, Calidad de micrófono deficiente

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(82%)
 
  Published: 2017-07-20, Author: Jessica , review by: cnet.com/es/

  • El Samsung Galaxy J3 para 2017 tiene un precio bajo, una batería extraíble y 256GB de almacenamiento externo
  • El J3 se retrasa, pues tiene menos memoria RAM que el modelo del año pasado. Las cámaras son de baja resolución en comparación con sus rivales de bajo presupuesto
  • El Galaxy J3 de este año es una actualización mediocre del teléfono del año pasado. Mejor cómprate el Moto E4...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
    page 1 of 7 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 7   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×