uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Canon EOS 100D Rebel SL1



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon EOS 100D Rebel SL1

Testseek.co.uk have collected 182 expert reviews of the Canon EOS 100D Rebel SL1 and the average rating is 80%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon EOS 100D Rebel SL1.
Award: Good Buy May 2013
May 2013
 
(80%)
182 Reviews
Users
(95%)
1482 Reviews
80 0 100 182

The editors liked

  • Small body size
  • Touchscreen
  • Great image quality
  • Small size
  • Autofocus is swift
  • No compromise to image quality
  • Live view responsive
  • Engineering marvel in many respects
  • Battery life lasted well
  • Compact body
  • Lightweight
  • Good image quality
  • Smaller and lighter build makes carrying DSLR body and lens less of a drag
  • Yet more compact proportions haven’t obviously compromised picture quality
  • Extremely compact body for a DSLR with builtin flash
  • Excellent screen
  • Multitouch controls
  • Accurate display calibration
  • Userfriendly handling
  • Simple and effective controls
  • Responsiveness
  • Very fast to use
  • Picture quality
  • Perfectly usable up to 3200
  • Small
  • Light body
  • Live View performance
  • Great picture quality
  • Smaller and lighter build makes carrying DSLR body and lens less of a dra
  • Quality Canon 18MP stills
  • Good 1080/30p videos
  • Very fast
  • Accurate focusing
  • Good design including rubberised handgrip
  • Creative filters feature live preview
  • Strikingly small body

The editors didn't like

  • Overall system still large
  • Art filters only usable in Live View
  • Slow Live View focusing
  • Small size
  • Less advanced AF system than 700D and similar Canon models
  • Less featured than 700D and similar models
  • Viewfinder settings not particularly bright
  • Some viewfinder AF point bleed
  • No tilting LCD
  • Indoors shots can be soft
  • Not much cheaper than 700D
  • The lighter construction results in more obvious camera shake in lower light
  • No angle adjustable LCD plus a smaller handgrip than the 700D which costs just 50 quid more
  • 1855 STM kit lens isn't great
  • Sharpness could be better
  • Too bulky
  • Sound recorded in mono
  • No flip-out screen
  • Stripped-back controls
  • The 700D does more
  • The lighter construction results in more obvious camera shake in lower ligh
  • Grip may be too small for some
  • Mono onboard sound
  • Quality falls off after ISO 800
  • Similar price to the Canon EOS 700D
  • AF system only features one cross-type point
  • Small design means small battery

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 6 of 19
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2006-01-01, review by: dpreview.com

  • Abstract:  1. Introduction2. Specifications3. Body and Design4. Body and Design5. Operation & Controls6. Touchscreen & Hybrid AF7. First Impressions Canon EOS 100D/Rebel SL1 Hands-on Preview March 2013 | By Amadou Diallo Preview based on a pre-production Canon EOS...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-01-01, review by: dpreview.com

  • Very small and light with good grip for small to medium-size hands, High ISO shots are quite usable, even above ISO 6400, Excellent LCD and responsive touchscreen, Special coating minimizes fingerprint smudges from touchscreen use, Hybrid AF II / STM lens combo is noticeably improved for live view and movie shooting, Useful night modes, Chromatic aberration correction works well, Stereo mic jac
  • May be too small for those with larger hands, Grip may be insufficient for use with larger lenses, AF illuminator integrated into flash (must have flash engaged to use it), Flash produces red-eye in Night portrait mode, Non-STM lenses struggle in live view and in movie servo AF, Default dynamic range lags behind its peers,
  • Canon took the standard Rebel and whittled it into a smaller body, removing only a few features, while adding one very important one: improved live view autofocus. The result is a mature camera for the family photographer that's not a burden to bring ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(78%)
 
  Published: 2014-11-17, review by: canadianreviewer.com

  • Abstract:  Being a fan of all of the flagship cameras makes it painful for me to say that this is an unexciting offering from Canon's lower end consumer camera into the DSLR game. With Nikon and Sony releasing much more advanced consumer offerings, I often wonder wh...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-06-06, review by: avhub.com.au

  • Abstract:  While there is no doubt Nikon is currently doing great things in D-SLRs, it's also true that every major development in the category has been initiated by the Canon. It was first with enthusiast-level and then consumer-level models, first with video (alth...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-03-21, review by: techradar.com/au/

  • Small body size, Touchscreen, Great image quality
  • Overall system still large, Art filters only usable in Live View, Slow Live View focusing
  • Buying Guide Best full-frame DSLR What Canon has managed to produce in the EOS 100D is pretty special - a very small body that retains the same DSLR stylings of its larger siblings, and, more importantly, produces impressive image quality. That's quite a ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2013-08-19, Author: Barry , review by: pcauthority.com.au

  • A great DSLR in a more compact body...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(83%)
 
  Published: 2013-07-23, Author: Paul , review by: smarthouse.com.au

  • Good design including rubberised handgrip Creative filters feature live preview Strikingly small body
  • Similar price to the Canon EOS 700D AF system only features one cross, type point Small design means small battery

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2013-06-27, review by: brisbanetimes.com.au

  • The EOS 100D is small and light for a DSLR, but still bulkier than the Olympus OM-D E-M5. The tradeoff is that the Canon has a larger sensor and a true optical viewfinder. Who is it for? The occasional family chronicler, perhaps, or someone dissatisfied w...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-06-27, Author: terry , review by: dpexpert.com.au

  • The lens, while obviously made down to a price, is very fine, delivering consistently sharp and detailed images. By keeping the zoom range to a modest 3X there are few, in any, optical compromises. It is one of the best kit lenses we have tested.
  • The viewfinder is a little cramped and dim by comparison with DSLRs with true prism finders. This is nitpicking and certainly no deal breaker

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-06-26, review by: smh.com.au

  • Abstract:  DateJune 27, 2013 (1) Read later This 18-megapixel camera is Canon's smallest DSLR, competing with the largest mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras. Fitted inside the relatively petite body are the mechanicals and electronics of the large...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 6 of 19 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 19   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×