uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Pentax Q



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Pentax Q

Testseek.co.uk have collected 103 expert reviews of the Pentax Q and the average rating is 71%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Pentax Q.
 
(71%)
103 Reviews
Users
(89%)
42 Reviews
71 0 100 103

The editors liked

  • Excellent build
  • Stylish retro design
  • Standard flash hotshoe
  • Well designed built-in flash
  • Compact size
  • Extremely compact
  • Good colour reproduction
  • Small size
  • Colour
  • Image stabilisation
  • Images are better than most compact cameras
  • It's super-small
  • Better than many high-end compact cameras
  • Small but rugged
  • Great feature set
  • Superb pics
  • Smallest and lightest camera with swappable lenses
  • Wellbuilt
  • Very compact
  • Good build quality
  • Nice design and handling
  • Articulated arm positions the flash well
  • Good picture quality considering its tech specs
  • RAW mode
  • Tiny body yet still sports a rugged-feel build
  • Fun to use
  • Fits conveniently in a pocket if the lens is removed
  • Fast response times
  • Spy-gadget compactness
  • Good image quality
  • Surprisingly good ISO performance
  • Loads of creative/digital filter effects
  • Versatility
  • Build quality
  • Compact
  • Handling

The editors didn't like

  • Slow AF in low light
  • High price
  • Only a few additional lenses
  • Fiddly buttons
  • No video button
  • Fixed focal length when shooting videos
  • Expensive
  • Battery life
  • Image quality doesn't match DSLR
  • Lacks optical viewfinder
  • Crowded design.
  • Small sensor limits depth of field control
  • Stiff dials
  • Awkward layout
  • Sound is mono only
  • No clip on viewfinder
  • Larger hands will find the Q's small controls fiddly
  • Shortish battery life
  • Only mono sound for video clips
  • Slow to start up (3.5 seconds!) and general responsiveness could be better
  • Limited battery life
  • Picture quality can't match other mirrorless compacts
  • Sound quality in videos isn't great
  • Those with larger hands may find the Pentax Q’s rear controls small and fiddly
  • Battery life could be boosted
  • Audio on video clips is mono only
  • Limited depth of field
  • Uncompetitive price
  • Limited choice of compatible lenses
  • Small sensor for a CSC
  • Price

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 2 of 11
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-11-08, review by: techradar.com

  • Excellent build, Stylish retro design, Standard flash hotshoe, Well designed built-in flash, Compact size
  • Slow AF in low light, High price, Only a few additional lenses, Fiddly buttons, No video button
  • ForExcellent buildStylish retro designStandard flash hotshoeWell designed built-in flashCompact size...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(40%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-29, Author: Tony , review by: amateurphotographer.co.uk

  • No one can deny that the Pentax Q adds a little colour to the market. Its main talking points will always be its size, for reasons good and bad. The current ‘smallest interchangeable-lens camera uses a much smaller sensor, but this is central to its bein...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-27, Author: Audley , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Spy-gadget compactness, Good image quality, Surprisingly good ISO performance, Loads of creative/digital filter effects
  • Limited depth of field, Fiddly buttons, Uncompetitive price, Limited choice of compatible lenses
  • While the Pentax Q might look like a miniature DSLR, at heart it's very much an advanced compact and this needs to be kept in mind when judging overall image quality. Compared against other compacts using a 1/2.3in sensor, including those that fall within...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-22, Author: Jeremy , review by: reviewed.com

  • Impressively, the Pentax Q offers a good amount of manual controls in video mode, including the ability to set aperture, shutter speed, and ISO during recording. Many of the cameras in this class include little to no controls in video mode, so we're happy...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-20, Author: TJ , review by: reviewed.com

  • The design philosophy of a typical compact system aims to pack as large an image sensor as possible while shaving down other components, achieving a more portable body than a full-size DSLR. The Pentax Q turns this notion on its head, aiming instead to mi...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-20, Author: TJ , review by: reviewed.com

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-04, review by: pocket-lint.com

  • It's super-small, better than many high-end compact cameras
  • Small sensor limits depth of field control, stiff dials, awkward layout, expensive
  • The Pentax Q is without doubt the smallest interchangeable camera system on the market. However the Q’s small, 1/2.3inch sensor may be good compared to compact cameras but has nothing against more serious models. As sweet as it may look, the Q lacks pa...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-01, Author: Gavin , review by: T3.com

  • Small but rugged, Great feature set, Superb pics
  • Battery life, Sound is mono only, No clip on viewfinder
  • If you were holding off buying a Compact System Camera until you could find one that could fit in a jacket (or at a squeeze trouser) pocket before taking the plunge, then that point has arrived with the Pentax Q. Though the styling may not be as luxur

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-09-20, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • Amazingly small, frustratingly slow and worryingly expensive, but we can't help but warm to this quirky little compact system camera ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2012-05-09, review by: imaging-resource.com

  • Compact body is in a class of its own compared to other mirrorless cameras, Great build quality and good ergonomics considering the size, Shoots like a real camera, not a gadget, High Performance-series optics match the camera's build quality, Sensor-s...
  • Lens selection is very limited so far, Unique-series lenses are very limited in terms of capability, Shallow depth-of-field is hard to achieve, Blur Control function is hit and miss, Need to use large apertures for maximum sharpness; diffraction-limiti...
  • When Pentax announced the tiny Pentax Q compact system camera in the middle of last year, it instantly polarized opinions. Some loved it for its truly compact proportions, fulfilling a promise that they felt other mirrorless cameras had failed to truly...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 2 of 11 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×