uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Lenses » Nikon AF 60mm f/2.8D Micro-Nikkor



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Nikon AF 60mm f/2.8D Micro-Nikkor

Testseek.co.uk have collected 16 expert reviews of the Nikon AF 60mm f/2.8D Micro-Nikkor and the average rating is 54%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Nikon AF 60mm f/2.8D Micro-Nikkor.
 
(54%)
16 Reviews
Users
(91%)
7 Reviews
54 0 100 16

 

Reviews

page 1 of 2
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-05-16, Author: Angela , review by: camerajabber.com

  • If you have a large collection of slides or film and a high-quality Nikon DSLR like the D850, the Nikon ES-2 Film Digitizing Adapter is a convenient way to digitise them. It won't be a fast exercise but it's feasible to digitise slides, transparencies and...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-11-15, Author: Paul , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  If you've invested in Nikon's D500 APS-C DSLR, you're no doubt delighted with its excellent build, tilting touch-screen LCD, new joystick control, chunky ergonomic handgrip, and large viewfinder. It's a high-performance APS-C option, too, that includes th...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-01-23, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  Following the lens recommendations for Nikon D7100 and entry-level D3200, we've now turned our attention to the new mid-range D5300. We've tested the camera with more than 140 Nikkor and third-party prime and zoom models to assess image quality. Read onto...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(44%)
 
  Published: 2013-11-21, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  Following on from the lens recommendations for the earlier full-frame Nikon D600, we've now had the opportunity to assess a wide range lenses with that model's replacement, the 24-Mpix D610. We've analyzed a total of 95 Nikkor and third-party prime and zo...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(54%)
 
  Published: 2013-10-24, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  Following the recommendations for Nikon D7100, we've had the opportunity to assess another of the firm's 24-Mpix DX format cameras – the mid-range D5200 - with over 120 Nikkor and third-party prime and zoom models to assess image quality. Read onto find o...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(40%)
 
  Published: 2013-10-08, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  This is the second part of our lens recommendations for the Nikon D7100 where we've analyzed nearly 60 Nikkor and third-party standard and portrait prime and zoom models to assess their optical quality. Read onto find out which of these lenses are the bes...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(42%)
 
  Published: 2012-01-26, review by: Slrgear.com

  • Abstract:  While intended as a macro lens, this 60mmm f/2.8 optic would also make a decent portrait lens on Nikon digital SLRs: With the 1.5x crop factor of Nikon's DX sensors, this lens equates to about a 90mm lens on a 35mm camera.I confess to being a bit unpleasa...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(92%)
 
  Published: 2011-07-12, review by: The-digital-picture.com

  • Abstract:  While I hope to create a full Nikon 60mm f/2.8D AF Micro Lens, my first priority is to include results from this lens in the lens comparison tools available on the site. This page currently exists because it is required by the database and content mana...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-01-29, review by: photo.net

  • Abstract:  Nikon calls their macro lenses "micro-Nikkors". This is a bit odd considering that they only focus down to 1:1 (still in the macro range) and that they are anything but micro in size. The series includes a 60, a 105, and a 200. My favorite lens is the...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-05-07, review by: Kenrockwell.com

  • Abstract:  for details. If I did get one of these, Id get the older and less expensive AF-D, which costs less and has slightly better overall optical quality. Id get the more expensive AF-S version only if I intended to use it on the cheapest D40, D40x or D60,...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 2 « Previous   1 2   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×