uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 3 2200G 3.5GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G 3.5GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.co.uk have collected 324 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 3 2200G 3.5GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 3 2200G 3.5GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Highest Rated February 2018
February 2018
 
(84%)
324 Reviews
Users
(94%)
18 Reviews
84 0 100 324

The editors liked

  • Very solid value
  • Best-in-class IGP
  • Intel-like energy efficiency
  • Increasing motherboard choice
  • Affordable
  • Decent gaming performance
  • Onboard graphics are convenient for slim builds
  • Low platform cost
  • Easy to overclock
  • Sense MI technologies
  • Low Power use
  • Excellent Value
  • Competitive CPU Performance
  • Compelling integrated Vegas GPU
  • Genuine upgrade path (AM4 socket compatibility)
  • Neutral
  • - Can get a little warm
  • - Only 8x PCIe l
  • An impressive evolution of the APU
  • Punchy CPU for day-to-day tasks
  • 25-30 FPS gaming at 1080p with no dGPU
  • Low power requirements
  • Cheaper and more powerful than the Ryzen 3 1200 it replaces
  • Excellent thermal performance on stock cooler
  • Can be overclo
  • Gaming-capable onboard graphics
  • Convenient all-in-one design
  • Good overall CPU performance
  • Playable 1080p gaming with popular titles
  • Incredibly affordable

The editors didn't like

  • Stability concerns still linger
  • Single-thread performance is lacking
  • Modest processor performance
  • Can handle only the least demanding games
  • Early uptake/teething issues
  • Memory performance has a huge impact on overall system performance due to the nature of this CPUs design
  • We strongly recommend using 2933-3200 memory
  • Neutral
  • Only supports 8x PCIe not 16x
  • But that’s unlikely to be of concern for any GPU that would lik
  • CPU not as fast as Intel rivals
  • Struggles with the most graphically rich games
  • Early driver incompatibilities
  • Intel still leads in computational power

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 2 of 33
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-02-12, Author: Matthew , review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • These new AMD APUs are long overdue. Ryzen successfully reasserted AMD as a strong competitor in the mainstream CPU market, giving customers more cores (or threads at the very least) for less money and forcing Intel to do the same in turn, but every deskt...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-02-12, Author: Jayce , review by: Digitaltrends.com

  • Affordable, Decent gaming performance, Onboard graphics are convenient for slim builds
  • Modest processor performance, Can handle only the least demanding games
  • In most cases, you shouldn't bother with either the Ryzen 5 2400G or the Ryzen 3 2200G — just buy the Ryzen 5 1600 or Intel Core i3-8100 and pair them with a discrete graphics card. The Ryzen APUs are the option of last resort for budget gaming and, shoul...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-02-12, Author: Edward , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Gaming-capable onboard graphics, Convenient all-in-one design, Good overall CPU performance
  • CPU not as fast as Intel rivals, Struggles with the most graphically rich games
  • The ideal processors for small-form-factor or budget gaming PCs...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2018-02-12, Author: Peter , review by: eteknix.com

  • An impressive evolution of the APU, Punchy CPU for day-to-day tasks, 25-30 FPS gaming at 1080p with no dGPU, Low power requirements, Cheaper and more powerful than the Ryzen 3 1200 it replaces, Excellent thermal performance on stock cooler, Can be overclo
  • Memory performance has a huge impact on overall system performance due to the nature of this CPUs design, we strongly recommend using 2933-3200 memory, Neutral, Only supports 8x PCIe not 16x, but that’s unlikely to be of concern for any GPU that would lik
  • If you're building an affordable system for a bit of casual gaming, something for the office, a family computer, or anything like that, it's a no-brainer. We think it would be great for a multimedia system, emulator rig, or small form factor PC too, so th...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2019-05-08, review by: techgage.com

  • We recently updated our Linux testing suite a wee bit, making minor changes, but at the expense of dropping all single-threaded benchmarks – by accident. We hadn't thought much about every single set of results being hugely optimized for core counts, whic...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-01-14, Author: Ian , review by: anandtech.com

  • Battling CPUs at $60 is going to be a tough call. Do you throw the best hardware around the chip that money can buy to compare the absolute limits of the hardware under ideal conditions, or do you keep it more reasonable for the price bracket it is intend...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-12-25, review by: benchmarkreviews.com

  • Can't be overclocked and lacks HyperThreading, Conclusion
  • We hope that this article has helped you find the right CPU for your gaming PC. As you can see, it doesn't really matter what your budget is because great gaming CPUs are available within any budget. If you consider yourself to be a casual gamer, a budget...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-12-14, review by: benchmarkreviews.com

  • Price. Limited value for money, Conclusion
  • Regardless of what your budget is, there's a CPU that can meet your needs without emptying your bank account. Faster and more efficient CPUs are released every year, so there's no reason to pay for more than what you really need. But if you're an avid gam...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-11-26, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Battlefield V is playable on quad-cores but you can expect frequent frame dips, resulting in less consistent frame rates. For the most part, we've found that the older Core i5-7600K has been hanging in there pretty well with AAA titles released in 2018, b...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-11-02, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Abstract:  Not that long ago we reviewed the $60 Athlon 200GE CPU and we've been wanting to come back to it for more, but it's been a hectic October with must-have coverage that included the RTX 2070, the Core i9-9900K and new Threadripper models. But it's finally t...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 2 of 33 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 33   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×