uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 3 2200G 3.5GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G 3.5GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.co.uk have collected 324 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 3 2200G 3.5GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 3 2200G 3.5GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Highest Rated February 2018
February 2018
 
(84%)
324 Reviews
Users
(94%)
18 Reviews
84 0 100 324

The editors liked

  • Very solid value
  • Best-in-class IGP
  • Intel-like energy efficiency
  • Increasing motherboard choice
  • Affordable
  • Decent gaming performance
  • Onboard graphics are convenient for slim builds
  • Low platform cost
  • Easy to overclock
  • Sense MI technologies
  • Low Power use
  • Excellent Value
  • Competitive CPU Performance
  • Compelling integrated Vegas GPU
  • Genuine upgrade path (AM4 socket compatibility)
  • Neutral
  • - Can get a little warm
  • - Only 8x PCIe l
  • An impressive evolution of the APU
  • Punchy CPU for day-to-day tasks
  • 25-30 FPS gaming at 1080p with no dGPU
  • Low power requirements
  • Cheaper and more powerful than the Ryzen 3 1200 it replaces
  • Excellent thermal performance on stock cooler
  • Can be overclo
  • Gaming-capable onboard graphics
  • Convenient all-in-one design
  • Good overall CPU performance
  • Playable 1080p gaming with popular titles
  • Incredibly affordable

The editors didn't like

  • Stability concerns still linger
  • Single-thread performance is lacking
  • Modest processor performance
  • Can handle only the least demanding games
  • Early uptake/teething issues
  • Memory performance has a huge impact on overall system performance due to the nature of this CPUs design
  • We strongly recommend using 2933-3200 memory
  • Neutral
  • Only supports 8x PCIe not 16x
  • But that’s unlikely to be of concern for any GPU that would lik
  • CPU not as fast as Intel rivals
  • Struggles with the most graphically rich games
  • Early driver incompatibilities
  • Intel still leads in computational power

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 5 of 33
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-02-12, Author: Ryan , review by: pcper.com

  • The AMD Ryzen Processor with Radeon Vega Graphics, which is it its official name, does exactly what we thought it would do for AMD. It brings the revitalization of the Zen architecture to a market and class of product that previously had been without it...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-02-12, Author: Jeff , review by: Techreport.com

  • AMD's Ryzen processors with Vega integrated graphics would seem to fix lots of things that prevented past APUs from finding a foothold in the market. Fast DDR4 memory offers copious bandwidth to a powerful Vega GPU. The Zen CPU core puts up competitive p...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-02-12, Author: Marco , review by: hothardware.com

  • Great Integrated Graphics, Low Power, Unlocked CPU and GPU, Works In Existing AM4 Motherboards
  • Slower In Some Circunstances, Requires Expensive Memory To Shine
  • GPU performance is easier to summarize, however. The Vega 11 and Vega 8 GPU engines integrated into these first Raven Ridge processors are head-and-shoulders better than any other integrated solution currently on the market – bar none. For causal or entry...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2018-02-12, Author: Mark , review by: overclock3d.net

  • Abstract:  While AMD's Ryzen series of CPUs were highly successful, it is undeniable that they were unable to cover the whole PC market, leaving behind the lucrative integrated graphics market while the company focused on their high-end ambitions. Summit Ridge was a...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-02-12, Author: Shawn , review by: overclockers.com

  • Overall, the performance from AMD's newest addition to the Ryzen stable is quite impressive. When comparing them to the A10-7870K, from a computing perspective there really is no contest and the graphics performance has nearly doubled. Looking at the numb...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-02-12, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Exceptional CPU and GPU performance at their respective price points. GPU performance crushes Intel integrated graphics, around discrete GeForce GT 1030 levels. Included Wraith cooler. Great motherboard support, especially on a budget
  • Current memory pricing messes with the total value offered by AMD's APU platform and memory speed matters in this case. Graphics drivers are a little immature (this could turn out to be a pro in a few weeks' time)

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2018-02-12, Author: Hilbert , review by: guru3d.com

  • There is a certain kind of people (not our reader-base), that do not want to fork out cash for a dedicated graphics card. These guys and gals hardly play games, and when they do. they really do not care too much about resolution and quality. Then there'...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2018-02-12, Author: Alex , review by: gizmodo.com

  • Abstract:  In the past year, graphics cards have gone from the reasonably priced computer part you pick up on Amazon or Newegg to something bordering on as precious as gold. If you happen to find one being sold at its MSRP, you can easily snatch it up and sell it on...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-02-08, Author: Mark , review by: overclock3d.net

  • Abstract:  Today is unboxing day for the Ryzen 3 2200G and the Ryzen 5 2400G, leaving us in a tricky position where we are allowed to show you guys the product, but in a situation where we are not allowed to tell you guys about the finer details.  We will have a rev...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-10-20, Author: Luke , review by: techspot.com

  • Battlefield V is playable on quad-cores but you can expect frequent frame dips, resulting in less consistent frame rates. For the most part, we've found that the older Core i5-7600K has been hanging in there pretty well with AAA titles released in 2018...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 5 of 33 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 33   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×