uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 3.5GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 3.5GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.co.uk have collected 277 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 3.5GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 80%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 3.5GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Most Awarded April 2017
April 2017
 
(80%)
277 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
80 0 100 277

The editors liked

  • Exceptional value for money
  • Quad-core performance at dual-core prices
  • Latest AM4 platform
  • Easy to overclock to 4GHz
  • Able to compete with more expensive processors from Intel
  • Ideal for 1080P gaming systems
  • Low TDP and temperatures
  • Unlocked ratio multiplier
  • Multithreaded performance
  • Affordable pricing
  • Chipset promises future upgradability
  • Intuitive overclocking software
  • Multi-threaded performance is far better than Intel's price competitors
  • Single-threaded XFR boost to 3.9GHz is a high clock speed for this price point
  • Allows for manual overclocking with an unlocked core multiplier
  • Clock frequency helps it overcome IPC

The editors didn't like

  • Falls behind in rendering tasks
  • Neutral
  • Higher memory latency than Intel
  • But it doesn’t have a big impact on real-world performance
  • “The R5 1500X is offering reliable performance for mid-range gaming system builds at bargain prices. Like the legendary
  • Unoptimized software ecosystem
  • IPC throughput deficit
  • Poor overclocking on stock cooling
  • Only four cores
  • Gaming performance is behind that of Intel's competition
  • Power draw in our Cinebench measurements is disproportionately higher than Intel's competition
  • Worth a $20 upgrade over the 1400 but the six-core 1600 is only $30 more expensive

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 27 of 28
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-03-24, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • Abstract:  AMD在三月初发布了锐龙Ryzen 7处理器,强劲的性能与极佳的性价比受到了玩家大量的好评,市场的反应也相当火,三款产品卖得都相当好,不过首批的Ryzen 7毕竟是高端的八核,售价2499元起步受众还是比较少的,目前来说对Intel的影响有限,而下个月要发售锐龙 AMD Ryzen 5处理器才是直刺要害。锐龙AMD Ryzen 5处理器将在4月11日全球发售,包括6核12线程的Ryzen 5 1600X、Ryzen 5 1600,4核8线程的Ryzen 5 1500X、Ryzen 5 1400,...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-07-07, Author: soothepain , review by: coolaler.com

  • Abstract:  AMD Ryzen 5 系列中有4核心以及6核心兩種,最近剛好入手了兩顆,Ryzen 5 1600X 與 1500X,雖然說這兩顆處理器是有一點價差,不過錢要花也要花在刀口,如何選擇適合自己的也很重要,此篇將比較核心效能、遊戲效能、溫度以及功耗表現。 Ryzen 5 1600X 為6核心12執行緒,基本時脈為3.6GHz,Turbo最高為4GHz,L2快取3MB,L3快取16MB,預設TDP 95W,目前售價是8900元,市售版本不帶風扇;Ryzen 5 1500X 為4核心8執行緒,基本時脈為3.5G...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-06-20, Author: lin.sinchen , review by: xfastest.com

  • 從測試結果來分析,R5 1600 與 R5 1600X 在相同核心數目下,因為 TDP 設計與時脈不同,本身有著效能上的差異,但這差距並沒有非常的高,但與之相對的 R5 1600 在溫度表現上差異甚多;而 4 核心的 R5 1500X 與 1400 僅在時脈上有著差異,倘若 R5 1400 可超頻至 3.7GHz,則會有著相當好的性價比,這也是 Ryzen 可超頻的好處,讓玩家挑選最適合預算的處理器,在通過超頻來提升效能。R5、R7 有著多核心與 SMT 加持,整體效能在多核心應用中,有著相當好的表現,但...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-05-26, Author: dennis.F , review by: mobile01.com

  • Abstract:  AMD今年在處理器市場終於推出全新的RYZEN系列處理器,並針對不同市場需求推出了RYZEN 7、RYZEN 5以及RYZEN 3等三個系列產品,目前其中的RYZEN 7與RYZEN 5已經開賣一段時間,小編之前也已經有詳細介紹過兩個系列處理器的技術功能與硬體規格,不過因為之前只有針對各系列的高階款進行測試,所以這次便直接借了RYZEN 7與RYZEN 5一共七款型號的處理器來進行測試,希望能夠讓網友們能夠更方便做個比較參考。 關於AMD RYZEN 7與RYZEN 5處理器的硬體規格與架構技術方面,...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-05-11, Author: coolaler , review by: coolaler.com

  • Abstract:  前不久曾測試 AMD Ryzen 5開賣 Intel i5 挫得等? R5 1600X之多工應用拳打 i7-7700K腳踢 i5-7600K 還未看過的會員歡迎 點我前往 今天再加入三顆 Ryzen 5,分別是1600及 1500X及1400的測試 AMD Ryzen 5 1600將與 i7-7700K抓對廝殺 AMD Ryzen 5 1500X及 Ryzen 5 1400則與 i5-7600K比拚 新加入的 AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Ryzen 5 1500X Ryzen 5 1400照片...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: dennis.F , review by: mobile01.com

  • Abstract:  AMD繼RYZEN 7系列處理器之後,RYZEN 5系列處理器也終於正式上市。就其型號命名可以看得出AMD RYZEN 5系列的目標對手是Intel Core i5系列,但憑著核心數量以及多執行緒功能的加持下,其中最高階的AMD RYZEN 5 1600X處理器效能其實已經能夠與Intel Core i7-7700K一較高下,甚至在一些影音轉檔或是較吃重多核心效能的測試中還能夠有著20~40%左右的效能優勢,再加上比對手更低的定價策略,讓這次新推出的RYZEN 5系列處理器同樣有著高C/P值的表現。...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: 宮崎真一 , review by: 4gamer.net

  • Ryzen 5 1500Xも対i5-7500で94~97%程度だ。「DOOM」の結果がグラフ7になるが,DOOMはゲームの仕様上,200fpsが上限となり,ここでは1920×1080ドットと1600×900ドットのスコアが意味を成していない。そこで2560×1440ドットのスコアを見ていくことになるが,DOOMでもSMTは有効にしたほうがスコアは伸びる傾向となった。競合との比較だと,SMTを有効化したRyzen 5 1600Xはi5-7600Kと互角。SMTを有効化したRyzen 5 1500Xはi5-7...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, review by: ascii.jp

  • Abstract:  Ryzen 7 はライバルの約半分の価格で8コア16スレッド、全製品倍率ロックフリーを武器にしたが、性能も従来のAMD製CPUの常識(安いぶん性能は控えめ)を一気に覆した。そして本日4月11日、Ryzen 7の下位モデルとなる「Ryzen 5」シリーズの発売が封切られた。諸般の事情で4製品中「1600X」および「1600」の上位2モデルのみが11日解禁、残りの「1500X」および「1400」に関しては発売日が4月15日に延期されてしまったが、今回も競合するインテル製品よりも“安くてもコア数が多く高パフォー...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-08, Author: 정수형 , review by: inven.co.kr

  • Abstract:  고사양의 인기게임이 등장하면 대다수의 게이머들은 게임을 즐기기 위해 평소에 사용하던 컴퓨터의 성능을 점검하고 부족한 부분을 업그레이드하거나 아예 새로운 컴퓨터를 구매한다. 하지만, 게임의 최소사양를 확인하고 그에 맞춰나가는 일련의 행동은 컴퓨터에 대한 전문지식이 없는 사람에게는 매우 어렵고 피곤한 일로 느껴질 것이다. 따라서 보통은 일단 게임을 돌려본 후 상황에 따라 옵션을 조절하지만, 게임의 성능을 낮추기 위해 옵션창에 들어가 봐도 한국말인데 이해할...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-20, Author: 김영우 , review by: donga.com

  • Abstract:  IT동아 김영우 기자] 거의 10여년 이상 PC용 CPU 시장에서 '추운 겨울'을 보내던 AMD에 드디어 봄인 온 것 같다. 지난 3월 첫 출시된 신제품인 '라이젠 7(Ryzen 7)' 덕분이다. 고급형 CPU 시장을 거의 독점하다시피 했던 인텔의 코어 i7의 경쟁제품으로 개발된 이 제품은, 우수한 성능을 발휘하면서 상대적으로 저렴한 가격을 내세워 많은 주목을 받았다.하지만 고급형 CPU 시장은 상징적인 의미가 크지만, 시장 자체의 볼륨은 그다지 크지...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 27 of 28 « Previous   1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×