uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.co.uk have collected 224 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 67%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
 
(67%)
224 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
67 0 100 224

The editors liked

  • Innovative architecture design
  • Very overclockable
  • Power efficient using Cool 'n' Quiet
  • Improved Turbo modes
  • Great overclocking
  • Serious multi-threading chops for less than £200
  • Eight cores and loads of clock speed at a reasonable price
  • Modern design
  • Elegant modular architecture
  • Attractive pricing
  • AM3socket is backwards compatible
  • Performance in applications makes effective use of multiple cores
  • Two Turbo modes
  • Architecture design
  • Multipliers are unlocked out of the box
  • Overclocks well
  • Good scaling
  • Faster than the Core i5 2500k
  • Performs exceptionally well with modern gaming engines

The editors didn't like

  • Weak single thread performance
  • Often outperformed by Phenom II
  • Only fast in ideal scenarios
  • Only slightly faster at stock than 1100T
  • Struggles against 2500K
  • And is pricier
  • Performance is unimpressive
  • And the power draw is too high.
  • Not as fast as Thuban (1100T) in lightload apps
  • Underload powerdraw not ideal
  • Arguably still behind Intel's SB as an allround chip
  • Power consumption
  • Performances should be higher compared with competitors' CPUs and AMD's older models
  • Expensive
  • Performance left us wanting more
  • UK pricing is high
  • Putting it head to head against Core i7 2600k
  • When Core i5 2500k is overclocked it is closely matched
  • And costs less
  • 990FXA motherboards are still expensive
  • Kitguru says
  • A high performance processor
  • But the launch is hampered wit

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 6 of 23
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: hitechlegion.com

  • Incredible Multi Threaded Performance, Excellent Price/Performance Ratio, Smooth Working Turbo Core For Speed Boost, Dual Turbo Modes For Increased Boost In Lightly Threaded Apps, Maintains Excellent Temps At Stock Speeds, Black Edition With Unlocked Multiplier, Eight Physical Cores, Easily Achieves High Overclocks, Excellent OC Performance Scaling, Easily Tweaked With AOD For Maximum Performan
  • Performance In Single Threaded Apps Not On Par With Multithreaded, Gold, Discuss this review in our forums
  • It’s been a long wait for Bulldozer’s arrival, with the date being pushed back again and again. Naturally, that had me going in looking for the flaw that kept it from coming to market on any of the previous announced release dates. Was the architectur...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, Author: Nick , review by: icrontic.com

  • Bulldozer is the culmination of five years of effort and considerable heartache for AMD. They had a solid lead on Intel with the Athlon 64, but steadily lost momentum to Intel’s aggressive Tick Tock strategy over the ensuing half decade. AMD seemed to...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: anandtech.com

  • In many cases, AMD's FX-8150 is able to close the gap between the Phenom II X6 and Intel's Core i5 2500K. Given the right workload, Bulldozer is actually able to hang with Intel's fastest Sandy Bridge parts. We finally have a high-end AMD CPU with power g...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: techspot.com

  • Breaking down our benchmark results we find that the AMD FX-8150 offers huge performance improvements over the Phenom II range when testing with Excel 2010, while it matched the Core i5-2500K and Core i7 920 processors. Our custom WinRAR benchmark als...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: neoseeker.com

  • Honestly, AMD's Bulldozer didn't turn out as impressive as it sounded. In many applications, it is barely better than the Phenom II X6 1100T, and in a few others it's actually worse. However, these applications either weren't highly multi-threaded, or ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: madshrimps.be

  • time Alrighty, time to give a small overview of the previous pages : The AMD FX-8150 CPU out of the box, is not really what many might have expected. Why ? As it is hardly any better in older apps then the previous AMD Thuban lineup. I explicitly ment...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: tomshardware.com

  • So, let’s say someone puts Core i5-2500K and FX-8150 in front of you. The Core i5 costs $220 bucks, and the FX runs $245. Which one do you buy? If it’s me, I’m going with the Core i5. I gave the -2500K a Tom’s Hardware Recommended Buy award back in Jan...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, Author: James , review by: pureoverclock.com

  • AMD has been buzzing along as of late with the release of Zacate and Llano. The new direction of the company has really been a breath of fresh air especially with the introduction of “Fusion” technology. The on-die GPU’s that support DX11 are simply gr...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: guru3d.com

  • It is nice and fast in your desktop environment with the many threads you can fire off at it, and if you love to compress, transcode or use your PC as a workstation, well it will offer heaps of performance and features for a fair price. The AMD FX 8150 ca...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, Author: Scott , review by: Techreport.com

  • You've seen the performance results and probably have a sense of where things stand, but we can summarize them with more precision using one of our world-famous price-performance scatter plots. (We've omitted a few really expensive CPUs, because they ten...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 6 of 23 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 23   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×