uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.co.uk have collected 224 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 67%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
 
(67%)
224 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
67 0 100 224

The editors liked

  • Innovative architecture design
  • Very overclockable
  • Power efficient using Cool 'n' Quiet
  • Improved Turbo modes
  • Great overclocking
  • Serious multi-threading chops for less than £200
  • Eight cores and loads of clock speed at a reasonable price
  • Modern design
  • Elegant modular architecture
  • Attractive pricing
  • AM3socket is backwards compatible
  • Performance in applications makes effective use of multiple cores
  • Two Turbo modes
  • Architecture design
  • Multipliers are unlocked out of the box
  • Overclocks well
  • Good scaling
  • Faster than the Core i5 2500k
  • Performs exceptionally well with modern gaming engines

The editors didn't like

  • Weak single thread performance
  • Often outperformed by Phenom II
  • Only fast in ideal scenarios
  • Only slightly faster at stock than 1100T
  • Struggles against 2500K
  • And is pricier
  • Performance is unimpressive
  • And the power draw is too high.
  • Not as fast as Thuban (1100T) in lightload apps
  • Underload powerdraw not ideal
  • Arguably still behind Intel's SB as an allround chip
  • Power consumption
  • Performances should be higher compared with competitors' CPUs and AMD's older models
  • Expensive
  • Performance left us wanting more
  • UK pricing is high
  • Putting it head to head against Core i7 2600k
  • When Core i5 2500k is overclocked it is closely matched
  • And costs less
  • 990FXA motherboards are still expensive
  • Kitguru says
  • A high performance processor
  • But the launch is hampered wit

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 9 of 23
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-10-31, review by: atomicmpc.com.au

  • Too slow for the price, designed for workloads that just don’t exist at the moment....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-14, review by: tweaktown.com

  • Nothing annoys me more than the inability to review a product. It doesn't happen very often, especially when we move outside the realm of the product being DOA or it not making it through all our tests. Two products have eluded me over the last twelv...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: tweaktown.com

  • After our through the normal CPU gauntlet of tests, it's clear that at the moment the full potential of Bulldozer just can't be utilized. I think a large problem in regards to the Bulldozer architecture is we just haven't got the applications at th...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(83%)
 
  Published: 2011-11-21, Author: Paul , review by: pcworld.co.nz

  • Abstract:  October marked a special occasion for CPU manufacturer AMD – it released its first completely new processor design since 2003. Athlon 64, for those that remember, heralded the golden age for AMD where by and large its chips matched or beat the performa...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2012-03-21, review by: pcquest.com

  • It has heating issues but comes nicely packaged and so is easy to carry and connect. PrintCommentEmailDiggDel.icio.usRedditTwitter ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-03-19, Author: Sumon , review by: ocfreaks.com

  • Well…AMD was kind enough to send us a package and we found a NEW CPU inside!Since we got the chip might as well do a review of it…lets see how it stacks up against its direct competitor the Intel Core i5 2500KA few words on BulldozerAMD really reinvented ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-18, Author: Roydon , review by: firstpost.com

  • You would assume that a 8-core CPU would cost you an arm and a leg, but that’s not the case with AMD. The FX-8150, their flagship CPU, retails for just Rs.15,500, which is the same price as the Core i7-2600K. Even though this has 8 cores, sadly that do...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2012-10-03, review by: hardwarezone.com.my

  • Abstract:  In May this year, AMD officially launched its Trinity Accelerated Processing Unit (APU) that features the next generation APU architecture. It is built on a mature 32nm SOI process technology, using a second revision of the Bulldozer architecture. At its ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-07-03, Author: Lennard , review by: vr-zone.com

  • Abstract:  After months of BIOS firmware updates and software patches, both platforms from Intel and AMD should have reached some level of maturity by now. We run a myriad of tests with HD 7970 GHz Edition CrossfireX and G.Skill 16GB 2400MHz ram to see how everythin...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-27, review by: tbreak.ae

  • Eight cores fully unlocked; Decent stock ad Turbo speeds; Runs cool at stock speeds; Cheap entry point,
  • Outperformed by Intel offering; Runs very hot during overclock; Not much software in the market optimized for eight cores

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
    page 9 of 23 « Previous   1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 23   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×