uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.co.uk have collected 347 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice March 2017
March 2017
 
(84%)
347 Reviews
Users
(98%)
17 Reviews
84 0 100 347

The editors liked

  • 65W TDP (Cool running
  • Impressive performance perWatt)
  • 8/16 cores threads
  • Easy to overclock
  • Very competitive price
  • Supplied with RGB LED cooler
  • 8 cores
  • 16 threads for under £320
  • Impressive multi-core performance
  • Lower TDP than 1700X or 1800X
  • Wide range of modern AM4 boards
  • Makes Core i7 X99 seem ultra-expensive
  • Competitive price
  • 8-Core w/ 16 Threads
  • New AM4 platform
  • Very easy to overclock
  • Can closely match the 1800X while overclocked
  • Precision Boost and XFR
  • Excellent performance in rendering (Cinebench)
  • Good gaming performance
  • Unlocked ratio multiplier
  • Lowcost eight core
  • 65W TDP
  • Bundled cooler
  • Eight cores
  • Faster than the the Ryzen 7 1800X when overclocked
  • Excellent multi-threaded performance that is vastly superior to that of the Core i7-7700K
  • Competitive performance against Intel processors three times its price
  • Up to 3.75GHz XFR frequency helps single-threaded performance
  • Unlocked CPU multiplier and o

The editors didn't like

  • No XFRtechnology
  • Specific memory requirements
  • Single-thread is good but not great
  • Gaming optimisations still needed
  • None
  • Neutral
  • Memory performance still has a few bugs
  • But we expect these to be fixed with a BIOS update
  • Like all 8-core chips
  • It can get quite warm
  • So a powerful cooler is recommended
  • Price is very similar to the more established i7-7700K
  • “The Ryz
  • Lower stock performance than other Ryzen 7 models
  • Lower game performance than Intel processors
  • Poorly optimized software ecosystem
  • Low stock speed
  • Not as fast in lightly threaded tasks as Intel chips
  • Gaming performance is not best suited for ultra-high refresh rates and trails i7-7700K levels (outside of GPU-limited scenarios)
  • Lower memory frequency support compared to Kaby Lake

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 35
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Nathan , review by: legitreviews.com

  • The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Threadripper 1920X are very impressive processors that did extremely well in content creation benchmarks that take advantage of having a 16-core, 32-thread processor in the system. The good news is a good number of app...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Steve , review by: gamersnexus.net

  • By name and by marketing, the i5 CPU is most comparable to the R5 CPUs. The R5 2600's current $160 price-point makes it a less direct comparison, and the 2600X, which would perform about where an overclocked 2600 performs, is about $220. This is also...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-02, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • We have some interesting results to discuss. Let's start with the Core i7-6900K and 7820X.It was shocking to find that when comparing clock-for-clock performance using the same memory speed on both setups, the older 6900K was faster in every single game w...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-07-27, review by: armchairempire.com

  • Great value for money considering its multi-threaded performance and more than decent single thread performance, Easily overclocks should the need ever arise, Default power requirement is pretty low considering it is an eight-core processor, The cheapest
  • Lack of game optimization makes Intel quad-cores a better bet, Draws excessive power when overclocked, Single thread performance does not come close to Intel flagship models, Should You Buy The AMD Ryzen 1700
  • The Ryzen 1700 is a much welcome addition to the CPU marketplace and one that will definitely force Intel to up its game. Even if the 1800X does not manage to topple Intel top performers, it will force Intel to reduce its costs.We feel with time and more...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-07-27, Author: garfi3ld , review by: lanoc.org

  • Abstract:  Its hard to believe considering we just finished up an Intel launch, but it is already time to check out Intel’s next launch. Kaby Lake was launched at the beginning of this year and the Mainstream lineup of CPUs is getting refreshed with Coffee Lake and Z370. This is the 8th generation of Intel’s Core processors going back to the original launch back in 2006...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-07-14, review by: Computerpoweruser.com

  • Abstract:  Although we've already posted a “first looks” preview of how the Ryzen 7 1700 performs online, we're finally getting around to giving this processor its due. Read on to see if this is the perfect Ryzen for you.This Summit Ridge processor equipped with two...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-05-22, Author: Chris , review by: channelpostmea.com

  • Abstract:  One of the biggest advantages of the latest AMD Ryzen 7 1800X and 1700X 8-core processors over the Intel i7-6900K is that they are far more affordable with a performance that almost matches head-on. And if you think that the new Ryzen 7 chips are still ou...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-05-11, Author: Rafael , review by: hardwaresecrets.com

  • Comparing the results of the Ryzen 7 1700 benchmarks to the the Core i7-7700K, it is clear that, in some testes (like the Cinebench R15), the Ryzen 7 1700 is far superior (because of its number of cores and threads). On the other hand, in other tests and...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-05-08, Author: Mark , review by: arstechnica.com

  • Remarkable multithreaded performance, More core and threads than the competition, 1600X on par with a stock i5 7600K in gaming, The full-featured AM4 platform, Excellent value for money
  • Questions remain over gaming performance, Some early adopter quirks linger, Overclocking not as strong as Kaby Lake

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Ian , review by: anandtech.com

  • We have already shown in previous reviews that the Zen microarchitecture from AMD is around the equivalent of Intel's Broadwell microarchitecture, but at this lower price point we have AMD's Zen against Intel's Kaby Lake, which is two generations newer th...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 4 of 35 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 35   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×