uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.co.uk have collected 347 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice March 2017
March 2017
 
(84%)
347 Reviews
Users
(98%)
17 Reviews
84 0 100 347

The editors liked

  • 65W TDP (Cool running
  • Impressive performance perWatt)
  • 8/16 cores threads
  • Easy to overclock
  • Very competitive price
  • Supplied with RGB LED cooler
  • 8 cores
  • 16 threads for under £320
  • Impressive multi-core performance
  • Lower TDP than 1700X or 1800X
  • Wide range of modern AM4 boards
  • Makes Core i7 X99 seem ultra-expensive
  • Competitive price
  • 8-Core w/ 16 Threads
  • New AM4 platform
  • Very easy to overclock
  • Can closely match the 1800X while overclocked
  • Precision Boost and XFR
  • Excellent performance in rendering (Cinebench)
  • Good gaming performance
  • Unlocked ratio multiplier
  • Lowcost eight core
  • 65W TDP
  • Bundled cooler
  • Eight cores
  • Faster than the the Ryzen 7 1800X when overclocked
  • Excellent multi-threaded performance that is vastly superior to that of the Core i7-7700K
  • Competitive performance against Intel processors three times its price
  • Up to 3.75GHz XFR frequency helps single-threaded performance
  • Unlocked CPU multiplier and o

The editors didn't like

  • No XFRtechnology
  • Specific memory requirements
  • Single-thread is good but not great
  • Gaming optimisations still needed
  • None
  • Neutral
  • Memory performance still has a few bugs
  • But we expect these to be fixed with a BIOS update
  • Like all 8-core chips
  • It can get quite warm
  • So a powerful cooler is recommended
  • Price is very similar to the more established i7-7700K
  • “The Ryz
  • Lower stock performance than other Ryzen 7 models
  • Lower game performance than Intel processors
  • Poorly optimized software ecosystem
  • Low stock speed
  • Not as fast in lightly threaded tasks as Intel chips
  • Gaming performance is not best suited for ultra-high refresh rates and trails i7-7700K levels (outside of GPU-limited scenarios)
  • Lower memory frequency support compared to Kaby Lake

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 7 of 35
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-03-04, Author: Michael , review by: phoronix.com

  • Abstract:  Curious how Ryzen scales across its CPU cores and SMT? Here are some Ubuntu Linux benchmarks testing a Ryzen 7 1700 with different core counts.The MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM motherboard used for our Ryzen 7 testing thus far offers a new "downcore con...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-03, Author: Nathan , review by: legitreviews.com

  • AMD Ryzen With ATI RubyThe AMD Ryzen 7 1700 processor benchmark results with this chip overclocked up to 4.0 GHz are impressive. Running all 8-cores on a Ryzen processor at 4 GHz is fun and you can see how far AMD has come with Ryzen since the old FX seri...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-03, Author: Michael , review by: phoronix.com

  • Abstract:  Yesterday we posted launch-day Ryzen 7 1800X Linux benchmarks that were particularly appealing for multi-core / heavily-threaded workloads like code compilation. Given all the code compilation done by Linux users in particular, if you were intrigued by th...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-02, Author: Marco , review by: hothardware.com

  • Strong Overall Performance, 8-Cores / 16-Threads, Power Friendly, Aggressive Pricing
  • Issues In A Few Benchmarks, Unimpressive Overclocking In Early Stages
  • It's not all good news, though. With some legacy apps, audio encoding, lower-res gaming, and platform level tests, Ryzen trailed Intel – sometimes by a wide margin. There is obviously still optimization work that needs to be done – from both AMD and softw...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-03-02, Author: garfi3ld , review by: lanoc.org

  • Man, there is just so much to take in with this launch. I've gone through the testing and even though I have to follow up (hopefully) later on today when our 1700 comes in with its performance. I can say that testing Ryzen as a whole has been a roller...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-02, Author: Nathan , review by: legitreviews.com

  • AMD sees Ryzen 7 processors as being the perfect fit for multi-threaded (nT) work with slightly lower single threaded (1T) performance. Our testing shows that is true for the most part. In applications where all cores are being used the 8-Core, 16-Thread...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-10-30, Author: SKYMTL , review by: hardwarecanucks.com

  • Abstract:  I'm going to start this article off with a simple number: five. Not only is that the number of months it has taken AMD to effectively turn the x86 processor world on its ear, but that's also the number of distinct model families that they've introduced...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: SKYMTL , review by: hardwarecanucks.com

  • Looking back at how things played out over the course of this review, I have no doubt it will be one of the most hotly debated articles that I've written in the last few months, maybe even the last year. There's no denying that the Zen architecture has pr...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-05-05, Author: Phil , review by: pctechreviews.com.au

  • Solid 8 Core/16 Thread performance, Lower TDP of 65W for cooler operation, Our Sample overclocked to 3.9GHz easily, Suitable for content creation / video editing or render work, New AM4 platform, Very compelling price, Great CPU for a multi-purpose system
  • Still slightly slower in some single threaded applications
  • Ryzen has been worth the wait. AMD has delivered a solid processor at a disruptive price point. The Ryzen 7 1700 may not have the XFR feature but it's still unlocked and overclocks provided that you have the right motherboard chipset.Power draw and temper...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-09-02, Author: Tony , review by: itwire.com

  • Abstract:  COMMENT My faith in the AMD processor range has been reinforced by the impressive new Ryzen series.I've nothing against Intel except their premium pricing — a bit like Telstra, I suppose — but have been using AMD processors in my desktop systems for well...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 7 of 35 « Previous   1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 35   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×