uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 3.4GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 3.4GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.co.uk have collected 293 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 3.4GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 87%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 3.4GHz Socket AM4 .
Award: Editor’s Choice March 2017
March 2017
 
(87%)
293 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
87 0 100 293

The editors liked

  • 8 cores
  • 16 threads for under £400
  • Impressive multi-core performance
  • Almost every bit as fast as the 1800X
  • Wide range of modern AM4 boards
  • Vastly improved power consumption
  • Gives Intel food for thought
  • High performance
  • 8/16 cores threads
  • Easy to overclock
  • Sense MI technologies (XFR)
  • Very competitive price
  • Supplied with RGB LED cooler
  • Competitive Performanceperwatt
  • Great value for money
  • 8-Core w/ 16 Threads
  • Latest AM4 platform
  • Incredibly easy to overclock
  • Performance similar to the flagship 1800X
  • Automatic overclocking
  • Good overall performance
  • Robust gaming performance
  • Unlocked ratio multiplier
  • Low cost eightcore
  • Low TDP
  • Multithreaded application performance
  • Superb multithreaded performance
  • Comfortably outperforms the similarlypriced Core i76800K in multithreaded tasks
  • Up to 3.9GHz XFR and 3.8GHz Precision Boost frequencies aid singlethreaded performance
  • Can be overclocked close to Ryzen 7 1800X frequencie

The editors didn't like

  • Single-thread is good but not great
  • Gaming optimisations still needed
  • Limited overclocking potential
  • The 1700 may be better value for the enthusiast
  • None
  • Neutral
  • Memory performance still has a few bugs
  • But we expect these to be fixed with a BIOS update
  • Like all 8-core chips
  • It can get quite warm
  • So a powerful cooler is recommended
  • Still a little more expensive than the 7700K
  • “The Ryzen R7 1700
  • Lower gaming performance than Intel processors
  • Poorly optimized software ecosystem
  • Gaming performance is not best suited for ultrahigh refresh rates and trails Core i76800K and i77700K levels (outside of GPUlimited scenarios)
  • Some memory speed limitations – difficult pushing past 3.2GHz
  • Fewer PCIe lanes and dualchannel memory are comp

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 30
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-11-08, Author: Luca , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  These days there are basically two different groups of customers who demand lots of processing power: content creators and gamers, while this 2D performance comparison is targeting content creators. After having had a look at the following pages you'll ha...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-05-06, Author: Peter , review by: eteknix.com

  • For the desktop PC gamer, the higher TDP X models are still the go-to for gaming and general performance though. They're a little faster, and a little more expensive, but you get what you pay for. However, if heat and power are a big concern to you, and t...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-05-06, Author: Peter , review by: eteknix.com

  • I can see the Ryzen 5 2600 and the 2600X fast becoming the most popular chips of the second generation Ryzen launch. They're fast, they're affordable, and they're easy to keep cool and overclock. I mean, if you're just doing a massive amount of rendering...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-03-23, Author: Reinoud , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Which processor now offers the most bang of your buck varies per price segment. If you have a very small budget, in our opinion it is best to find an Intel Pentium G4560, which, given its higher availability, is less of a challenge than it was a few month...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-03-23, Author: Reinoud , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Which processor now offers the most bang of your buck varies per price segment. If you have a very small budget, in our opinion it is best to find an Intel Pentium G4560, which, given its higher availability, is less of a challenge than it was a few month...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-12-05, Author: Richard , review by: eurogamer.net

  • There's a range of advice we can offer to any prospective Ryzen owners. First, the more expensive 1800X is only recommended if you want the fastest possible stock processor, no matter what the cost. Highly clocked out of the box, there's not a huge amount...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-06-29, Author: Gavin , review by: play3r.net

  • Abstract:  AMD hadn't just announced a new processor architecture, but the dawning of a new manufacturing process in which the chips would be based on, 14nm which was a first for AMD. Not only was their new 14nm FinFET process to be more energy efficient, but would...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-06, Author: Antony , review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • AMD Ryzen 7 1700X ReviewManufacturer: AMDUK price (as reviewed): £366.98 (inc VAT)US price (as reviewed): $399.99 (ex tax)We're just a week away from the launch of a cluster of Ryzen 5 CPUs, including four-core and six-core offerings, which should certain...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-04-02, review by: vortez.net

  • High performance, 8/16 cores threads, Easy to overclock, Sense MI technologies (XFR), Very competitive price, Supplied with RGB LED cooler, Competitive Performanceperwatt
  • The 1700 may be better value for the enthusiast
  • If outright gaming performance is what you are looking for when looking at a Ryzen 7 CPU, it is easy to misunderstand what you are looking at. Most games right now aren't optimised for this many CPU threads, and the ones that are will likely show a signif...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-03-30, Author: Dave , review by: pcgamesn.com

  • Before I started testing this chip I was half-expecting to call out the Ryzen 7 1700X as the unwanted middle child of AMD's new octa-core range, but the more I think about it it's the 1800X that starts to look essentially irrelevant.The 1700X is a genuine...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 1 of 30 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 30   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×