uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4

Testseek.co.uk have collected 220 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4.
Award: Editor’s Choice August 2017
August 2017
 
(88%)
220 Reviews
Users
(60%)
2 Reviews
88 0 100 220

The editors liked

  • Brilliant unboxing/installation experience
  • Performs well in multi-threaded scenarios
  • Decent thermal performance
  • Supplies up to 66 PCI Express Gen3 lanes
  • Blazes through workstation tasks with ease
  • Incredible multi-tasking potential
  • Competitive 4K gaming performance
  • Easy to overclock (albeit hard to keep cool)
  • 64-PCIe lanes
  • Quad-channel memory support
  • 16 cores and 32 threads for $999
  • Extremely fast in multi-threaded tasks
  • Forward-looking X399 platform
  • Quad-channel memory
  • Brings competition back to HEDT
  • Workstation and productivity applications
  • Price per core
  • Solder
  • Multi-Threaded performance
  • PCIe connectivity
  • Ready for the ultimate mega-tasking
  • Easier to Install than Intel
  • Futureproof expandability
  • Superb multi-threaded performance
  • 1950X is the highest-performance consumer CPU available and the 1920X is generally second-fastest
  • Excellent price versus performance even compared to Ryzen 7
  • Quad-channel memory support with high bandwidth results and
  • Amazing multi-core performance
  • Plenty of PCIe lanes
  • Fast memory support
  • Very competitive pricing
  • Strong multi-tasking capabilities
  • Best single-socket CPU power on the market with most applications
  • Best modelling performance with most applications
  • Best GPGPU performance (when configured optimally)

The editors didn't like

  • Expensive
  • No support for NVMe RAID
  • Poor gaming performance at lower resolutions
  • Requires a very powerful CPU cooler
  • Neutral
  • Some games and software still don’t know what to do with all those cores
  • “It’s not without its problems
  • But to see AMD not only competing but winning in workstat
  • Single-thread not as good as Intel
  • Game Mode and Creator Mode confusion
  • Confusing settings
  • Low resolution gaming performance
  • More power hungry than Intel's rival
  • Switching profiles requires a full restart
  • ” in the review are so depraved you can not even imagine
  • And lacking 1 star out of 10… For what? For not being available for free?
  • Oxymorons
  • Robert Johnson
  • I have to slightly disagree with the gaming analysis. Many times the reason RYZEN doesn't perf
  • Middling single-core performance
  • Expensive overall system price – £1
  • 200 more than AMD-AMD option
  • NVIDIA GeForce graphics not validated for professional applications
  • Behind AMD option for video editing with Adobe applications
  • Price
  • £5
  • 754.00 inc VAT (Buy from Armari HERE)
  • Discuss on

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 8 of 22
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-10-05, Author: Guillaume , review by: hardware.fr

  • Abstract:  Sandy Bridge-E (2011, 32nm) Carte mère Asus P9X79 (4 canaux DDR3, PCI Express 3.0, SATA 6 Gb/s) Core i7-3970X Core i7-3930K LGA 1366: Bloomfield/Gulftown (2008/2010, 45/32nm) Carte mère Intel DX58SO (3 canaux DDR3, PCI Express 2.0, SATA 3 Gb...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Guillaume , review by: hardware.fr

  • Abstract:  AMD continue dans sa lancée en proposant aujourd'hui une nouvelle plateforme desktop haut de gamme, pour ne pas dire très haut de gamme baptisée Threadripper. Une nouvelle plateforme structurée autour de nouvelles cartes mères qui accueillent aujourd'hui...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-07-31, Author: Régis , review by: Lesnumeriques.com

  • Performances en rendu 3D, Performances en encodage vidéo, Performances élevées du fait de la présence de 16 cœurs
  • Performances dans les jeux, Performances légèrement en retrait lorsque le système mémoire est mis à rude contribution
  • Avec ses 16 cœurs et sa fréquence de fonctionnement élevée, il est évident que ce processeur s'avère ultra rapide pour réaliser des tâches applicatives. Arme absolue pour l'encodage vidéo et autre rendu 3D, ce Threadripper reste toutefois moins à son avan...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2019-07-19, review by: computerbase.de

  • Abstract:  Maxon hat den beliebten weil kostenlosen und einfach zu handhabenden CPU-Benchmark Cinebench neu aufgelegt. Sechs Jahre nach Cinebench R15 folgt Cinebench R20 mit neuer Engine und neuer Projektdatei...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-03-11, review by: computerbase.de

  • Abstract:  tl;dr: Maxon hat den beliebten weil kostenlosen und einfach zu handhabenden CPU-Benchmark Cinebench neu aufgelegt. Sechs Jahre nach Cinebench R15 folgt Cinebench R20 mit neuer Engine und neuer Projektdatei. ComputerBase hat eigene Benchmarks erstellt und...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-02-03, Author: Christoph , review by: computerbild.de

  • Abstract:  Bei neuen Spitzenmodellen reicht oft nur Geduld, um das Smartphone unter 500 Euro zu bekommen.2018 erklommen die Preise für Top-Smartphones neue Regionen. Das auffälligste Beispiel liefert Apple: Das günstigste aktuelle iPhone beginnt bei 849 Euro...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-12-30, review by: computerbase.de

  • Intel Basin Falls Refresh im HEDT-SegmentDer Basin Falls Refresh als Plattform-Update widmet sich mit dem Skylake-X Refresh den Core-X-Prozessoren, deren Namensgeber im Juni 2017 die Skylake-X-Familie war. Sie sind nach wie vor im Sockel R4 alias LGA 2066...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-12-22, Author: Ingolf , review by: computerbild.de

  • Mit gleich 32 beziehungsweise 18 Rechenkernen und stolzen Preisen von 1.800 Euro teilen sich AMDs Threadripper Ryzen 2990WX und Intels Core i9-7980XE den COMPUTER BILD-Testsieg. Damit kommen sie aber nur für Enthusiasten mit dickem Geldbeutel infrage...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-12-03, Author: Florian , review by: computerbild.de

  • Mit gleich 32 beziehungsweise 18 Rechenkernen und stolzen Preisen von 1.800 Euro teilen sich AMDs Threadripper Ryzen 2990WX und Intels Core i9-7980XE den COMPUTER BILD-Testsieg. Damit kommen sie aber nur für Enthusiasten mit dickem Geldbeutel infrage. Ein...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-08-16, review by: computerbase.de

  • AMD und Intel sprechen in Bezug auf die TDP mittlerweile inhaltlich mehr oder weniger dieselbe Sprache: Beide beziehen sich auf den vom Kühlsystem abzuführenden Verbrauch bei einer spezifizierten Leistung, die allerdings nur bei Intel halbwegs greifbar is...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 8 of 22 « Previous   1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 22   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×