uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core i7 920 2.66GHz Socket 1366



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i7 920 2.66GHz Socket 1366

Testseek.co.uk have collected 132 expert reviews of the Intel Core i7 920 2.66GHz Socket 1366 and the average rating is 89%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i7 920 2.66GHz Socket 1366.
Award: Most Awarded November 2008
November 2008
 
(89%)
132 Reviews
Users
(97%)
589 Reviews
89 0 100 132

The editors liked

  • Really good performance
  • Hyperthreading
  • Around 4Ghz overclockable
  • Good price/performance ratio for the CPU
  • Extremely fast
  • Best CPU architecture on the market
  • Quality quadcore performance
  • Works well with audio
  • Video
  • 3D applications
  • Large improvement over the previous series
  • Does well even with nonoptimized software
  • Low power consumption when idle

The editors didn't like

  • Expensive system wide parts to upgrade
  • Runs hot
  • Needs almost a whole new PC
  • Pricey with all things considered
  • Power consumption is high when processor is active

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 14
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-03-23, Author: Reinoud , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Which processor now offers the most bang of your buck varies per price segment. If you have a very small budget, in our opinion it is best to find an Intel Pentium G4560, which, given its higher availability, is less of a challenge than it was a few month...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-03-23, Author: Reinoud , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Which processor now offers the most bang of your buck varies per price segment. If you have a very small budget, in our opinion it is best to find an Intel Pentium G4560, which, given its higher availability, is less of a challenge than it was a few month...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-03-05, Author: Reinoud , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • In 2009, we concluded about the Core i7 920 that performance gains of dozens of percent killed earlier processors, and the i7 980X review ended with the conclusion that Intel in the upper end only competed with itself.In 2018 that is another story. Wi...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-07-04, Author: Koen , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Late May we published a huge round-up of 45 desktop processors , followed by a review of Intel's fourth generation Core processors . Our readers immediately, and understandably, came with the request for a similar group test of laptop processors. It's a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-05-28, review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  On June 4 Intel is launching its next generation Core processors, also called Haswell. That means it's the perfect opportunity for us to retest all current processors and a number of older ones with a completely new test configuration. It will not only ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-09-07, Author: Christian , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Anyway stay tuned as I said in our previous articles, more CPUs will follow: AMD Phenom II x2AMD Phenom I x4AMD Brazos ?Intel Core i5 2500KIntel Core i3 Ivy BridgeIntel Atom ?Hey guys, which fight do you want to see next time? Feel free to leave a comment...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-08-03, review by: Xtremecomputing.co.uk

  • Really good performance, Hyperthreading, Around 4Ghz overclockable, Good price/performance ratio for the CPU
  • Expensive system wide parts to upgrade, Runs hot
  • Throughout these benchmarks, the AMD Phenom II 955 just hasn’t been able to keep up with the i7 920. But AMD know this and it’s not intended to be the i7 920’s rival as the 955 is priced £60 less than the i7 920. (in fact even the Q...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2009-03-06, review by: techradar.com

  • Extremely fast, Best CPU architecture on the market
  • Needs almost a whole new PC, Pricey with all things considered

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2008-12-11, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Quality quadcore performance: works well with audio, video, 3D applications, Large improvement over the previous series, Does well even with nonoptimized software, Low power consumption when idle
  • Power consumption is high when processor is active

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2008-11-03, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Just as Intel’s Core 2 has firmly established itself in the market, it is already being replaced by a completely new architecture. Unlike the switch from the Pentium 4 / Pentium D to the Core2—where the new CPUs worked as drop-in replacements on existi...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 14 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 14   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×