uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Tablets/e-Readers » Asus Z300M ZenPad 10.1 inch



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Asus Z300M ZenPad 10.1 inch

Testseek.co.uk have collected 28 expert reviews of the Asus Z300M ZenPad 10.1 inch and the average rating is 74%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Asus Z300M ZenPad 10.1 inch.
Award: Good Buy August 2017
August 2017
 
(74%)
28 Reviews
Users
(91%)
58 Reviews
74 0 100 28

The editors liked

  • Affordable price
  • Games run reasonably well
  • Stereo speakers

The editors didn't like

  • Low screen resolution
  • Hardly different to old model
  • Dated software

 

Reviews

page 1 of 3
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-07-25, Author: Andrew , review by: techradar.com

  • Affordable price, Games run reasonably well, Stereo speakers
  • Low screen resolution, Hardly different to old model, Dated software
  • While we're glad new, cheaper alternatives to the iPad exist, the ZenPad 10 Z301ML is only superficially different to the 2016 model it replaces. We hoped for a bit more.As before, screen quality is the biggest issue. The ZenPad 10 just doesn't have the p...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(50%)
 
  Published: 2017-05-09, Author: Devon , review by: devontechsupport.com

  • The Z300M plods along well enough, and offers better value than a rival Samsung slate, but this feels like a tablet designed for clueless high street shoppers. Those in the know would do better to spend just a little more for much greater returns.Competit...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-17, Author: Florian , review by: notebookcheck.net

  • slim and light casing, extensive software, LTE support, decent GPS, high-contrast screen, low temperatures, low power consumption
  • not very stiff casing, cracking noise, no USB OTG, long charging times, weak system performance, relatively short battery life

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(79%)
 
  Published: 2016-08-24, Author: Oliver , review by: notebookcheck.net

  • overall good price-performance ratio, accurate GPS, touchscreen's decent performance, very low temperature development
  • screen's low resolution; only mediocre brightness and contrast, long charging times, no fast WiFi 802.11ac, slow card reader
  • The screen's pure visual performance is satisfactory overall, but it does not excite us. The resolution of 1280x800 pixels is basically too low for a modern 10-inch device - at least when the screen cannot serve with top contrast rates that would mask the...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(83%)
 
  Published: 2016-08-09, Author: Riley , review by: makeuseof.com

  • The Asus ZenPad 10 Z300M isn't going to be the next big thing. It's a budget tablet that makes major concessions in camera quality, doesn't support the upcoming USB Type-C standard What Is USB Type-C What Is USB Type-C Ah, the USB plug. It is as ubiquitou...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-10-25, Author: Andrew , review by: techradar.com/au/

  • Low price, Good display color and contrast, Respectable gaming and general performance
  • Unremarkable battery life, Very low screen resolution, Obvious plastic feel
  • Asus beats several competitors for value and display quality, but real gadget fans may want to spend a little more on a tablet with a higher resolution screen, as the ZenPad Z300M leaves the interface and games looking overly pixelated...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2017-08-17, Author: Florian , review by: notebookcheck.org

  • carcasa delgada y ligera, mucho software, soporte LTE, GPS decente, pantalla de alto contraste, temperaturas bajas, bajo consumo de energía
  • carcasa no muy rígida, cruje, sin USB OTG, tarda en cargarse, débil rendimiento del sistema, aguante de la batería relativamente corto

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(79%)
 
  Published: 2016-09-20, Author: Cosmos , review by: xatakandroid.com

  • Diseño, Sonido, Batería
  • Poca resolución de pantalla, Cámaras de fotos

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(68%)
 
  Published: 2016-08-27, Author: Oliver , review by: notebookcheck.org

  • relación precio-rendimiento en general, GPS preciso, decente rendimiento de la pantalla táctil, muy bajo desarrollo de temperatura
  • baja resolución de pantalla; brillo y contraste sólo mediocres, largos tiempos de carga, sin WiFi 802.11ac, lector de tarjetas lento

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(83%)
 
  Published: 2016-07-12, Author: Javier , review by: geeknetic.es

  • Análisis y conclusiónNuestras pruebas de rendimiento arrojan niveles medios para este procesador. Adecuados para un buen rendimiento multimedia a la altura de la resolución de la pantalla de este tablet. Logra una multitarea de calidad, pero tampoco sin i...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(36%)
    page 1 of 3 « Previous   1 2 3   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×