uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Home Electronics » Mp3/media-player » Apple iPod Nano 6G 8GB / 16GB MC525/MC526



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Apple iPod Nano 6G 8GB / 16GB MC525/MC526

Testseek.co.uk have collected 120 expert reviews of the Apple iPod Nano 6G 8GB / 16GB MC525/MC526 and the average rating is 73%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Apple iPod Nano 6G 8GB / 16GB MC525/MC526.
 
(73%)
120 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
73 0 100 120

The editors liked

  • Small and light
  • Built-in clip
  • FM radio with pause function
  • Long battery life
  • Tiny multi-touch screen. VoiceOver song identification. Built-in pedometer and Nike+ compatibility
  • Extremely small
  • Reasonable quality sound
  • FM radio
  • Small and neat design
  • Integrated radio receiver
  • Tiny clip with a dock connector
  • When it comes to build
  • The new iPod nano looks like a cross between an iPod shuffle and an iPhone. The new 1.54-inch multitouch screen looks lovely
  • And the controls are intuitive
  • Responding to swipes and long presses for moving through the menus just fine and is a proficient replacement for the old combo of screen and over sensitive trackwheel. There’s also a standard 30-pin connector on the b
  • Multi-Touch screen and iOS-like interface added
  • Clear and easy to read screen
  • Tuning FM radio easier then previous model
  • Ability to rotate interface
  • Full-screen clock.
  • Solid
  • Industrial design
  • FM radio with live pause
  • Fitness app
  • Responsive multi-touch screen
  • Handy clip-on design
  • A 24hour battery life
  • FM Radio
  • New multitouch technology
  • A 1.5inch display screen
  • Price cut
  • Integrated pedometer support
  • Highly portable
  • Feels good
  • That slick Apple interface
  • Neat features
  • The sound is superb
  • Excellent screen
  • Interface works
  • Compact
  • Wonderfully intuitive
  • Decent sound quality
  • Beautiful design

The editors didn't like

  • Confusing menus
  • High price
  • No camera. No video playback. Screen size makes gesture control awkward. No third-party apps.
  • No more physical controls
  • Dreadful headphones
  • No more extra features
  • Expensive
  • No video
  • Pricey
  • Not really any more functional
  • You’re basically paying at least £90 more for a bit more capacity than the new iPod shuffle
  • An FM radio
  • And the option to pick specific albums rather than playlists. That doesn’t scream value to us
  • Especially when the swanky new iPod touch can be had for just a little more.
  • Nano less usable than it could be
  • No physical playback controls or compatible inline remote-equipped earbuds
  • No video recording
  • No apps
  • No title bar on screen.
  • Not enough classy features for the price
  • Too small to really suit a touchscreen
  • Basic headphones with no clicker
  • No video recording or playback
  • It is extremely easy to lose and due to its weight and size it is difficult to realise exactly where you have left it
  • No video capabilities
  • Despite that price drop
  • It's still relatively expensive
  • Poor headphones
  • No Voice Control
  • You can't just slap the buttons through your pocket like previous versions
  • Will be too small for some
  • Lots of scrolling when navigating
  • No additional apps available

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 12
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2015-05-26, Author: Lou , review by: macworld.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Long ago, Apple fans wore their iPod nanos on their wrists, as a sort of prehistoric Apple Watch. But how well would this setup compare to the real thing? You might surprised. Here's our head-to-head comparison of the Apple Watch and the iPod nano 6Gk, co...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2012-07-05, Author: Amar , review by: laptops.co.uk

  • A 24hour battery life, FM Radio, New multitouch technology, A 1.5inch display screen
  • It is extremely easy to lose and due to its weight and size it is difficult to realise exactly where you have left it
  • A small, nifty, light and reasonably priced iPod Nano and is a great addition to the Apple range. Another benefit is with the release of the new iPod Nano older generations will drop in price and even though they won’t feature the latest technology they w...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-02, review by: whathifi.com

  • Feels good, that slick Apple interface, neat features, the sound is superb
  • Despite that price drop, it's still relatively expensive

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2011-11-21, Author: David , review by: macworld.co.uk

  • Price cut; integrated pedometer support; highly portable
  • No video capabilities
  • It's worth repeating that this update only affects the software; 2010/2011 nanos can get all of these feature for free by updating in iTunes. But if you don't own a sixth-gen nano, this is well worth the money. The 2010 model was already a big step forwar...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2011-03-01, review by: computeractive.co.uk

  • Small and neat design; integrated radio receiver,
  • Expensive; no video,
  • Small and well designed, but the price is too high ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2010-10-19, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Extremely small, Reasonable quality sound, FM radio
  • No more physical controls, Dreadful headphones, No more extra features
  • The nano is still a good MP3 player, but unfortunately, the loss of physical controls mean it loses a star in our final analysis ......

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2010-10-07, review by: webuser.co.uk

  • Abstract:  For anyone who has used Apple's touchscreen products, the latest version of the Nano will feel instantly familiar. But for fans of the click-wheel, it may take a little getting used to.The size has been reduced - it's just over an inch square, making i...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(40%)
 
  Published: 2010-10-01, review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • With the sixth-generation Apple iPod nano, Apple has proved to us that less is not best. Key features that we loved on previous models like the camera, video recording and integrated speaker have disappeared. The new nano remains a solid device for li...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2010-09-22, review by: pocket-lint.com

  • Excellent screen, Interface works, Compact
  • Poor headphones, No Voice Control, You can't just slap the buttons through your pocket like previous versions

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-09-16, review by: CNET.co.uk

  • Small and light; Built-in clip; FM radio with pause function; Long battery life
  • Confusing menus; High price
  • A great product for rich people who use the gym. For everyone else, the iPod shuffle and iPod touch offer better value for money....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
    page 1 of 12 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 12   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×